Abstract
This article examines how the Kashmiri non-dualistic Śaiva philosophers Utpaladeva (tenth century) and Abhinavagupta (10th–11th centuries) present and criticize a theory expounded by certain Buddhist philosophers, identified by the two Śaiva authors as Sautrāntikas. According to this theory, no entity external to consciousness can ever be perceived since perceived objects are nothing but internal aspects (ākāra) of consciousness. Nonetheless we must infer the existence of external entities so as to account for the fact that consciousness is aware of a variety of objects: just as a mirror takes on a variegated appearance only by reflecting a multiplicity of objects that remain external to it, in the same way, phenomenal variety can be explained only by assuming the existence of various objects external to consciousness. In Īśvarapratyabhijñākārikās I, 5, 8–9 and their commentaries, Utpaladeva and Abhinavagupta endeavour to criticize this theory, which challenges their own idealistic principles: according to them, the Sautrāntikas’ inference is neither legitimate nor even possible. The passage is particularly telling as regards the strategy developed by Pratyabhijñā philosophers with respect to their Buddhist opponents: they make use of certain arguments propounded by Dharmakīrti in defense of Vijñānavāda in order to criticize the Sautrāntikas’ inference, but they also exploit this discussion to underline the superiority of their idealism over that of the Vijñānavādins.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Primary Sources (a): Manuscripts
D = Īśvarapratyabhijñāvimarśinī, Vṛtti and Vivṛti, Delhi, National Archives of India (Manuscripts belonging to the Archaeology and Research Department, Jammu and Kashmir Government, Srinagar), no. 30, vol. 9 [‘‘Pratyabhijñāvivṛtiḥ by Utpaladeva,” paper, śāradā].
J = Īśvarapratyabhijñāvimarśinī, Jammu, Sri Ranbir Institute, Raghunath mandir, no. 19 [birch bark, śāradā].
L = Īśvarapratyabhijñāvimarśinī, Lucknow, Akhila Bhāratīya Saṃskrṛta Pariṣad, no. 3366 [‘‘Pratyabhijñāsūtravimarśinī laghvī,” [Saptarṣi]saṃvat [49]42, Vikramasaṃvat 1823 (= 1766 CE)59, paper, śāradā].
NBṬ = [Nyāyabinduṭīkā] Dharmottarapradīpa (being a sub-commentary on Dharmottara’s Nyāyabinduṭīkā, a commentary on Dharmakīrti’s Nyāyabindu), edited by D. Malvania, Patna: Kashi Prasad Jayaswal Research Institute, 1955.
P = Īśvarapratyabhijñāvimarśinī, Poona, Bhandarkar Oriental Institute (BORI), no. 466 of 1875–76 [‘‘Īśvarapratyabhijñāsūtravimarśinī,” birch bark, śāradā].
S1 = Īśvarapratyabhijñāvimarśinī, Śrinagar, Oriental Research Library, no. 816 = DSO 00001 5659 [paper, śāradā].
S2 = Īśvarapratyabhijñāvimarśinī, Śrinagar, Oriental Research Library, no. 1035 = DSO 00001 8219 [paper, śāradā].
SOAS = Īśvarapratyabhijñāvimarśinī, London, School of Oriental and African Studies (SOAS) Library, no. 44255 [‘‘Pratyabhijñāsūtra with Abhinavagupta’s Sūtrārthavimarśinī,” paper, śāradā].
Primary Sources (b): Editions
[Bhāskarī] Īśvarapratyabhijñāvimarśinī of Abhinavagupta, Doctrine of Divine Recognition, vol. I & II: Sanskrit text with the Commentary Bhāskarī edited by K. A. S. Iyer and K. C. Pandey [Allahabad,1938, 1950], vol. III: English translation by K. C. Pandey [Allahabad, 1954], Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass, 1986.
HB = Dharmakīrtis Hetubindu, Teil I, Tibetischer Text und rekonstruierter Sanskrit-Text, edited by E. Steinkellner, Wien: Österreichische Akademie der Wissenschaften, 1967.
ĪPK, Vrṛtti = Īśvarapratyabhijñākārikā of Utpaladeva with the Author’s Vrṛtti, critical edition and annotated translation by R. Torella, [Roma, 1994], corrected edition, Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass, 2002.
ĪPV = Īśvarapratyabhijñāvimarśinī, edited with notes by M. K. Shāstrī, 2 vols, Kashmir Series of Texts and Studies 22 & 33, Srinagar: Nirnaya Sagar Press, 1918–1921.
ĪPVV = Īśvarapratyabhijñāvivṛtivimarśinī by Abhinavagupta, edited by M. K. Shāstrī, 3 vols, Kashmir Series of Texts and Studies 60, 62 & 65, Bombay: Nirnaya Sagar Press, 1938–1943.
NM =Nyāyamañjarī of Jayanta Bhaṭṭa, with ṭippaṇi – Nyāyasaurabha by the editor, edited by K. S. Varadacharya, 2 vols, Oriental Research Institute Series 116 & 139, Mysore, 1969-1983.
NM (K) = Nyāyamañjarī, Vijñānādvaitavāda Section: see Kataoka 2003.
PV = Pramāṇavārttika-kārikā (Sanskrit and Tibetan), edited by Y. Miyasaka, Acta Indologica2 (pp. 1-206), 1971-1972.
PVin = Dharmakīrti’s Pramāṇaviniścaya. Chapters 1 and 2, critically edited by E. Steinkellner, Beijing / Vienna: China Tibetology Publishing House, Austrian Academy of Sciences Press, 2007.
SDS = Sarva-darśana-saṃgraha of Sāyaṇa-Mādhava, edited with an original commentary in Sanskrit by V. S. Abhyankar, third edition, Poona: Bhandarkar Oriental Research Institute, [1924], 1978.
Secondary Sources
Alper H. P. (1987). Svabhāvam avabhāsasya vimarśam: Judgment as a transcendental category in Utpaladeva’s Śaiva Theology. Adyar Library Bulletin 51 176–241.
Arnold D. (2008). Buddhist idealism, epistemic and otherwise: Thoughts on the alternating perspectives of Dharmakīrti. Sophia 47 3–28.
Dunne J. D. (2004). Foundations of Dharmakīrti’s philosophy. Boston: Wisdom Publications.
Eltschinger, V. (2009). On the career and the cognition of Yogins. In E. Franco (Ed.), Yogic perception, meditation and altered states of consciousness (pp.169–213). Wien: Verlag der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften.
Hattori, M. (1968). Dignāga, on perception, being the Pratyakṣapariccheda of Dignāga’s Pramāṇasamuccaya. Harvard Oriental Series (Vol. 47). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Inami, M. (1999). On the determination of causality. In S. Katsura (Ed.), Dharmakīrti’s thought and its impact on Indian and Tibetan Philosophy. Proceedings of the third international Dharmakīrti conference (pp.131–154). Wien: Verlag der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften.
Kataoka, K. (2003). Critical edition of the Vijñānādvaitavāda Section of Bhaṭṭa Jayanta’s Nyāyamañjarī. Tōyō Bunka Kenkyūsho Kiyō, 144, S 318-278.
Katsura, S. (1991). Dignāga and Dharmakīrti on apoha. In E. Steinkellner (Ed.), Studies in the Buddhist epistemological tradition. Proceedings of the second international Dharmakīrti conference, Vienna, June 11–16, 1989 (pp. 129–146). Wien: Verlag der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften.
Krasser, H. (1999). Dharmakīrti’s and Kumārila’s refutations of the existence of God: A consideration of their chronological order. In S. Katsura (Ed.), Dharmakīrti’s thought and its impact on Indian and Tibetan Philosophy. Proceedings of the third international Dharmakīrti conference (pp.215–24). Wien: Verlag der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften.
Krasser, H. (2004). Are Buddhist Pramāṇavādins non-Buddhistic? Dignāga and Dharmakīrti on the impact of logic and epistemology on emancipation. Hōrin, 11, 129–146.
Kritzer R. (2003) General introduction [to the issue entitled The Sautrāntikas]. Journal of the International Association of Buddhist Studies 26(2): 201–224
Kritzer R. (2003b) Sautrāntika in the Abhidharmakośabhāṣya. Journal of the International Association of Buddhist Studies 26(2): 331–384
Kritzer, R. (2005). Vasubandhu and the Yogācārabhūmi. Yogācāra elements in the Abhidharmakośabhāṣya. Studia Philologica Buddhica, Monograph Series 18. Tokyo: The International Institute for Buddhist Studies.
Lasic, H. (1999). Dharmakīrti and his successors on the determination of causality. In S. Katsura (Ed.), Dharmakīrti’s thought and its impact on Indian and Tibetan Philosophy. Proceedings of the third international Dharmakīrti conference (pp. 233–242). Wien: Verlag der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften.
Nenniger C. (1994) sāmānyato dṛṣṭam anumānam—Analogical reasoning in early Nyāya-Vaiśeṣika. Asiatische Studien/études Asiatiques 48(2): 819–832
Pind, O. (1991). Dignāga on śabdasāmānya and śabdaviśeṣa. In E. Steinkellner (Ed.), Studies in the Buddhist Epistemological Tradition. Proceedings of the second international Dharmakīrti conference, Vienna, June 11–16, 1989 (pp. 269–280). Wien: Verlag der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften.
Preisendanz K. (1989) On ātmendriyamanorthasannikarṣa and the Nyāya-Vaiśeṣika Theory of Vision. Berliner Indologische Studien 4–5: 141–213
Ratié, I. (2006). La Mémoire et le Soi dans l’Īśvarapratyabhijñāvimarśinī d’Abhinavagupta. Indo-Iranian Journal, 49(1–2), 39–103.
Ratié I. (2007) Otherness in the Pratyabhijñā philosophy. Journal of Indian Philosophy 35(4): 313–370
Ratié I. (2010a) The Dreamer and the Yogin—On the relation between Buddhist and Śaiva idealisms. Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies 73(3): 437–478
Ratié I. (2010b) ‘A five-trunked, four-tusked elephant is running in the sky’—How free is imagination according to Utpaladeva and Abhinavagupta?.. Études Asiatiques/Asiatische Studien 64(2): 341–385
Tillemans, T. (2011). How to talk about ineffable things: Dignāga and Dharmakīrti on apoha. In A. Chakrabarti, M. Siderits, T. Tillemans (Eds.), Apoha: Buddhist nominalism and human cognition (pp. 50–60). New York: Columbia University Press.
Torella, R. (1992). The Pratyabhijñā and the Logical-Epistemological School of Buddhism. In: Goudriaan T. (ed) Ritual and speculation in Early Tantrism, Studies in Honor of André Padoux (pp. 327–345). Albany, SUNY Press.
Torella, R. (2002). See ĪPK.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ratié, I. Can One Prove that Something Exists Beyond Consciousness? A Śaiva Criticism of the Sautrāntika Inference of External Objects. J Indian Philos 39, 479–501 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10781-011-9143-y
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10781-011-9143-y