Abstract
The liberal view that valid consent is sufficient for a sex act to be morally legitimate is challenged by three major philosophies of sex: the Catholic view of sex as ordained for procreation and properly confined to marriage, the romantic view of sex as bound up with love, and the radical feminist analysis of sex in our society as part and parcel of the domination of women by men. I take a critical look at all three, focusing on Mary Geach's recent statement of the procreation view, Roger Scruton's theory of sexual desire as naturally evolving into intimacy and love, and several radical feminist discussions of sex in sexist society which argue that the notion of consent is unhelpful and, indeed, irrelevant. I argue that none of these lines of argument is convincing, and that consent remains the touchstone of morally permissible sex – although, dmittedly, it may not be very helpful in discussing ideals of human sexuality.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Anscombe, G.E.M., Contraception and Chastity, in I. Primoratz (ed.), Human Sexuality. The International Research Library of Philosophy, vol. 19. Aldershot: Ashgate/ Dartmouth, 1997, pp. 29–50.
Archard, D., Sexual Consent. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1998.
Benn, P., Is Sex Morally Special? Journal of Applied Philosophy 16(3) (1999), pp. 235–245.
Chamallas, M., Consent, Equality, and the Legal Control of Sexual Conduct, Southern California Law Review 61(4) (1987/88), pp. 777–862.
Engels, F., The Origin of the Family, Private Property and the State, trans. A. West, Harmondsworth: Penguin Books, 1985.
Foa, P., What's Wrong with Rape, in M. Vetterling-Braggin et al. (eds.), Feminism and Philosophy. Totowa, NJ: Littlefield, Adams & Co., 1977, pp. 347–359.
Geach, M., Marriage: Arguing to a First Principle in Sexual Ethics, in L. Gormally (ed.), Moral Truth and Moral Tradition: Essays in Honour of Peter Geach and Elizabeth Anscombe. Dublin: Four Courts Press, 1994, pp. 177–193.
Geach, P., The Virtues. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1977.
MacKinnon, C.A., Feminism Unmodified. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1987.
MacKinnon, C.A., Toward a Feminist Theory of the State. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1989.
Mappes, T.A., Sexual Morality and the Concept of Using Another Person, in T.A. Mappes and J.S. Zembaty (eds.), Social Ethics, 4th Ed. New York: McGraw-Hill, Inc., 1992, pp. 203–216.
Marx, K., Early Writings, trans. R. Livingstone and G. Benton. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books, 1984.
Morgan, R., Theory and Practice: Pornography and Rape, in L. Lederer (ed.), Take Back the Night: Women on Pornography. New York: William Morrow & Co., 1980, pp. 134–140.
Muehlenhard, C.L., and Schrag, J.L., Nonviolent Sexual Coercion, in C.L. Muehlenhard and J.L. Schrag (eds.), Acquaintance Rape: The Hidden Crime. New York: John Wiley, 1991, pp. 115–128.
Priest, G., Sexual Perversion, Australasian Journal of Philosophy 75(3) (1997), pp. 360–372.
Primoratz, I., Ethics and Sex. London and New York: Routledge, 1999.
Russell, B., On Ethics, Sex, and Marriage, ed. A. Seckel. Buffalo, NY: Prometheus Books, 1987.
Schulhofer, S.J., Unwanted Sex: The Culture of Intimidation and the Failure of Law. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1998.
Scruton, R., Sexual Desire: A Philosophical Investigation. London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson, 1986.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Primoratz, I. Sexual Morality: Is Consent Enough?. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 4, 201–218 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011878215852
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011878215852