Skip to main content
Log in

Who wants to live forever? Immortality, authenticity, and living forever in the present

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Journal for Philosophy of Religion Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Death is a bad thing by virtue of its ability to frustrate the subjectively valuable projects that shape our identities and render our lives meaningful. While the presumption that immortality would necessarily result in boredom worse than death proves unwarranted, if the constraint of mortality is a necessary element for virtues, relationships, and motivation to pursue our life-projects, then death might nevertheless be a necessary evil. Mortal or immortal, it’s clear that the value of one’s life depends on its subjectively determined quality, rather than its quantity. Thus, it is imperative to live forever in the present, with flourishing always in mind.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Epicurus, (1926). Letter to Menoeceus. In The extant remains. Cyril Bailey (Trans.) Oxford: Clarendon Press.

  • Feldman F. (1992). Confrontations with the reaper. A philosophical study on the nature and value of death. Oxford, Oxford University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer J.M. (2004). Why immortality is not so bad. In: Benatar D. (ed). Life, death, and meaning. Lanham, Rowman & Littlefied, Inc., pp. 349–363

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1984). The Foucault reader P. Rabinow (Ed.), New York: Pantheon Books.

  • Kaufmann, W. (1976). Death without Dread. In Existentialism, religion, and death: Thirteen essays (pp. 224–248). New York: Meridian.

  • Lucretius (1994). On the nature of the universe. (Trans. R.E. Latham. Introduction and notes by John Godwin.) London: Penguin Books.

  • Luper-Foy S. (1987). Annihilation. The Philosophical Quarterly 37(148): 233–252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nagel T. (1987). What does it all mean?. Oxford, Oxford University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Nietzsche, F. (1967). The birth of tragedy. In The birth of tragedy and the case of Wagner (Trans. Walter Kaufmann.) New York: Vintage Books.

  • Nietzsche F. (1974). The gay science. (Trans. Walter Kaufmann.) New York, Vintage Books

    Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum M.C. (1994). The therapy of desire. Theory and practice in Hellenistic ethics. Princeton, Princeton University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Rorty, R. (1989). Contingency, irony, and solidarity (p. 97). Cambridge University Press.

  • Shusterman, R. (2000). Pragmatist aesthetics. Living beauty, rethinking art (2nd ed.). New York: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc.

  • Williams, B. (1973). The Makropulos Case. In Problems of the self. Philosophical Papers 1956–1972 (pp. 82–100). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Scott Dixon.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Preston, T.M., Dixon, S. Who wants to live forever? Immortality, authenticity, and living forever in the present. Int J Philos Relig 61, 99–117 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11153-007-9114-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11153-007-9114-0

Keywords

Navigation