Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-wzw2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-25T04:58:27.606Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Review Essay: The ‘Two Dogmas of Empiricism' 50 Years On

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2024

Paolo Parrini
Paolo Parrini*
Affiliation:
University of Florence
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This chronicle is a review of a collective publication commemorating the fiftieth anniversary of W. V. O. Quine’s most influential paper. The author, a prominent epistemologist, discusses these contributions in a way that sheds a particular light on the importance of Quine’s work for the ongoing epistemological debate.

Type
Articles
Information
Diogenes , Volume 54 , Issue 4 , November 2007 , pp. 91 - 101
Copyright
Copyright © UNESCO 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Boghossian, Paul (1996) ‘Analyticity Reconsidered’, Noûs, 30: 360–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carnap, R. (1950) ‘Empiricism, Semantics, and Ontology’, Revue international de philosophie, 4: 20–40.Google Scholar
Cohen, Jonathan (1987) ‘The Importance of Quine’, London Times Literary Supplement, November.Google Scholar
Glock, H.-J., Glüer, K. and Keil, G., eds (2003) Fifty Years of Quine's ‘Two Dogmas'. Grazer Philosophische Studien: Internationale Zeitschrift für analytische Philosophie, Vol. 66. Amsterdam/New York: Editions Rodopi BV.Google Scholar
Grice, Paul and Strawson, Peter F. (1956) ‘In Defense of a Dogma ’, Philosophical Review, 65: 141–58.10.2307/2182828CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamlyn, David (1961) ‘Analytic Truths’, Mind, 65: 359–67.Google Scholar
Hamlyn, David (1966) ‘On Necessary Truths’, Mind, 70: 514–25.Google Scholar
Naess, A. (1953) Interpretation and Preciseness. Oslo: Jacob Dybwad.Google Scholar
Pap, Arthur (1958) Semantics and Necessary Truth. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Pap, Arthur (1946) The A Priori in Physical Theory. New York: Russell & Russell, edn 1968.Google Scholar
Putnam, Hilary (1962) ‘The Analytic and the Synthetic’, in Feigl, H. and Maxwell, G. (eds), Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol III: Scientific Explanation, Space and Time, pp. 358–97. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Quine, W.V. (1935) ‘Truth by Convention’, in Lee, O.H. (ed.), Philosophical Essays for A.N. Whitehead, pp. 90–124. New York: Longmans.Google Scholar
Quine, W.V. (1951) ‘Two Dogmas of Empiricism’, Philosophical Review, 60(January): 20–43.10.2307/2181906CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quine, W.V. (1953) ‘Two Dogmas of Empiricism’, in From a Logical Point of View, pp. 20–46. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, edn 1961.Google Scholar
Quine, W.V. (1954) ‘Carnap and Logical Truth’, Synthese, 12: 350–74.Google Scholar
Quine, W.V. (1960) Word and Object. Boston, MA: SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
Quine, W.V. (1970) Philosophy of Logic. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar