Skip to main content
Log in

Revisiting the history of relativity

Richard Staley: Einstein’s generation: The origins of the relativity revolution. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2008, x+494pp, $38 PB, $98 HB

  • Book Symposium
  • Published:
Metascience Aims and scope

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Notes

  1. For example, Marías Aguilera (1970); Strauss and Howe (1991), appendix A for a historical sketch; Roseman (1995).

  2. Kragh (1999); Feuer (1973), where Feuer unites Einstein with like-minded thinkers under the banner of a Marxian-Machian spirit of the times.

  3. Stansky (1996), among other studies.

  4. See Crawford (1984), 116–120, for politicking between the chemistry and physics committees over awarding the prize to cosmical physicist Svante Arrhenius (chemistry, 1903). The trajectory of Emil Bose over the first decade of the twentieth century is also illustrative. A doctoral student of Walther Nernst’s at Göttingen, he took the venia legendi with physicist Oskar Emil Meyer at Breslau, and returned to Göttingen as Nernst’s assistant before in 1904 becoming assistant to theoretical physicist Woldemar Voigt and directing the biweekly journal, Physikalische Zeitschrift. In 1906 he went to Danzig as professor of physical chemistry, and in 1909 he assumed direction of the physics institute in La Plata, Argentina. Nernst himself saw physical chemistry as ranging from mathematical physics to chemical kinetics (Pyenson 1985, 153–159).

  5. For one recent study of an intellectual couple from this time see Pyenson (2007), here p. xxx.

  6. It is interesting to read Einstein’s Generation alongside Gay (2008) and Gray (2008). Both Gay and Gray find Modernism firmly established by the last quarter of the nineteenth century.

  7. Pyenson (2005), 261–335, here pp. 7–8 of the unblemished reprint, Three Graces (Lafayette: Editions Giselle Calypso, 2005), available in the Harvard College Library.

References

  • Cahan, David. 2004. An institute for an empire: The Physikalisch-Technische Reichsanstalt, 1871–1918. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, I. Bernard. 1985. Revolution in science. Cambridge, MA: Belknap.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crawford, Elisabeth T. 1984. The beginnings of the Nobel Institution: The science prizes, 1901–1915. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feuer, Lewis S. 1973. Einstein and the generations of science. New York: Basic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galison, Peter. 1997. Image and logic: A material culture of microphysics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gay, Peter. 2008. Modernism: The lure of heresy. From Baudelaire to Beckett and beyond. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, Jeremy. 2008. Plato’s Ghost: The modernist transformation of mathematics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heilbron, John L., and Bruce R. Wheaton. 1981. Literature on the history of physics in the twentieth century, Berkeley papers in history of science V. Berkeley: Office for History of Science and Technology.

  • James, Frank. 1983. The debate on the nature of the absorption of light, 1830–1835: A core-set analysis. History of Science 21: 335–368.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joerges, Bernward, and Terry Shinn (eds.). 2001. Instrumentation: Between science, state and industry. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, Sean F. 2006. Holographic visions: A history of new science. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kragh, Helge. 1999. Quantum generations: A history of physics in the twentieth century. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marías Aguilera, Julián. 1970. Generations. A historical method (trans. Raley, H. C.). University, AL: University of Alabama Press.

  • Martínez, Alberto A. 2009. Kinematics: The lost origins of Einstein’s relativity. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

  • Michelson, Albert A. 1902. Light waves and their uses. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, Arthur I. 2001. Einstein, Picasso. New York: Basic Books.

  • Pyenson, Lewis. 1985. Cultural imperialism and exact sciences: German expansion overseas, 1900–1930. New York: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pyenson, Lewis. 2005. Three graces. In The strength of history at the doors of the new millennium, ed. I. Olábarri, and F. J. Caspistegui, 261–335. Pamplona: Ediciones Universidad de Navarra.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pyenson, Lewis. 2007. The passion of George Sarton: A modern marriage and its discipline. Philadelphia: American Philosophical Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Romein, Jan. 1978. The watershed of two eras: Europe in 1900 (trans. Pomerans, A. J.). Middletown, CT: Wesleyan University Press.

  • Roseman, Mark (ed.). 1995. Generations in conflict: Youth revolt and generation formation in Germany, 1770–1968. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandys, John Edwin. 1967. A history of classical scholarship. 3 Vols., 1st ed., 1903–1908. New York: Hafner.

  • Stansky, Peter. 1996. On or about December 1910: Early Bloomsbury and its intimate world. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, William, and Neil Howe. 1991. Generations: The history of America’s future, 1584 to 2069. New York: Morrow.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lewis Pyenson.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pyenson, L., Johnston, S.F., Martínez, A.A. et al. Revisiting the history of relativity. Metascience 20, 53–73 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11016-010-9466-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11016-010-9466-4

Navigation