Abstract
An examination of the post-Darwinian history of biological taxonomy reveals an implicit assumption that the definitions of taxon names consist of lists of organismal traits. That assumption represents a failure to grant the concept of evolution a central role in taxonomy, and it causes conflicts between traditional methods of defining taxon names and evolutionary concepts of taxa. Phylogenetic definitions of taxon names (de Queiroz and Gauthier 1990) grant the concept of common ancestry a central role in the definitions of taxon names and thus constitute an important step in the development of phylogenetic taxonomy. By treating phylogenetic relationships rather than organismal traits as necessary and sufficient properties, phylogenetic definitions remove conflicts between the definitions of taxon names and evolutionary concepts of taxa. The general method of definition represented by phylogenetic definitions of clade names can be applied to the names of other kinds of composite wholes, including populations and biological species. That the names of individuals (composite wholes) can be defined in terms of necessary and sufficient properties provides the foundation for a synthesis of seemingly incompatible positions held by contemporary individualists and essentialists concerning the nature of taxa and the definitions of taxon names.
Similar content being viewed by others
Bibliography
Ax, P.: 1987, The Phlogenetic System. The Systematization of Organisms on the Basis of Their Phylogenesis, John Wiley, Chichester.
Beatty, J.: 1982, ‘Classes and Cladists’, Systematic Zoology 31, 25–34.
Beckner, M.: 1959. The Biological Way of Thought, Columbia University Press, New York (reprinted by University of California Press, Berkeley, 1968).
Bernier, R.: 1984, ‘The Species as an Individual: Facing Essentialism’, Systematic Zoology 33, 460–469.
Buck, R. C. and D. L. Hull: 1966, ‘The Logical Structure of the Linnaean Hierarchy’, Systematic Zoology 15, 97–111.
Buck, R. C. and D. L. Hull: 1969, ‘Reply to Gregg’, Systematic Zoology 18, 354–357.
Caplan, A. L.: 1981. ‘Back to Class: A Note on the Ontology of Species’, Philosophy of Science 48, 130–140.
Cohen, I. J.: 1974, ‘Professor Hull and the Evolution of Science’, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 25, 334–336.
Cracraft, J.: 1987, ‘Species Concepts and the Ontology of Evolution’, Biology and Philosophy 2, 329–346.
Darwin, C.: 1859, On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, John Murray, London (reprinted by Harvard University Press, Cambridge, 1964).
Dobzhansky, T.: 1937, Genetics and the Origin of Species, Columbia University Press, New York.
Eldredge, N. and J. Cracraft: 1980, Phylogenetic Patterns and the Evolutionary Process, Columbia University Press, New York.
Estes, R., J. Gauthier, and K. de Queiroz: 1988, ‘Phylogenetic Relationships within Squamata’, in R. Estes and G. Pregill (eds.), Phylogenetic Relationships of the lizard Families, Stanford University Press, Stanford, pp. 119–281.
Gauthier, J.: 1986, ‘Saurischian Monophyly and the Origin of Birds’, in K. Padian (ed.), The Origin of Birds and the Evolution of Flight, California Academy of Sciences, San Francisco, pp. 1–55.
Gauthier, J., R. Estes, and K. de Queiroz: 1988a, ‘A Phylogenetic Analysis of Lepidosauromorpha’, in R. Estes and G. Pregill (eds.), Phylogenetic Relationships of the Lizard Families, Stanford University Press, Stanford, pp. 15–98.
Gauthier, J., A. G. Kluge, and T. Rowe: 1988b, ‘Amniote Phylogeny and the Importance of Fossils’, Cladistics 4, 105–209.
Ghiselin, M. T.: 1966a, ‘An Application of the Theory of Definitions to Systematic Principles’, Systematic Zoology 15, 127–130.
Ghiselin, M. T.: 1966b, ‘On Psychologism in the Logic of Taxonomic Controversies’, Systematic Zoology 15, 207–215.
Ghiselin, M. T.: 1969, The Triumph of the Darwinian Method, University of California Press, Berkeley (reprinted by University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1984).
Ghiselin, M. T.: 1974, ‘A Radical Solution to the Species Problem’, Systematic Zoology 23, 536–544.
Ghiselin, M. T.: 1980, ‘Natural Kinds and Literary Accomplishments’, The Michigan Quarterly Review 19, 73–88.
Ghiselin, M. T.: 1981, ‘Categories, Life, and Thinking’, The Behavioral and Brain Sciences 4, 269–313.
Ghiselin, M. T.: 1984, ‘“Definition”, “Character”, and Other Equivocal Terms’, Systematic Zoology 33, 104–110.
Ghiselin, M. T.: 1985, ‘Narrow Approaches to Phylogeny: A Review of Nine Books of Cladism’, Oxford Surveys in Evolutionary Biology 1, 209–222.
Gregg, J. R.: 1950, ‘Taxonomy, language and reality’, The American Naturalist 84, 419–435.
Gregg, J. R.: 1954, The Language of Taxonomy. An Application of Symbolic Logic to the Study of Classificatory Systems, Columbia University Press, New York.
Gregg, J. R.: 1968, ‘Buck and Hull: A Critical Rejoinder’, Systematic Zoology 17, 342–344.
Griffiths, G. C. D.: 1974, ‘On the Foundations of Biological Systematics’, Acta Biotheoretica 23, 85–131.
Hennig, W.: 1965, ‘Phylogenetic Systematics’, Annual Review of Entomology 10, 97–116.
Hennig, W.: 1966, Phylogenetic Systematics, University of Illinois Press, Urbana.
Hennig, W.: 1975, ‘“Cladistic Analysis or Cladistic Classification?” A Reply to Ernst Mayr’, Systematic Zoology 24, 244–256.
Himmelfarb, G.: 1968, Darwin and the Darwinian Revolution, Norton, New York.
Hopson, J. A. and A. W. Crompton: 1969, ‘Origin of Mammals’, Evolutionary Biology 3, 15–72.
Hopwood, A. T.: 1950, ‘Animal Classification from Linnaeus to Darwin’, in Lectures on the Development of Taxonomy, Linnean Society, London, pp. 46–59.
Hull, D. L.: 1965, ‘The Effect of Essentialism on Taxonomy — Two Thousand Years of Stasis (I)’, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 15, 314–326.
Hull, D. L.: 1976, ‘Are Species Really Individuals’, Systematic Zoology 25, 174–191.
Hull, D. L.: 1977, ‘The Ontological Status of Species as Evolutionary Units’, in R. E. Butts and J. Hintikka (eds.), Foundational Problems in the Special Sciences, D. Reidel, Dordrecht, pp. 91–102.
Hull, D. L.: 1978, ‘A Matter of Individuality’, Philosophy of Science 45, 335–360.
Jardine, N.: 1969, ‘A logical basis for biological classification’, Systematic Zoology 18, 37–52.
Kitcher, P.: 1984, ‘Species’, Philosophy of Science 51, 308–333.
Kitts, D. B.: 1983, ‘Can Baptism Alone Save a Species’, Systematic Zoology 32, 27–33.
Kitts, D. B.: 1984, ‘The Names of Species: A Reply to Hull’, Systematic Zoology 33, 112–115.
Kitts, D. B. and D. J. Kitts: 1979, ‘Biological Species as Natural Kinds’, Philosophy of Science 46, 613–622.
Kruskal, J. B.: 1981, ‘What Does Ghiselin Mean by “Individual”?’, The Behavioral and Brain Sciences 4, 294–295.
Losonsky, M.: 1987, ‘Individual Essences’, American Philosophical Quarterly 24, 253–260.
Løvtrup, S.: 1986, ‘On the Existence and Definition of Taxa’, Rivista di Biologia 79, 265–268.
Løvtrup, S.: 1987a, ‘On Species and Other Taxa’, Cladistics 3, 157–177.
Løvtrup, S.: 1987b, ‘On the Species Problem and Some Other Taxonomic Issues’, Environmental Biology of Fishes 20, 3–9.
Mayr, E.: 1982, The Growth of Biological Thought, Belknap Press, Cambridge.
Michaux, B., C. S. White, and D. M. Lambert: 1990, ‘Organisms not Species Evolve: A Reply to Ghiselin ’, Systematic Zoology 39, 79–80.
Mishler, B. D. and R. N. Brandon: 1987, ‘Individuality, Pluralism, and the Phylogenetic Species Concept’, Biology and Philosophy 2, 397–414.
Muir, J. W.: 1968, ‘The Definition of Taxa’, Systematic Zoology 17, 345.
Nelson, G.: 1985, ‘Class and Individual: A Reply to M. Ghiselin’, Cladistics 1, 386–389.
Nelson, G. and N. Platnick: 1981, Systematics and Biogeography. Cladistics and Vicariance, Columbia University Press, New York.
O'Hara, R. J.: 1988, ‘Homage to Clio, or, Toward an Historical Philosophy for Evolutionary Biology’, Systematic Zoology 37, 142–155.
Olson, E. C.: 1959, ‘The Evolutionof Mammalian Characters’, Evolution 13, 344–353.
Patterson, C.: 1978, ‘Verifiability in Systematics’, Systematic Zoology 27, 218–222.
Popper, K. R.: 1950, The Open Society and Its Enemies, Princeton University Press, Princeton [Fifth Edition, 1966].
de Queiroz, K.: 1987, ‘Phylogenetic Systematics of Iguanine Lizards. A Comparative Osteological Study’, University of California Publications in Zoology 118, 1–203.
de Queiroz, K.: 1988, ‘Systematics and Darwinian Revolution’, Philosophy of Science 55, 238–259.
de Queiroz, K. and M. J. Donoghue: 1988, ‘Phylogenetic Systematics and the Species Problem’, Cladistics 4, 317–338.
de Queiroz, K. and M. J. Donoghue: 1990, ‘Phylogenetic Systematics or Nelson's Version of Cladistics’, Cladistics 6, 61–75.
de Queiroz, K. and J. Gauthier: 1990, ‘Phylogeny as a Central Principle in Taxonomy: Phylogenetic Definitions of Taxon Names’, Systematic Zoology 39, 307–322.
de Queiroz, K. and J. Gauthier: 1991, ‘Principles of Phylogenetic Taxonomy: Reorganizing the Taxonomic System around the Central Tenet of Common Descent’, submitted to Systematic Biology.
Ridley, M.: 1986, Evolution and Classification. The Reformation of Cladism, Longman, London.
Rowe, T.: 1987, ‘Definition and Diagnosis in the Phylogenetic System’, Systematic Zoology 36, 208–211.
Rowe, T.: 1988, ‘Definition, Diagnosis, and Origin of Mammalia’, Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 8, 241–264.
Ruse, M.: 1973, The Philosophy of Biology, Hutchinson University Library, London.
Simpson, G. G.: 1959, ‘Mesozoic Mammals and the Polyphyletic Origin of Mammals’, Evolution 13, 405–414.
Simpson, G. G.: 1961, Principles of Animal Taxonomy, Columbia University Press, New York.
Sneath, P. H. A.: 1962, ‘The Construction of Taxonomic Groups’, in G. C. Ainsworth and P. H. A. Sneath (eds.), Microbial Classification, 12th Symposium of the Society for General Microbiology, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 289–332.
Sober, E.: 1988, Reconstructing the Past. Parsimony, Evolution, and Inference, MIT Press, Cambridge.
Stevens, P. E.: 1984, ‘Metaphors and Typology in the Development of Botanical Systematics 1690–1960, Or the Art of Putting New Wine in Old Bottles’, Taxon 33, 169–211.
Suppe, F.: 1974, ‘Some Philosophical Problems in Biological Speciation and Taxonomy’, in J. A. Wojciechowski (ed.), Conceptual Basis of the Classification of Knowledge, Verlag Dokumentation, Pullach/München, pp. 190–243.
Suppe, F.: 1989, The Semantic Conception of Theories and Scientific Realism, University of Illinois Press, Urbana.
Van Valen, L.: 1976, ‘Individualistic Classes’, Philosophy of Science 43, 539–541.
Wiley, E. O.: 1979, ‘An Annotated Linnaean Hierarchy, with Comments on Natural Taxa and Competing Systems’, Systematic Zoology 28, 308–337.
Wiley, E. O.: 1980, ‘Is the Evolutionary Species Fiction? — A Consideration of Classes, Individuals, and Historical Entities’, Systematic Zoology 29, 76–80.
Wiley, E. O.: 1981a, Phylogenetics. The Theory and Practice of Phylogenetic Systematics, John Wiley and Sons, New Yor.
Wiley, E. O.: 1981b, ‘Convex Groups and Consistent Classifications’, Systematic Botany 6, 346–358.
Wiley, E. O.: 1989, ‘Kinds, Individuals, and Theories’, in M. Ruse (ed.), What the Philosophy of Biology Is, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp. 289–300.
Woodger, J. H.: 1952, ‘From Biology to Mathematics’, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 3, 1–21.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
de Queiroz, K. Phylogenetic definitions and taxonomic philosophy. Biol Philos 7, 295–313 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00129972
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00129972