Skip to main content
Log in

Metacognition and metarepresentation: is a self-directed theory of mind a precondition for metacognition?

  • Published:
Synthese Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Metacognition is often defined as thinking about thinking. It is exemplified in all the activities through which one tries to predict and evaluate one’s own mental dispositions, states and properties for their cognitive adequacy. This article discusses the view that metacognition has metarepresentational structure. Properties such as causal contiguity, epistemic transparency and procedural reflexivity are present in metacognition but missing in metarepresentation, while open-ended recursivity and inferential promiscuity only occur in metarepresentation. It is concluded that, although metarepresentations can redescribe metacognitive contents, metacognition and metarepresentation are functionally distinct.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Carey S., Xu F. (2001). Infants’ knowledge of objects: Beyond object files and object tracking. Cognition, 80, 179–213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cary M., Reder L.M. (2002). Metacognition in strategy selection: Giving consciousness too much credit. In: Izaute M., Chambres P., Marescaux P.J. (eds) Metacognition: Process, function and use. New York, Kluwer, pp. 63–78

    Google Scholar 

  • Conant R.C., Ashby W.R. (1970). Every good regulator of a system must be a model of that system. International Journal of Systems Science 1, 89–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dayan P., Abbott I.F. (2001). Computational and mathematical modeling of neural systems. Cambridge, MIT Press

    Google Scholar 

  • de Villiers J.G. (2000). Language and theory of mind: what are the developmental relationships? In: Baron-Cohen S., Tager-Flusberg H., Cohen D.J. (eds) Understanding Other Minds. Oxford, Oxford University Press, pp. 83–123

    Google Scholar 

  • Decety J., Grezes J., Costes N., Perani D., Jeannerod M., Procyk E., Grassi F., Fazio F. (1997). Brain activity during observation of action. Influence of action content and subject’s strategy. Brain 120, 1763–1777

    Google Scholar 

  • Dienes Z., Perner J. (2002). The metacognitive implications of the implicit-explicit distinction. In: Chambres P., Izaute M., Marescaux P.-J. (eds) Metacognition: Process, function and use. Dordrecht Netherlands, Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 171– 190

    Google Scholar 

  • Dokic, J., & Egré, P. (in press) Margin for error and the transparency of knowledge.

  • Dokic J., Proust J. (eds) (2003). Simulation and knowledge of action. Amsterdam, John Benjamins

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans G. (1982). The varieties of reference. Oxford, Clarendon Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Flavell J.H. (2004). Development of knowledge about vision. In: Levin D.T. (eds)Thinking and seeing. Visual metacognition in adults and children. Cambridge, MIT Press, pp. 13–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foote A.L., Crystal J.D. (2007). Metacognition in the rat. Current Biology 17, 551–555

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gennaro R. (eds) (2004). Higher-order theories of consciousness. An anthology. Amsterdam, John Benjamins

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon R.M. (1996). ‘Radical’ simulationism. In: Carruthers P., Smith P.K. (eds) Theories of theories of mind. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, pp. 11–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Hampton, R. R. (2001). Rhesus monkeys know when they remember. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 98, 5359–5362.

  • Hampton R.R. (2005). Can rhesus monkeys discriminate between remembering and forgetting?. In: Terrace H.S., Metcalfe J. (eds) The missing link in cognition. Origins of self-reflective consciousness. New York, Oxford University Press, pp. 272–295

    Google Scholar 

  • Inman A., Shettleworth S.J. (1999). Detecting metamemory in nonverbal subjects: A test with pigeons. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavioral Processes 25, 389–395

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koriat A. (1993). How do we know that we know? The accessibility model of the feeling of knowing. Psychological Review 100, 609–639

    Google Scholar 

  • Kornell N., Son L.K., Terrace H.S. (2007). Transfer of metacognitive skills and hint seeking in monkeys. Psychological Science 18(1): 64–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leslie A.M., Thaiss L. (1992). Domain specificity in conceptual development: Neuropsychological evidence from autism. Cognition 43, 225–251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levin D.T. (2004). Thinking and seeing. Visual metacognition in adults and children. Cambridge, MIT Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Mellor H. (1991). I and now. In Matters of metaphysics. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, pp. 17–29

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, T. O., & Narens, L. (1992). Metamemory: A theoretical framework and new findings. In T. O. Nelson (Ed.), Metacognition, core readings (pp. 117–130).

  • Nichols S., Stich S. (2003). Mindreading. NewYork, Oxford University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Perner J. (1991). Understanding the representational mind. Cambridge, MIT Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Perner J. (1996). Arguments for a simulation-theory mix. In: Carruthers P., Smith P.K. (eds) Theories of theories mind. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, pp. 90–104

    Google Scholar 

  • Proust, J. (2003a). Action. In B. Smith (Ed.), John Searle (pp. 102–127). Cambridge, Mass.: Cambridge University Press.

  • Proust J. (2003b). Thinking of oneself as the same. Consciousness and Cognition 12(4): 495–509

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Proust J. (2006a). Agency in schizophrenics from a control theory viewpoint. In: Prinz W., Sebanz N. (eds) Disorders of volition. Cambridge, MIT Press, pp. 87–118

    Google Scholar 

  • Proust J. (2006b). Rationality and metacognition in non-human animals. In: Hurley S. , Nudds M. (eds) Rational animals?. Oxford, Oxford University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Proust, J. (in press a). What is a mental function? In A. Brenner & J. Gayon (Eds.), French philosophy of science, Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science.

  • Proust, J. (in press b). Is there a sense of agency for thought? In L. O’Brien (Ed.), Mental action. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Recanati F. (2000). Oratio Obliqua, Oratio Recta. Oxford, Blackwell

    Google Scholar 

  • Rochat Ph. (2003). Five levels of self-awareness as they unfold early in life. Consciousness and cognition 12(4): 717–731

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenthal D. (2000a). Consciousness, content, and metacognitive jujdgments. Consciousness and Cognition 9, 203–214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenthal D. (2000b). Metacognition and higher-order thoughts. Consciousness and Cognition 9, 231–242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schultz W. (1998). Predictive reward signal of dopamine neurons. Journal of Neurophysiology 80, 1–27

    Google Scholar 

  • Searle J.R. (1983). Intentionality. An essay in the philosophy of mind. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith J.D. (2005). Studies of uncertainty monitoring and metacognition in animals and humans. In: Terrace H.S., Metcalfe J. (eds) The missing link in cognition. Origins of self-reflective consciousness. New York, Oxford University Press, pp. 242–271

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith J.D., Beran M.J., Redford J.S., Washburn D.A. (2006). Dissociating uncertainty responses and reinforcement signals in the comparative study of uncertainty monitoring. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 135(2): 282–297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith J.D., Schull J., Strote J., McGee K., Egnor R., Erb L. (1995). The uncertain response in the bottlenosed dolphin. Tursiops truncatus Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 124, 391–408

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sperber D. (1997). Intuitive and reflective beliefs. Mind and Language 12(1): 67–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stich S. (1978). Beliefs and subdoxastic states. Philosophy of Science 45, 499–518

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sugrue L.P., Corrado G.S., Newsome W.T. (2005). Choosing the greater of two goods: Neural currencies for valuation and decision making. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 6, 363–375

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tager-Flusberg H. (2000). Language and understanding minds: connections in autism. In: Baron-Cohen H., Tager-Flusberg S., Cohen D.J. (eds) Understanding Other Minds. Oxford, Oxford University Press, pp. 124–149

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson T. (2000). Knowledge and its limits. Oxford, Oxford University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Zaitchik D. (1990). When representations conflict with reality: The pre-schooler’s problem with false belief and ‘false’ photographs. Cognition 35: 41–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joëlle Proust.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Proust, J. Metacognition and metarepresentation: is a self-directed theory of mind a precondition for metacognition?. Synthese 159, 271–295 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-007-9208-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-007-9208-3

Keywords

Navigation