Skip to main content
Log in

Industrial cultural determinants of technological developments: Skill transfer or power transfer?

  • Published:
AI & SOCIETY Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper discusses the social effects resulting from the transfer of knowledge and skill both in the spheres of production and machine design. Relevant design determinants and their impact on technological developments are discussed within the theoretical framework of industrial cultures. Two types of skill transfer are analysed in connection with different production philosophies — one more Tayloristic, the other more workshop-oriented. Finally, the paper discusses the relation of both philosophies to the requirements of future production concepts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ammon, R., Liese, S., Witte H. and Raether, C. (1987). Neue Systeme für werkstattorientierte Programmierverfahren.wt Werkstattstechnik, 9, 501–504.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anon. (1988), Letzte Chance der Europäer in USA. Modern Fertigung, 4, 48–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blankertz, H. (1969)Bildung im Zeitalter der großen Industrie. Hannover.

  • Böhle, F. and Milkau, B. (1988).Vom Handrad zum Bildschirm. Campus, Frankfurt/New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braverman, H. (1977).Die Arbeit im modernen Produktionsprozeß. Campus, Frankfurt/New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, S. S. and Zysman, J. (1988). Manufacturing innovation and American industrial competitiveness.Science, 239, 1110–1114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooley, M. (1988). Creativity, skill and human-centred systems. In Göranzon and Josefson (eds)Knowledge, Skill and Artificial Intelligence. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dreyfus, H. L. and Dreyfus, S. E. (1987).Künstliche Intelligenz. Rowohlt, Reinbek.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, K. R. (1958). Machine-tools. In Singer, Holmyard, Hall and Williams (eds)A History of Technology. Clarendon Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, J. A. (1987). Situation des Werkzeugmaschinenbaus in den USA.Werkstatt und Betrieb, 10, 754–756.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habig, G. (1988). Struktur- und Wettbewerbsverschiebungen auf den internationalen Werkzeugmas-chinen-Märkten.Werkstatt und Betrieb, 1, 6–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Häuser, K. (1982). Entwicklungsstufen der Drehmaschine,Technica, 4, 274–290.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hellige, H. D. (1984). Die gesellschaftlichen und historischen Grundlagen der Technikgestaltung als Gegenstand der Ingenieurausbildung. In Troitzsch and König (eds)Lernen aus der Technikgeschichte. VDI-Verlag, Düsseldorf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirschhorn, L. (1984).Beyond Mechanization. MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaikumar, R. (1986). Postindustrial manufacturing.Harvard Business Review, 11/12, 69–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplinsky, R. (1984).Automation. Longman, Essex.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kern, H. and Schumann, M. (1986).Das Ende der Arbeitsteilung? C. H. Beck, München.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuby, Th. (1980).Vom Handwerksinstrument zum Maschinensystem. Technische Universität Berlin.

  • Landes, D. S. (1983).Der entfesselte Prometheus. dtv, München.

  • Malsch, Th. (1987). Die Informatisierung des betrieblichen Erfahrungswissens und der “Imperialismus der instrumentellen Vernunft”.Zeitschrift für Soziologie, 2, 77–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maurice, M., Sorge, A. and Warner, M. (1980). Societal differences in organising manufacturing units: A comparison of France, West Germany and Great Britain.Organization Studies, 1, 59–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noble, D. F. (1986).Forces of Production. A Social History of Industrial Automation. Oxford University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norman, D. A. and Draper S. W. (eds) (1986).User Centred System Design. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ontario Ministry of Industry, Trade and Technology. Innovation and Technology Division (1985).Flexible Automation Equipment. Queens Printer, Ontario.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piore, M. J. and Sabel, C. F. (1985).Das Ende der Massenproduktion. Wagenbach, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rauner, F., Rasmussen, L. and Corbett, J. M. (1988). The social shaping of technology and work: human centred CIM systems.AI & Society, 1, 47–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sachverständigenkommission Arbeit und Technik (1986).Forschungsperspektiven zum Problemfeld Arbeit und Technik. Verlag Neue Gesellschaft, Bonn.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sorge, A., Hartmann, G. Warner, M. and Nicholas, I. (1982).Mikroelektronik und Arbeit in der Industrie. Campus, Frankfurt/New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sweezy, P. and Dobb, M. et al. (1978).Der Übergang vom Feudalismus zum Kapitalismus. Syndikat, Frankfurt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thurow, L. C. (1987). A weakness in process Technology.Science, 238, 1659–1663.

    Google Scholar 

  • VDMA (Fachgemeinschaft Werkzeugmaschinen) (1987).Werkzeugmaschinen-Statistik 1986. Frankfurt.

  • Vernon, R. (1986). Can US manufacturing come back?Harvard Business Review, 6/7, 98–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Volpert, W. (1988).Zauberlehrlinge. DTV, München.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rauner, F., Ruth, K. Industrial cultural determinants of technological developments: Skill transfer or power transfer?. AI & Soc 3, 88–102 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01891320

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01891320

Keywords

Navigation