Skip to main content
Log in

Pronouns and quantifier-scope in English

  • Published:
Journal of Philosophical Logic Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper is truly a joint effort and it could not have been written without the contribution of both authors. Garson, though, deserves credit (or blame) for first seeing the need for two kinds of quantifier scope, and also for devising essentials of the positive theory.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Bibliography

  1. Cooper, Robin, ‘The Interpretation of Pronouns’, in F. Heny and H.Schnelle (eds.),Syntax and Semantics, Vol. 10, Academic Press, New York (1979).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Evans, Gareth, ‘Pronouns, Quantifiers and Relative Clauses (I)’, in M. Platts (ed.),Reference, Truth and Reality, Routeledge, Kegan Paul, New York (1980).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Hintikka, J., ‘Quantifiers vs. Quantification Theory’,Linguistic Inquiry (1974).

  4. Hintikka, J., ‘The Semantics of Questions and the Questions of Semantics’,Acta Philosophical Fennica (1976).

  5. Hintikka, J. and Carlson, L., ‘Pronouns of Laziness in Game Theoretic Semantics’,Theoretical Linguistics (1977).

  6. Hintikka, J. and Carlson, L., ‘Conditionals, Generic Quantifiers, and Other Applications of Subgames’, in A. Kasher (ed.),Meaning and Use (1979).

  7. Kamp, H.,A Theory of Truth and Semantic Representation (unpublished manuscript).

  8. Kowalski, R.,Logic for Problem Solving, North Holland, Amsterdam (1979).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Montague, R., ‘English as a Formal Language’, in [11].

  10. Montague, R., ‘Universal Grammar’, in [11].

  11. Montague, R., ‘The Proper Treatment of Quantification in English’, in [11].

  12. Montague, R.,Formal Philosophy: Selected Papers of Richard Montague (edited by R. Thomason) (1974).

  13. Partee, B., ‘Bound Variables and Other Anaphora’,Proceedings of TINLAP-2 (Edited by D. Waltz) (1978).

  14. Partee, B., ‘Montague Grammar and Transformational Grammar’, inLinguistic Inquiry (1975).

  15. Partee, B., ‘Opacity, Coreference and Pronouns’, inSemantics for Natural Language (Edited by D. Davidson and G. Harman) (1972).

  16. Saarinen, Esa, ‘Game Theoretic Semantics’,Monist (1977).

  17. Saarinen, Esa, ‘Backwards Looking Operators in Tense Logic and in Natural Language’, in J. Hintikka, L. Niniluoto and E. Saarinen (eds.),Essays in Mathematical and Philosophical Logic (1978).

  18. Stalnaker, R., ‘Complex Predicates’,Monist (1977).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

We would like to thank Nuel Belnap, Irene Heim, Robert May, Barbara Partee, Esa Saarinen, Bas van Fraassen and the anonymous referees of previous drafts for helpful criticisms and comments which greatly improved this paper. In retrospect, it frightens us to think that any one of the drafts of this paper might have found its way into print. We honestly believe, although we do not hold the editor responsible for any remaining mistakes or confusions, that our paper has improved dramatically because of his persistence in demanding that we rewrite.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Le Pore, E., Garson, J. Pronouns and quantifier-scope in English. J Philos Logic 12, 327–358 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00263482

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00263482

Keywords

Navigation