Skip to main content
Log in

Sexual Morality: Is Consent Enough?

  • Published:
Ethical Theory and Moral Practice Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The liberal view that valid consent is sufficient for a sex act to be morally legitimate is challenged by three major philosophies of sex: the Catholic view of sex as ordained for procreation and properly confined to marriage, the romantic view of sex as bound up with love, and the radical feminist analysis of sex in our society as part and parcel of the domination of women by men. I take a critical look at all three, focusing on Mary Geach's recent statement of the procreation view, Roger Scruton's theory of sexual desire as naturally evolving into intimacy and love, and several radical feminist discussions of sex in sexist society which argue that the notion of consent is unhelpful and, indeed, irrelevant. I argue that none of these lines of argument is convincing, and that consent remains the touchstone of morally permissible sex – although, dmittedly, it may not be very helpful in discussing ideals of human sexuality.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Anscombe, G.E.M., Contraception and Chastity, in I. Primoratz (ed.), Human Sexuality. The International Research Library of Philosophy, vol. 19. Aldershot: Ashgate/ Dartmouth, 1997, pp. 29–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Archard, D., Sexual Consent. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benn, P., Is Sex Morally Special? Journal of Applied Philosophy 16(3) (1999), pp. 235–245.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chamallas, M., Consent, Equality, and the Legal Control of Sexual Conduct, Southern California Law Review 61(4) (1987/88), pp. 777–862.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engels, F., The Origin of the Family, Private Property and the State, trans. A. West, Harmondsworth: Penguin Books, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foa, P., What's Wrong with Rape, in M. Vetterling-Braggin et al. (eds.), Feminism and Philosophy. Totowa, NJ: Littlefield, Adams & Co., 1977, pp. 347–359.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geach, M., Marriage: Arguing to a First Principle in Sexual Ethics, in L. Gormally (ed.), Moral Truth and Moral Tradition: Essays in Honour of Peter Geach and Elizabeth Anscombe. Dublin: Four Courts Press, 1994, pp. 177–193.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geach, P., The Virtues. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacKinnon, C.A., Feminism Unmodified. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacKinnon, C.A., Toward a Feminist Theory of the State. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mappes, T.A., Sexual Morality and the Concept of Using Another Person, in T.A. Mappes and J.S. Zembaty (eds.), Social Ethics, 4th Ed. New York: McGraw-Hill, Inc., 1992, pp. 203–216.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marx, K., Early Writings, trans. R. Livingstone and G. Benton. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, R., Theory and Practice: Pornography and Rape, in L. Lederer (ed.), Take Back the Night: Women on Pornography. New York: William Morrow & Co., 1980, pp. 134–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muehlenhard, C.L., and Schrag, J.L., Nonviolent Sexual Coercion, in C.L. Muehlenhard and J.L. Schrag (eds.), Acquaintance Rape: The Hidden Crime. New York: John Wiley, 1991, pp. 115–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Priest, G., Sexual Perversion, Australasian Journal of Philosophy 75(3) (1997), pp. 360–372.

    Google Scholar 

  • Primoratz, I., Ethics and Sex. London and New York: Routledge, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, B., On Ethics, Sex, and Marriage, ed. A. Seckel. Buffalo, NY: Prometheus Books, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schulhofer, S.J., Unwanted Sex: The Culture of Intimidation and the Failure of Law. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scruton, R., Sexual Desire: A Philosophical Investigation. London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Primoratz, I. Sexual Morality: Is Consent Enough?. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 4, 201–218 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011878215852

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011878215852

Navigation