Skip to main content
Log in

Preface

  • Published:
Synthese Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

REFERENCES

  • Barth, E. M. and E. C. W. Krabbe: 1982, From Axiom to Dialogue. A Philosophical Study of Logics and Argumentation, de Gruyter, Berlin, Wien, New York.

  • Belnap, N.: 1982, ‘Display Logic’, Journal of Philosophical Logic 4, 375-418.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beth, E. W.: 1955, ‘Semantic Entailment and Formal Derivability’, Mededelingen van de Koninklijke Nederlandse Akademie van Wetenschappen, Afdeling Letterkunde 18, 309-342.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blass, A.: 1992, ‘A Game Semantics for Linear Logic’, Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 56, 183-220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blass, A.: 1997, ‘Some Semantical Aspects of Linear Logic’, Journal of the Interest Group in Pure and Applied Logic 5, 487-503.

    Google Scholar 

  • Došen, K.: 1988, ‘Sequent Systems and Groupoid Models I’, Studia Logica 47, 353-389.

    Google Scholar 

  • Felscher, W.: 1986, ‘Dialogues as a Foundation for Intuitionistic Logics’, in D. M. Gabbay and F. Guenthner (eds), Handbook of Philosophical Logic, Vol. III, D. Reidel, Dordrecht, pp. 341-372.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitting, M.: 1983, Proof Methods for Modal and Intuitionistic Logics, D. Reidel, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitting, M.: 1993, ‘Basic Modal Logic’, in D.M. Gabbay, C. J. Hogger and J. A. Robinson (eds), Handbook of Logic in Artificial Intelligence and Logic Programming, Clarendon Press, Oxford, pp. 365-448.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gabbay, D. M.: 1996, Labelled Deductive Systems, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gethmann, C. F.: 1979, Protologik. Untersuchungen zur formalen Semantik von Begründungsdiskursen, Frankfurt a. M., Suhrkamp.

  • Girard, J.-Y.: 1993, ‘Linear Logic: Its Syntax and Semantics’, in J.-Y. Girard, Y. Lafont and L. Regnier (eds), Advances in Linear Logic, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 1-42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Girard, J.-Y.: 1998a, ‘On the Meaning of Logical Rules I: Syntax vs. Semantics’, (unpublished manuscript).

  • Girard, J.-Y.: 1998b, ‘On the Meaning of Logical Rules II: Multiplicatives and Additives’, unpublished manuscript.

  • Hamblin, C. L.: 1970, Fallacies, Methuen, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hintikka, J.: 1996, The Principles of Mathematics Revisited, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hintikka, J.: 1996-1998, Selected Papers, Vols. I-IV, Kluwer, Dordrecht, Boston, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hintikka, J. and G. Sandu: 1996, ‘A Revolution in Logic?’, Nordic Journal of Philosophical Logic 1, 169-183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hyland, M.: 1997, ‘Game Semantics’, in A. Pitts and P. Dybjer (eds), Semantics and Logics of Computation, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 131-182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, R. H.: 1999, ‘The Relation between Formal and Informal Logic’, Argumentation 13, 265-274.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorenz, K.: 1981, ‘Dialogical Logic’, in: W. Marciszewski (ed.), Dictionary of Logic as Applied in the Study of Language. Concepts/Methods/Theories, Nijhoff, The Hague, Boston, London, pp. 117-125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorenzen, P.: 1958, ‘Logik und Agon’, Arti del XII Congresso Internationale de Filosofia, Venezia, pp. 187-194. (Reprinted in Lorenzen and Lorenz 1978, 1-8.)

  • Lorenzen, P. and K. Lorenz: 1978, Dialogische Logik,Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, Darmstadt.

  • Naess, A.: 1966, Communication and Argument. Elements of Applied Semantics, Universitaetsforlaget, Allen & Unwin, Oslo, London.

  • Perelman, C. and L. Olbrechts-Tyteca: 1958, La Nouvelle Rhétorique, Presses Universitaires de France, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prakken, H. and G. Vreeswijk: 1999, ‘Logics for Defeasible Argumentation’, to appear in D. M. Gabbay and F. Guenthner (eds), Handbook of Philosophical Logic, 2nd edn, D. Reidel, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rahman, S.: 1999a, ‘Ways of Understanding Hugh MacColl's Concept of Symbolic Existence’, to appear in Nordic Journal of Philosophical Logic.

  • Rahman, S.: 1999b, ‘On Frege's Nightmare. A Combination of Intuitionistic, Free and Paraconsistent Logics’, to appear in H. Wansing (ed.), Essays on Non-Classical Logic, King's College University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rahman, S. and W. A. Carnielli: 1998, ‘The Dialogical Approach to Paraconsistency’, FR 5.1 Philosophie, Universität des Saarlandes, Memo No. 8. Also to appear in D. Krause (ed.), Essays on Paraconsistency, Kluwer, Dordrecht, Boston, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rahman, S. and J. A. Roetti: 1999, ‘Dual Intuitionistic Paraconsistency without Ontological Commitments’, presented at the International Congress: Analytic Philosophy at the Turn of the Millennium in Santiago de Compostela (Spain), 1-4 December 1999.

  • Rahman, S. and H. Rückert: 1999, ‘Dialogische Modallogik (für T, B, S4, und S5)’, to appear in Logique et Analyse.

  • Rahman, S., H. Rückert and M. Fischmann: 1999, ‘On Dialogues and Ontology. The Dialogical Approach to Free Logic’, to appear in Logique et Analyse.

  • Rückert, H.: 1999, ‘Why Dialogical Logic?’, in H. Wansing (ed.), Essays on Non-Classical Logic, King's College University Press, Oxford, to appear.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schröder-Heister, P.: 1999, ‘Substructural Logics’, to appear in D. M. Gabbay and F. Guenthner (eds), Handbook of Philosophical Logic, 2nd edn, D. Reidel, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toulmin, S.: 1958, The Uses of Argument, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walton, D. N.: 1984, Logical Dialogue-Games and Fallacies, University Press of America, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walton, D. N.: 1985, ‘New Directions in the Logic of Dialogue’, in D. N. Walton (ed.), The Logic of Dialogue, Synthese 63, 259-274.

  • Wansing, H.: 1994, ‘Sequent Calculi for Normal Modal Propositional Logics’, Journal of Logic Computation 4, 125-142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wansing, H.: 1998, Displaying Modal Logic, D. Reidel, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woods, J.: 1988, ‘Ideals of Rationality in Dialogic’, Argumentation 2, 395-408.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rahman, S., Rückert, H. Preface. Synthese 127, 1–6 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010314319474

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010314319474

Navigation