Abstract
Farmer participatory approaches were used to identify problems and needs as perceived by local people and to develop strategies to achieve fodder security in south Indian villages. Indigenous knowledge systems as they relate to agroforestry were explored. The farmer participatory approaches have laid the foundations for selecting appropriate agroforestry technologies and developing suitable fodder security policy options. Potential benefits and risks as a result of implementing agroforestry projects were also discussed.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Atta-Krah, A. N.Agroforestry systems for smallholder upland farmers in a land reform area of the Philippines: the Taban go case study. Nairobi, Kenya: ICRAF, 1984.
Babu, S. C. and B. Rajasekaran. “Agroforestry, attitude towards risk and nutritional availability: A case study of South Indian Farming Systems.”Agroforestry Systems Vol. 19, No. 1, 1991, pp. 1–16.
Chambers, R. “Micro-environments unobserved.”IIED Gatekeeper Series No. 22. London: International Institute of Environment and Development, 1990.
Collinson, M. “Farming systems research: Procedures for technology development.”Experimental Agriculture, Vol. 23, No. 7, pp. 365–386, 1987.
Conway, G., A. McCracken, and J. Pretty. “Training notes for analysis and rapid rural appraisal. Sustainable Agricultural Programme.” London: International Institute for Environment and Development, 1987.
Cook, C. and M. Grut. “Agroforestry in Sub-Saharan Africa — A farmers' perspective.”World Bank Technical Paper No. 112. Washington, DC: The World Bank, 1989.
Desai, M. Personal communication dt. 9. 21. 91. Madras, India, 1991.
Gnanadeepa, A. Techno-cultural profile of rice farmers. Unpublished M.Sc. (Ag) Thesis, Coimbatore, India: Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, 1991.
Khaleque, K. “Growing multipurpose fruit trees in Bangladesh: farmers' perceptions of opportunities and obstacles.” InMultipurpose tree species for small-farm use, by D. Withingtonet al. (eds.) Ottawa, Canada: Winrock International for Agricultural Development and International Development Research Center, 1988.
Lakshmanan, S. “Growing forest trees.” [in Tamil].Thuglak, Vol 13, No. 6, pp. 28–31, 1989.
Mathias-Mundy, E, O. Muchena, G. McKieman, and P. Mundy. “Indigenous technical knowledge on private tree management.” Rome, Italy: Food and Agriculture Organization of the UN, 1987.
Messerschmidt, D. Community forestry management and the opportunities of local tradition: A view from Nepal. Unpublished draft, 1989.
Mukundan, G. and S. Balakrishnan. “Integration of small ruminants and tree cropping in south India.” InSmall ruminant production systems in south and southeast Asia, C. Devendra (ed.). Ottawa: Canada: International Development Research Center, 1987.
Muller, E. U. and S. J. Scherr. “Planning technical interventions in agroforestry projects.”Agroforestry Systems, Vol. 11, No. 1, pp. 23–24, 1990.
Pradeepmani, D. “Introducing multipurpose trees on small farms in Nepal.” InMultipurpose tree species for smallfarm use, by D. Withingtonet al. (eds.) Ottawa, Canada: Winrock International for Agricultural Development and International Development Research Center, 1988.
Pretty, J. and R. Sandbrook. “Operationalising sustainable development at the community level: Primary environmental care.” Paper presented at the DAC Working Party on Development Assistance and the Environment, London, October, 1991.
Rajasekaran, B. and R. A. Martin. “Organization and management of local institutions for sustainability of Training and Visit extension programs in developing countries.” Paper presented at the Ninth Annual Farming Systems Research and Extension Conference, Fayetteville, Arkansas, 1989.
Rajasekaran B, D. M. Warren, and S. C. Babu. “Indigenous natural-resource management systems for sustainable agricultural development-A global perspective.”Journal of International Development, Vol. 3, No. 1: 1–15, 1991.
Reddiyar, R. Personal Communication. dt. 9. 12. 91. Sivaranthagam, Pondicherry, India, 1991.
Rocheleau. D. “The user perspective and the agroforestry research and action agenda.” Paper presented at Workshop on farmers and agricultural research: complementary methods. Institute of Development Studies, University of Sussex, 1987.
Sainju, M. M. Key note address. Nineth Annual Farming Systems Research/Extension Symposium, Arkansas, 1989.
Thapa, B. L. Joshi L., I. B. Karki, R. K. Kusle, Y. N. Jha, and M. P. Manali. “Tree planting and livestock don't mix or do they.”Agroforestry Today Vol. 3, No. 2, pp. 11–13, 1991.
Thrupp, L. “Legitimizing Local Knowledge: Scientized Packages or Empowerment for Third World People.” InIndigenous Knowledge Systems: Implications for Agriculture and International Development, D. Michael Warren, L. Jan Slikkerveer, and S. O. Titilola (eds.). Studies in Technology and Social Change No. 11. Ames: Iowa State University, 1989.
Warren D. M.Indigenous Knowledge and Development. Washington, DC: The World Bank, 1991.
Additional information
Dr. B. Rajasekaran is Information Scientist for Agriculture in the Consortium for International Earth Science Information Network (CIESIN), Saginaw, Michigan. He also coordinates CIESIN Human Dimensions Kiosk, an electronic forum to facilitate information sharing on the human dimensions of global environmental change. Dr. Rajasekaran has conducted a number of research projects on indigenous knowledge as it relates to agriculture, food security, and natural resource management.
Dr. D. Michael. Warren is Professor of Anthropology and Director of the Center for Indigenous Knowledge for Agriculture and Rural Development (CIKARD) at Iowa State University. He has been involved in numerous international development assignments in agriculture and rural development for a variety of international development agencies.
Dr. S. C. Babu is Senior Research Fellow and Head, Training and Capacity Building Unit at the International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI), Washington, DC.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rajasekaran, B., Warren, D.M. & Babu, S.C. Farmer participatory approaches to achieve fodder security in south Indian villages. Agric Hum Values 11, 159–167 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01530457
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01530457