Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Editors' introduction

  • Published:
Artificial Intelligence and Law Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Alexy, R. 1989. A Theory of Legal Argumentation. The Theory of Rational Discourse as Theory of Legal Justification. Oxford: Clarendon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashley, K. D. 1990. Modeling Legal Argument. Reasoning with Cases and Hypotheticals. Cambridge (Massachusetts): MIT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashley, K. D. 1992. Case-based reasoning and its implications for legal expert systems. Artificial Intelligence and Law 1: 113–208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berman, D. H. & Hafner, C. D. 1987. Indeterminacy: A challenge to logic-based models of legal reasoning. In Yearbook of Law, Computers and Technology 3: 1–35. London: Butterworths.

    Google Scholar 

  • Branting, L. K. 1994. A Computational Model of Ratio Decidendi. Artificial Intelligence and Law 2: 1–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, A.v.d.L. 1987. An Artificial Intelligence Approach to Legal Reasoning. Cambridge (Massachusetts): MIT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, T. F. 1995. The Pleadings Game. An Artificial Intelligence Model of Procedural Justice. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loui, R. P., Norman, J., Olson, J. & Merrill, A. 1993. A Design for Reasoning with Policies, Precedents and Rationales. In Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law 202–211. Amsterdam: ACM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loui R. P., & Norman, J. 1995. Rationales and Argument Moves. Artificial Intelligence and Law 3: 158–189.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peczenik, A. 1989. On Law and Reason. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perelman, Ch. & Olbrechts-Tyteca, L. 1969. The new rhetoric. A treatise on argumentation. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rissland, E. L. & D. B. Skalak, D. B. 1991. CABARET: statutory interpretation in a hybrid architecture. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies 34 (1991), 839–887.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sergot, M. J., Sadri, F., Kowalski, R. A., Kriwaczek, F., Hammond, P. & Cory, H. T. 1986. The British Nationality Act as a Logic Program. Communications of the ACM 29: 370–386.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toulmin, S. E. 1958. The Uses of Argument. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. Henry Prakken
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Giovanni Sartor
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Prakken, H., Sartor, G. Editors' introduction. Artif Intell Law 4, 157–161 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00118491

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00118491

Search

Navigation