Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-qxdb6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-28T08:54:44.651Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Use of Forensic DNA Evidence in Prosecutors' Offices

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2021

Jeffrey M. Prottas  and
Alice A. Noble
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

DNA evidence has rapidly become a significant and routine feature of modern criminal prosecutions. The first introduction of DNA evidence in a U.S. Court occurred in 1987. By 1994, 42 percent of local prosecutors reported that they had used DNA evidence in a felony case at least once. By 2001 that number had increased to 68 percent. Moreover, from a technical point of view, the potential benefits of DNA testing are substantial. Early hurdles to admissibility during trial have been overcome by the adoption of rigorous standards for DNA analysis. Rapid development of identification technology, fueled in significant part by the Human Genome Project, and the resultant development and expansion of national forensic DNA databases, has increased the potential of DNA to play a major role in crime solving. Indeed, over three million offender profiles, collected by state and federal authorities, now reside in the National DNA Index System (NDIS). This number is likely to increase as more states and the federal government are expanding compelled DNA collections to individuals arrested for certain crimes.

Type
Independent
Information
Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics , Volume 35 , Issue 2 , Summer 2007 , pp. 310 - 315
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of Law, Medicine and Ethics 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

DeFrances, C. J., “Prosecutors in State Courts, 2001,” Bureau of Justice Statistics Bulletin (2002): at 8–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Id.Google Scholar
Jobling, M. A. and Gill, P., “Encoded Evidence: DNA in Forensic Analysis,” Nature Reviews 5, no. 5 (2004): 739–751.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giannelli, P., “Forensic Science,” Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 33, no. 3 (2005): 535–544, at 535–536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bieber, F. R., “Science and Technology of Forensic DNA Profiling: Current Use and Future Directions,” in Lazer, D., ed., DNA and the Criminal Justice System: The Technology of Justice (Cambridge: MIT Press, 2004): 23–62; Gill, P., “DNA as Evidence: The Technology of Identification,” New England Journal of Medicine 352, no. 26 (2005): 2669-2671.Google Scholar
Axelrad, S., “Survey of State DNA Database Statutes: Statutes Grid,” available at <http://aslme.org/dna_04/grid/guide.pdf> (last visited March 29, 2007).+(last+visited+March+29,+2007).>Google Scholar
Reilly, P., “Legal and Public Policy Issues in DNA Forensics,” Nature Reviews 2, no. 2 (2001): 313–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lovrich, N. P. et al., National Forensic DNA Study Report: Final Report, National Institute of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, U.S. Department of Justice, 2003; National Institute of Justice, Report to the Attorney General on Delays in Forensic DNA Analysis, National Institute of Justice, U.S. Department of Justice, 2003 [hereinafter cited as NIJ].Google Scholar
See Lovrich, , Id.Google Scholar
Id.; see NIJ, supra note 8; Zedlewski, E. and Murphy, M. B., “DNA Analysis for ‘Minor’ Crimes: A Major Benefit for Law Enforcement,” National Institute of Justice Journal 253 (January, 2006): 2–5.Google Scholar
See Lovrich, supra note 8; International Association of Chiefs of Police, DNA Evidence: Enhancing Law Enforcement's Impact from Crime Scene to Courtroom and Beyond, Summit Final Report, vol. 1, U.S. Department of Justice, Philadelphia, PA, 2003.Google Scholar
For a description of the origin of the John Doe Warrant and related policy issues, see Imwinkelreid, E. J., “The Relative Priority That Should Be Assigned to Trial Stage DNA Issues,” in Lazer, supra note 5, at 94–95; see also Gahn, N., “The Wisconsin John Doe Warrant,” and “An Update on John Doe DNA Profile Arrest Warrants,” available at <http://www.denverda.org/DNA_Documents/Gahn2.pdf> (last visited March 29, 2007).+(last+visited+March+29,+2007).>Google Scholar