Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The Impact of Situational Influences on Corruption in Organizations

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The literature states that both situational and individual factors contribute to corrupt behavior. This study investigates the influence of rarely empirically investigated situational factors – the size of the bribe, time pressure, and the degree of abstractness of the business code – on the Model of Corrupt Action that describes the subjective decision making process of corrupt actors. To test the effects, I used an experimental simulation design. Only few effects were found. Thus, my results show a certain robustness of corrupt behavior against the examined situational influences. Based on these results, I discuss implications for the prevention of corruption in organizations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ahituv, N., M. Igbaria and A. Sella: 1998, ‘The Effects of Time Pressure and Completeness of Information on Decision Making’, Journal of Management Information Systems 15(2), 153-172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ajzen, I.: 1991, ‘The Theory of Planned Behavior’, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 50(2), 179-211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Albrecht, W. S., E. A. McDermott and T. L. Williams: 1994, ‘Reducing the Cost of Fraud’, The Internal Auditor 51(1), 28-34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Argandoña, A.: 2003, ‘Private-to-Private Corruption’, Journal of Business Ethics 47(3), 253-267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bagozzi, R. P., Dholakia, U. M. (1999) Goal Setting and Goal Striving in Consumer Behavior. Journal of Marketing 63:19–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bagozzi, R. P., U. M. Dholakia and S. Basuroy: 2003, ‘How Effortful Decisions Get Enacted: The Motivating Role of Decision Processes, Desires, and Anticipated Emotions’, Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 16(4), 273-295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bannenberg, B.: 2003, ‘Korruption in Deutschland. Befunde und Konsequenzen’, in V. V. Nell, G. Schwitzgebel and M. Vollet (eds.), Korruption. Interdisziplinäre Zugänge zu einem komplexen Phänomen (Deutscher Universitäts-Verlag, Wiesbaden), pp. 119-136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bannenberg, B. and W. Schaupensteiner: 2004, Korruption in Deutschland (Beck, München).

    Google Scholar 

  • Baucus, M. S.: 1994, ‘Pressure, Opportunity and Predisposition: A Multivariate Model of Corporate Illegality’, Journal of Management 20(4), 699-721.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bommer, M., C. Gratto, J. Gravander and M. Tuttle: 1987, ‘A Behavioral Model of Ethical and Unethical Decision Making’, Journal of Business Ethics 6(4), 265-280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borner, S. and C. Schwyzer: 1999, ‘Bekämpfung der Bestechung im Lichte der Neuen Politischen Ökonomie’, in M. Pieth and P. Eigen (eds.), Korruption im internationalen Geschäftsverkehr: Bestandsaufnahme, Bekämpfung, Prävention (Luchterhand, Neuwied), pp. 17-39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bray, J. H. and S. E. Maxwell: 1982, ‘Analyzing and Interpreting Significant MANOVAs’, Review of Educational Research 52(3), 340-367.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bronner, R.: 1982, Decision Making Under Time Pressure: An Experimental Study of Stress Behavior in Business Management (Lexington Books, Lexington, MA).

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, M. E., L. K. Trevino and D. A. Harrison: 2005, ‘Ethical Leadership: A Social Learning Perspective for Construct Development and Testing’, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 97(2), 117-134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brünner, C.: 1981, ‘Zur Analyse individueller und sozialer Bedingungen von Korruption’, in C. Brünner (ed.), Korruption und Kontrolle (Böhlau, Wien), pp. 677-705.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buckley, M. R., D. S. Wiese and M. G. Harvey: 1998, ‘Identifying Factors Which May Influence Unethical Behavior’, Teaching Business Ethics 2(1), 71-84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carrillo, J. D.: 1999, ‘Corruption in Hierarchies’, Annales d’Economie et de Statistique 59. www.adres.prd.fr/annales/anciensnumeros/resumes/n59/03.pdf. Retrieved 21 Jan 2005.

  • Carrillo, J. D.: 2000, ‘Grafts, Bribes, and the Practice of Corruption’, Journal of Economics and Management Strategy 9(2), 257-286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, A. B.: 1978, ‘Linking Business Ethics to Behavior in Organizations’, SAM Advanced Management Journal 43(3), 4-11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chin, W. W.: 1998, ‘The Partial Least Squares Approach to Structural Equation Modeling’, in G. A. Marcoulides (ed.), Modern Methods for Business Research (Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ), pp. 295-336.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chin, W. W.: 2000, ‘Frequently Asked Questions – Partial Least Squares & PLS-Graph’, http://disc-nt.cba.uh.edu/chin/plsfaq.htm. Retrieved 2 Feb 2008.

  • Coleman, J. W.: 1998, The Criminal Elite. Understanding White-Collar Crime, 4th edition (St. Martin’s Press, New York, NY).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dror, I. E., J. R. Busemeyer and B. Basola: 1999, ‘Decision Making Under Time Pressure: An Independent Test of Sequential Sampling Models’, Memory & Cognition 27(4), 713-725.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dubinsky, A. J. and B. Loken: 1989, ‘Analyzing Ethical Decision Making in Marketing’, Journal of Business Research 19(2), 83-107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edland, A. and O. Svenson: 1993, ‘Judgment and Decision Making Under Time Pressure: Studies and Findings’, in O. Svenson and A. J. Maule (eds.), Time Pressure and Stress in Human Judgment and Decision Making (Plenum Press, New York, NY), pp. 27-40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhardt, K. M.: 1989, ‘Making Fast Strategic Decisions in High-Velocity Environments’, Academy of Management Journal 32(3), 543-576.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferrell, O. C. and L. G. Gresham: 1985, ‘A Contingency Framework for Understanding Ethical Decision Making in Marketing’, Journal of Marketing Management 49(3), 87-96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ford, R. C. and W. D. Richardson: 1994, ‘Ethical Decision Making: A Review of the Empirical Literature’, Journal of Business Ethics 13(3), 205-221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fripp, J.: 1984, ‘Games for Research’, Journal of European Industrial Training 8(3), 17-22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gellerman, S. W.: 1989, ‘Managing Ethics from the Top Down’, Sloan Management Review 30(2), 73-79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goel, R. K. and D. P. Rich: 1989, ‘On the Economic Incentives for Taking Bribes’, Public Choice 61(3), 269-275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gollwitzer, P. M.: 1990, ‘Action Phases and Mind-Sets’, in E. T. Higgins and R. M. Sorrentino (eds.), Handbook of Motivation and Social Cognition. Foundations of Social Behavior, Vol. 2 (Guilford Press, New York, NY), pp. 287-312.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gollwitzer, P. M. and V. Brandstätter: 1997, ‘Implementation Intentions and Effective Goal Pursuit’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 73(1), 186-199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, K. and M. Miyake: 2001, ‘Business Approaches to Combating Bribery: A Study of Codes of Conduct’, Journal of Business Ethics 34(3/4), 161-173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grieger, J.: 2005, ‘Corruption in Organizations: Some Outlines for Research’, Working Paper No. 2003, University of Wuppertal, Department of Economics and Social Sciences, Wuppertal. http://www.wiwi-uni-wuppertal.de/grieger/wp203.pdf. Retrieved 31 July 2007

  • Heckhausen, H.: 1987, ‘Wünschen - wählen – wollen’. In: H. Heckhausen, P. M. Gollwitzer, F. E. Weinert (eds.), Jenseits des Rubikon: Der Wille in den Humanwissenschaften. Springer, Heidelberg, pp. 3-9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heckhausen, H.: 1989, Motivation und Handeln, 2nd edition (Springer, Berlin).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hegarty, W. H. and H. P. Sims: 1978, ‘Some Determinants of Unethical Decision Behavior: An Experiment’, Journal of Applied Psychology 63(4), 451-457.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hegarty, W. H. and H. P. Sims: 1979, ‘Organizational Philosophy, Policies, and Objectives Related to Unethical Decision Behavior: A Laboratory Experiment’, Journal of Applied Psychology 64(3), 331-338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, S. D. and S. J. Vitell: 1986, ‘A General Theory of Marketing Ethics’, Journal of Macromarketing 6(1), 5-16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, T. M.: 1991, ‘Ethical Decision Making by Individuals in Organizations: An Issue-Contingent Model’, The Academy of Management Review 16(2), 366-395.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaptein, M.: 2004, ‘Business Codes of Multinational Firms: What Do They Say?’, Journal of Business Ethics 50(1), 13-31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaptein, M. and M. S. Schwartz: 2008, ‘The Effectiveness of Business Codes: A Critical Examination of Existing Studies and the Development of an Integrated Research Model’, Journal of Business Ethics 77(2), 111-127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kriz, W.: 2005, ‘Planspiel’, in S. Kühl, P. Strodtholz and A. Taffertshofer (eds.), Quantitative Methoden der Organisationsforschung. Ein Handbuch (VS-Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, Wiesbaden), pp. 243-269.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kubal, D., M. Baker and K. Coleman: 2006, ‘Doing the Right Thing: How Today’s Leading Companies are Becoming More Ethical’, Performance Improvement 45(3), 5-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lambsdorff, J. G.: 2002, ‘Making Corrupt Deals: Contracting in the Shadow of the Law’, Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 48(3), 221-241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lane, H. W. and D. G. Simpson: 1984, ‘Bribery in International Business: Whose Problem Is It?’, Journal of Business Ethics 3(1), 35-42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewicki, R. J. and J. A. Litterer: 1985, Negotiation (Irwin, Homewood, IL).

    Google Scholar 

  • Levine, D. P.: 2005, ‘The Corrupt Organization’, Human Relations 58(6), 723-740.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Litzky, B. E., K. A. Eddleston and D. L. Kidder: 2006, ‘The Good, the Bad, and the Misguided: How Managers Inadvertently Encourage Deviant Behaviors’, The Academy of Management Perspectives 20(1), 91-103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loe, T. W., L. Ferrell and P. Mansfield: 2000, ‘A Review of Empirical Studies Assessing Ethical Decision Making in Business’, Journal of Business Ethics 25(3), 185-204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCabe, D. L., L. K. Trevino and K. D. Butterfield: 1996, ‘The Influence of Collegiate and Corporate Codes of Conduct on Ethics-Related Behavior in the Workplace’, Business Ethics Quarterly 6(4), 461-476.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDonald, G.: 2000, ‘Business Ethics: Practical Proposals for Organisations’, Journal of Business Ethics 25(2), 169-184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, T. R., D. Daniels, H. Hopper, J. George-Falvy and G. R. Ferris: 1996, ‘Perceived Correlates of Illegal Behavior in Organizations’, Journal of Business Ethics 15(4), 439-455.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morris, S. A., K. A. Rehbein, J. C. Hosseini and R. L. Armacost: 1995, ‘A Test of Environmental, Situational, and Personal Influences on the Ethical Intentions of CEOs’, Business and Society 34(2), 119-146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Fallon, M. J. and K. D. Butterfield: 2005, ‘A Review of the Empirical Ethical Decision-Making Literature: 1996-2003’, Journal of Business Ethics 59(4), 375-413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orasanu, J.: 1997, ‘Stress and Naturalistic Decision Making: Strengthening the Weak Links’, in R. Flin, E. Salas, M. Strub and L. Martin (eds.), Decision Making Under Stress (Ashgate, Aldershot), pp. 43-66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perugini, M. and R. P. Bagozzi: 2001, ‘The Role of Desires and Anticipated Emotions in Goal-Directed Behaviours: Broadening and Deepening the Theory of Planned Behaviour’, British Journal of Social Psychology 40(1), 79-98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perugini, M. and R. P. Bagozzi: 2004, ‘The Distinction Between Desires and Intentions’, European Journal of Social Psychology 34(1), 69-84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piliavin, I., R. Gartner, C. Thornton and R. L. Matsueda: 1986, ‘Crime Deterrence and Rational Choice’, American Sociological Review 51(1), 101-119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Powpaka, S.: 2002, ‘Factors Affecting Managers’ Decision to Bribe: An Empirical Investigation’, Journal of Business Ethics 40(3), 227-246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rabl, T.: 2008, Private Corruption and its Actors - Insights into the Subjective Decision Making Processes (Pabst, Lengerich).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rabl, T. and T. M. Kühlmann: 2008, ‘Understanding Corruption in Organizations - Development and Empirical Assessment of an Action Model’, Journal of Business Ethics 82(2), 477-495.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rest, J. R.: 1986, Moral Development: Advances in Research and Theory (Praeger, New York, NY).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ringle, C. M., S. Wende and A. Will: 2005, SmartPLS 2.0 (beta) (University of Hamburg, Hamburg). www.smartpls.de.

  • Rose-Ackerman, S.: 1975, ‘The Economics of Corruption’, Journal of Public Economics 4(2), 187-203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schilling, A.: 2004, ‘Korruption im Wirtschaftssystem Deutschland: Auswirkungen, Präventionsstrategien und ethische Betrachtung’, in A. Schilling and U. Dolata (eds.), Korruption im Wirtschaftssystem Deutschland. Jeder Mensch hat seinen Preis (Mankau, Murnau a. Staffelsee), pp. 15-102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumann, P. L., T. W. Scott and P. H. Anderson: 2006, ‘Designing and Introducing Ethical Dilemmas into Computer-Based Business Simulations’, Journal of Management Education 30(1), 195-219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, M. S.: 2004, ‘Effective Corporate Codes of Ethics: Perceptions of Code Users’, Journal of Business Ethics 55(4), 323-343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sims, R. R.: 1992, ‘The Challenge of Ethical Behavior in Organizations’, Journal of Business Ethics 11(7), 505-513.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stead, W. E., D. L. Worrell and J. G. Stead: 1990, ‘An Integrative Model for Understanding and Managing Ethical Behavior in Business Organizations’, Journal of Business Ethics 9(3), 233-242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stoner, C. R.: 1989, ‘The Foundations of Business Ethics: Exploring the Relations’, SAM Advanced Management Journal 54(3), 38-43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tang, T. L. and Y. Chen: 2008, ‘Intelligence vs. Wisdom: The Love of Money, Machiavellianism, and Unethical Behavior Across College Major and Gender’, Journal of Business Ethics 82(1), 1-26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tanzi, V.: 1998, ‘Corruption Around the World: Causes, Consequences, Scope, and Cures’, International Monetary Fund Staff Papers 45(4), 559-594.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Treisman, D.: 2000. ‘The Causes of Corruption: A Cross-National Study’, Journal of Public Economics 76(3), 399-457.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trevino, L. K.: 1986, ‘Ethical Decision Making in Organizations: A Person-Situation Interactionist Model’, The Academy of Management Review 11(3), 601-617.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trevino, L. K. and S. A. Youngblood: 1990, ‘Bad Apples in Bad Barrels: A Causal Analysis of Ethical Decision-Making Behavior’, Journal of Applied Psychology 75(4), 378-385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vahlenkamp, W. and I. Knauß: 1995, Korruption - Hinnehmen oder handeln? (Bundeskriminalamt, Wiesbaden).

    Google Scholar 

  • Vogt, A. O.: 1997, Korruption im Wirtschaftsleben. Eine betriebswirtschaftliche Schaden-Nutzen-Analyse (Deutscher Universitäts-Verlag, Wiesbaden).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wotruba, T. R., L. B. Chonko and T. W. Loe: 2001, ‘The Impact of Ethics Code Familiarity on Manager Behavior’, Journal of Business Ethics 33(1), 59-69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zakay, D.: 1993, ‘The Impact of Time Perception Processes on Decision Making Under Time Stress’, in O. Svenson and A. J. Maule (eds.), Time Pressure and Stress in Human Judgment and Decision Making (Plenum Press, New York, NY), pp. 59-72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zelditch, M. J. and W. M. Evan: 1962, ‘Simulated Bureaucracies: A Methodological Analysis’, in H. Guetzkow (ed.), Simulation in Social Science (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ), pp. 48-60.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tanja Rabl.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rabl, T. The Impact of Situational Influences on Corruption in Organizations. J Bus Ethics 100, 85–101 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-0768-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-0768-2

Key words

Navigation