Elsevier

Cognition

Volume 75, Issue 3, 15 June 2000, Pages B65-B78
Cognition

Brief article
Symmetry, repetition, and figural goodness: an investigation of the Weight of Evidence theory

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-0277(00)00070-6Get rights and content

Abstract

Considerable evidence has accumulated on the superiority of symmetry over repetition in the study of figural goodness. The Weight of Evidence theory of figural goodness (WoE) provides a mathematically rigorous, elegant, and testable account of how factors like symmetry and repetition affect figural goodness. In this study we investigate implications of the WoE approach. More specifically, we examine (1) embedded patterns versus simple elements, (2) the number of elements in a pattern, and (3) long-range dependencies within a pattern. Data from two experiments illustrate cases in which figures made of simple repetitions have higher figural goodness than some kinds of symmetrical patterns; thus, the generality of the symmetry over repetition phenomenon is questioned. We discuss our results with respect to WoE and suggest ways to further develop the theory.

Introduction

Different perceptual patterns appear to us more regular than others. The two upper patterns in Fig. 1 are composed of the same contours, but in one case they are organized to form a symmetrical grouping of high regularity or figural goodness, and in the other contours are repeated to form a figure that appears less regular. The effects of figural goodness can be operationalized in several ways. For example, a random noise element has been introduced into the lower two patterns in Fig. 1. The noise element is readily noticeable in the ‘good’ left pattern but less so on the ‘bad’ right one. Intuitively, the noise element more easily segments away from the good figure, while there is less basis for segmentation of figure and noise in the bad pattern.

Theories of figural goodness attempt to explain why some novel configurations of perceptual elements are perceived as more regular than others. A widely reported phenomenon is that the symmetry of perceptual elements is more important than repetition to perception of goodness (Baylis and Driver, 1994, Bruce and Morgan, 1975, Corballis and Roldan, 1974), at least when the relevant contours are perceived as belonging to the same object (Baylis & Driver, 1995). The Weight of Evidence model of figural goodness (henceforth WoE; van der Helm and Leeuwenberg, 1996, van der Helm and Leeuwenberg, 1999) can account for the advantage of symmetry over repetition, as well as an impressive range of other figural goodness phenomena. Apart from its empirical plausibility, the theory has received considerable theoretical attention because it is also mathematically tractable and elegant. In the present work we examine the aspects of WoE that account for the commonly observed advantage of symmetry over repetition. In doing so, we identify cases which question the generality of the symmetry over repetition phenomenon.

We next briefly review previous accounts of figural goodness that motivate the importance of the WoE theory.

Section snippets

Figural goodness

We can identify two main traditions in perceptual organization and figural goodness, with WoE comprising a third possibility (for a more thorough exposition see Chater, 1996, van der Helm and Leeuwenberg, 1996).

On the one hand, there is the transformation approach (e.g. Garner, 1974). By this approach, a figure is judged well formed to the extent that it has many invariant transformations (that is, transformations, such as a rotation, that leave the figure unchanged). A square has more

van der Helm and Leeuwenberg's theory

The van der Helm and Leeuwenberg (1996) (henceforth H&L) theory combines theoretical elegance with the provision of a computational framework detailed enough to allow for a quantitative account of many figural goodness phenomena. Of relevance to the present study, the importance of symmetry against repetition can be explained in terms of specific computational considerations within the WoE framework.

Testing the Weight of Evidence theory

We undertook a direct investigation of WoE and its mechanisms for predicting the symmetry over repetition advantage. The present version of the WoE theory applies to one-dimensional sequences of symbols, which would represent stimulus properties at an abstract level. For example, something like ‘abab’ could depict a perceptual picture where there are two shapes repeated once. Consider the following pairs of such sequences in Table 1.

In example 1 we illustrate an implication of the block

Experiment 1

A characteristic of figural goodness is that regular figures would tend to segment away from random noise. Thus, the dot pattern sequences were each presented side by side with an identical one, but for a randomly placed error in one of them. High figural goodness implies that the error would be more quickly detected.

Experiment 2

We next sought to generalize our findings from Experiment 1 using a very different task. Symbol sequences were mapped into arrangements of dots and participants were asked to extrapolate each sequence by choosing the appropriate next symbol. The speed of extrapolation would depend on the speed with which regularity in a sequence is identified; this would constitute a measure of figural goodness alternative to that in Experiment 1. Participants selected their response from a menu containing the

General discussion

There has been abundant support for the observation that at a broad level symmetry is better formed as opposed to repetition and theories of figural goodness have often been assessed in terms of how well they can account for this phenomenon. However, fine grained investigations of symmetry versus repetition have been rare, perhaps because the formulation of many theories of figural goodness is not detailed enough to allow direct empirical investigations. An exception is the work of H&L who have

Acknowledgements

Part of this research was conducted while Emmanuel Pothos was at the Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford. Emmanuel Pothos was supported by the UK Medical Research Council (reference number: G78/4804), the Bodossaki foundation, and the A.S. Onasis foundation (reference: Group S-076/1996-97). We would like to thank Nick Chater, Peter van der Helm, Kim Shapiro and two anonymous reviewers for helpful comments on this work.

References (15)

  • S.E. Palmer

    The psychology of perceptual organization: a transformational approach

  • G.C. Baylis et al.

    Parallel computation of symmetry but not repetition within single visual shapes

    Visual Cognition

    (1994)
  • G.C. Baylis et al.

    Obligatory edge assignment in vision: the role of figure and part segmentation in symmetry detection

    Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance

    (1995)
  • V.G. Bruce et al.

    Violations of symmetry and repetition in visual patterns

    Perception

    (1975)
  • N. Chater

    Reconciling simplicity and likelihood principles in perceptual organization

    Psychological Review

    (1996)
  • M.C. Corballis et al.

    On the perception of symmetrical and repeated patterns

    Perception and Psychophysics

    (1974)
  • W.R. Garner

    The processing of information and structure

    (1974)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (13)

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text