Skip to main content
Log in

Fitch’s paradox and ceteris paribus modalities

  • Published:
Synthese Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The paper attempts to give a solution to the Fitch’s paradox though the strategy of the reformulation of the paradox in temporal logic, and a notion of knowledge which is a kind of ceteris paribus modality. An analogous solution has been offered in a different context to solve the problem of metaphysical determinism.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Balbiani, P., van Ditmarsch, H., Herzig, A., Hoshi, T., de Lima, T., & Baltag, A. (2007). What can we achieve by arbitrary announcements? A dynamic take on fitch’s knowability. In Proceedings of the 11th Theoretical Aspects of Rationality and Knowledge conference (TARK).

  • Burgess J. (2008) Can truth out?. In: Salerno J. (eds) New essays on the knowability paradox. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Dummett M. (2001) Victor’s error. Analysis 61: 1–2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edgington D. (1985) The paradox of knowability. Mind 94: 557–568

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fitch F. B. (1963) A logical analysis of some value concepts. Journal of Symbolic Logic 28: 135–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freddoso A. J. (1983) Accidental necessity and logical determinism. The Journal of Philosophy 80: 257–278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Girard, P. (2008). Modal logic for belief and preference change. PhD in Philosophy, Stanford University.

  • Prior A. N. (1967) Past, present and future. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Rueckert H. (2004) A solution to fitch’s paradox of knowability. In: Symons J., Rahman S. (eds) Logic, epistemology and the unit of science. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Amsterdam, pp 351–380

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Segerberg, K., Rabinowicz, W. (1994). Actual truth, possible knowledge. In R. Fagin (Ed.), Proceedings of the 5th Conference on Theoretical Aspects of Reasoning about Knowledge, Pacific Grove, CA, USA, March 1994 (pp. 122–137). Morgan Kaufmann.

  • Tennant N. (1997) The taming of the true. Clarendon Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomason R. H. (2002) Combinations of tense and modality. In: Guenthner F., Gabbay D. (eds) Handbook of philosophical logic. Kluwer Academic Publisher, Dordrecht, pp 205–234

    Google Scholar 

  • van Benthem J. (2004) What one may come to know. Analysis 64: 95–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Benthem J., Girard P., Roy O. (2009) Everything else being equal. A modal logic approach to ceteris paribus preferences. Synthese 38: 83–125

    Google Scholar 

  • von Wright G. H. (1963) The logic of preference. University of Edinburgh Press, Edinburgh

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson T. (1987) On the paradox of knowability. Mind 96: 256–261

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williamson T. (2000) Knowledge and its limits. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gabriel Sandu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Proietti, C., Sandu, G. Fitch’s paradox and ceteris paribus modalities. Synthese 173, 75–87 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-009-9677-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-009-9677-7

Keywords

Navigation