Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-4hhp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-28T20:48:49.243Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Supreme Court Limits Permissible Scope of Government’s Ability to Force Medication of Mentally Ill Defendants

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2021

Mayelin Prieto-Gonzalez
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

On June 16, 2003, the Supreme Court ruled that forced administration of antipsychotic drugs to a defendant facing serious criminal charges is appropriate in order to render that defendant competent to stand trial, but only in limited circumstances. The treatment must be medically appropriate, substantially unlikely to have side effects that may undermine the fairness of the trial, and necessary to significantly further important government interests, after taking account of less-intrusive alternatives.

Charles Sell, a former dentist, had a long history of mental illness. He had been hospitalized twice, in 1982 and 1984, after expressing paranoid ideas to law enforcement officials. In May 1997, Sell was charged with fifty-six counts of mail fraud, six counts of Medicaid fraud, and one count of money laundering. He was released on bail after a magistrate determined that he was currently competent to stand trial.

Type
Article
Information
Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics , Volume 31 , Issue 4 , Winter 2003 , pp. 737 - 739
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of Law, Medicine and Ethics 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Sell vs. United States, 123 S.Ct. 2174, (2003).Google Scholar
Id. at 2179.Google Scholar
Id.Google Scholar
Id. at 2181.Google Scholar
Id.Google Scholar
Id.Google Scholar
United States v. Sell, 282 F.3d 560, (2002).Google Scholar
Id.Google Scholar
Washington v. Harper, 110 S.Ct. 1028, (1990).Google Scholar
Riggins v. Nevada, 112 S.Ct. 1810, (1992).Google Scholar
Sell vs. United States, 123 S.Ct. 2174, (2003).Google Scholar
Id. at 2184.Google Scholar
Id.Google Scholar
Id. at 2185.Google Scholar
Id.Google Scholar
United States v. Sell, 343 F.3d 950, (2003)Google Scholar
Brief for the American Psychiatric Association, 2003 WL 176630Google Scholar
Id.Google Scholar
Brief for the American Psychological Association, 2002 WL 31898300Google Scholar
Id.Google Scholar
Id.Google Scholar
Id.Google Scholar
The Center for Cognitive Liberty & Ethics, Supreme Court Upholds Right to Refuse Mind-Altering Drugs, at <www.cognitiveliberty.org/news/US_v_Sell_decision.htm> (last visited October 25, 2003)+(last+visited+October+25,+2003)>Google Scholar