Skip to main content
Log in

Legitimacy-Seeking Organizational Strategies in Controversial Industries: A Case Study Analysis and a Bidimensional Model

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Controversial industry sectors, such as alcohol, gambling, and tobacco, though long-established, suffer organizational legitimacy problems. The authors consider various strategies used to seek organizational legitimacy in the U.K. casino gambling market. The findings are based on a detailed, multistakeholder case study pertaining to a failed bid for a regional supercasino. They suggest four generic strategies for seeking organizational legitimacy in this highly complex context: construing, earning, bargaining, and capturing, as well as pathways that combine these strategies. The case analysis and proposed bidimensional model of generic legitimacy-seeking strategies contribute to limited literature on organizational legitimacy in controversial industry sectors. In addition, beyond organizations active in controversial contexts, this study and its implications are useful for individuals and organizations supporting or opposing the organizational legitimacy of organizations in controversial industries.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aldrich, H. E., & Fiol, C. M. (1994). Fools rush in? The institutional context of industry creation. Academy of Management Review, 19(2), 645–670.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashforth, B. E., & Gibbs, B. W. (1990). The double-edge of organizational legitimation. Organization Science, 1(2), 177–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beelitz, A., & Merkl-Davies, D. (2012). Using discourse to restore organisational legitimacy: ‘CEO-speak’ after an incident in a German nuclear power plant. Journal of Business Ethics, 108(1), 101–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brogan, B., & Merrick, J. (2007). Brown kills off Blair’s supercasino plans. Daily Mail, July 12. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-467743/Brown-kills-Blairs-supercasino-plans.html. Accessed 3 September 2012.

  • Byrne, E. (2007). Assessing arms makers corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 74(2), 201–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Byrne, E. (2010). The U.S. military-industrial complex is circumstantially unethical. Journal of Business Ethics, 95(2), 153–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, J. L. (2007). Why would corporations behave in socially responsible ways? An institutional theory of corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Review, 32(3), 946–967.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Casino Advisory Panel. (2007). Final report of the Casino Advisory Panel, UK Government Department for Culture Media and Sport. http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20090213101914/. http://culture.gov.uk/cap/publications/finalreportcap_300107.pdf. Accessed 3 September 2012.

  • Clark, A., & Muir, H. (2007). Be vigilant when dealing with Kerzner, gaming chief tells Britain. The Guardian, February 3. http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2007/feb/03/communities.gambling1. Accessed 3 September 2012.

  • DeColle, S., & York, J. G. (2009). Why wine is not glue? The unresolved problem of negative screening in socially responsible investing. Journal of Business Ethics, 85(Suppl 1), 83–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deegan, C. (2002). The legitimating effect of social and environmental disclosures: A theoretical foundation. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 15(3), 281–311.

    Google Scholar 

  • DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dowling, J., & Pfeffer, J. (1975). Organizational legitimacy: Social values and organizational behaviour. Pacific Sociological Review, 18(1), 122–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Du, S., & Vieira, E. T. (2012), Striving for legitimacy through corporate social responsibility: Insights from oil companies. Journal of Business Ethics (in press).

  • Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532–550.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elsbach, K. D. (1994). Managing organizational legitimacy in the California cattle industry: The construction and effectiveness of verbal accounts. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39(1), 57–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elsbach, K. D., & Sutton, R. I. (1992). Acquiring organizational legitimacy through illegitimate actions: A marriage of institutional and impression management theories. Academy of Management Journal, 35(4), 699–738.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emery, F. E., & Trist, E. L. (1965). The causal texture of organizational environments. Human Relations, 18(1), 21–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erkama, N., & Vaara, E. (2010). Struggles over legitimacy in global organizational restructuring: A rhetorical perspective on legitimation strategies and dynamics in a shutdown case. Organization Studies, 31(7), 813–839.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fam, K. S., Waller, D. S., & Erdogan, Z. (2004). The influence of religion on attitudes towards the advertising of controversial products. European Journal of Marketing, 38(5/6), 537–555.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foldy, E. G., Goldman, L., & Ospina, S. (2008). Sensegiving and the role of cognitive shifts in the work of leadership. Leadership Quarterly, 19(5), 514–529.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, E. R. (2007). Building an ethical America. Philadelphia, PA: Society for Business Ethics Annual Meeting.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, J. H., Carroll, G. R., & Hannan, M. T. (1983). The liability of newness: Age dependence in organizational death rates. American Sociological Review, 48(5), 692–710.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frynas, J. (2005). The false developmental promise of corporate social responsibility: Evidence from multinational oil companies. International Affairs, 81(3), 581–598.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galaskiewicz, J. (1985). Interorganizational relations. Annual Review of Sociology, 11, 281–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gioia, D., & Chittipeddi, K. (1991). Sensemaking and sensegiving in strategic change initiation. Strategic Management Journal, 12(6), 433–448.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hannan, M. T., & Carroll, G. R. (1992). Dynamics of organizational populations: Density, legitimation and competition. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heugens, P. P. M. R., & Landler, M. W. (2009). Structure! Agency! (and other quarrels): A meta-analysis of institutional theories of organization. Academy of Management Journal, 52(1), 61–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hongwei, H., & Baruch, Y. (2010). Organizational identity and legitimacy under major environmental changes: Tales of two UK building societies. British Journal of Management, 21(1), 44–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jepperson, R. L. (1991). Institutions, institutional effects, and institutionalism. In W. W. Powell & P. J. DiMaggio (Eds.), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis (pp. 143–163). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katsanis, L. P. (1994). Do unmentionable products still exist?: An empirical investigation. Journal of Product and Brand Management, 3(4), 5–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kindt, J. W. (2006). Testimony before the subcommittee on crime, terrorism, and homeland security. United States House of Representatives. Legislative Hearing on H.R 4777: The Internet Gambling Prohibition Act, April 5.

  • Kostova, T., & Zaheer, S. (1999). Organizational legitimacy under conditions of complexity: The case of the multinational enterprise. Academy of Management Review, 24(1), 64–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lounsbury, M., & Glynn, M. A. (2001). Cultural entrepreneurship: Stories, legitimacy, and the acquisition of resources. Strategic Management Journal, 22(6–7), 545–564.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCracken, G. (1986). The long interview. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, J., & Scott, W. R. (1983). Organizational environments: Ritual and rationality. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miles, M., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, R., & Michelson, G. (2012). Fixing the game? Legitimacy, morality policy and research in gambling. Journal of Business Ethics (in press).

  • Miller, W., & Schwartz, M. D. (1998). Casino gambling and street crime. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 556(1), 124–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milne, M. J., & Patten, D. M. (2002). Securing organizational legitimacy: An experimental decision case examining the impact of environmental disclosures. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 15(3), 372–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moerman, L., & Van Der Laan, S. (2005). Social reporting in the tobacco industry: All smoke and mirrors? Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 18(3), 374–389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oliver, C. (1991). Strategic responses to institutional processes. Academy of Management Review, 16(1), 145–179.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palazzo, G., & Richter, U. (2005). CSR business as usual? The case of the tobacco industry. Journal of Business Ethics, 61(4), 387–401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palazzo, G., & Scherer, A. G. (2006). Corporate legitimacy as deliberation: A communicative framework. Journal of Business Ethics, 66(1), 71–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patriotta, G., Gond, J. P., & Schultz, F. (2011). Maintaining legitimacy: Controversies, orders of worth and public justifications. Journal of Management Studies, 48(8), 1804–1836.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patton, M. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3d ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perrow, C. (1984). Normal accidents: Living with high-risk technologies. New York, NY: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pettigrew, A. M. (1985). Contextualist research and the study of organizational change processes. In E. E. Lawler Jr, et al. (Eds.), Doing research that is useful for theory and practice (pp. 222–248). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfeffer, J. (1981). Management as symbolic action: The creation and maintenance of organizational paradigms. In L. L. Cummings & B. M. Staw (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (pp. 1–52, Vol. 13). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

  • Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. R. (1978). The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective. New York, NY: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pizam, A., & Pokela, J. (1985). The perceived impacts of casino gambling on a community. Annals of Tourism Research, 12, 147–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reast, J., Lindgreen, A., Vanhamme, J., & Maon, F. (2010). The Manchester super casino: Experience and learning in a cross-sector social partnerships. Journal of Business Ethics, 94(Suppl. 1), 197–218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruef, M., & Scott, W. R. (1998). A multidimensional model of organizational legitimacy: Hospital survival in changing institutional environments. Administrative Science Quarterly, 43(4), 877–904.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rundle-Thiele, S., Ball, K., & Gillespie, M. (2008). Raising the bar: From corporate social responsibility to corporate social performance. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 25(4), 245–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rutherford, M. W., & Buller, P. F. (2007). Searching for the legitimacy threshold. Journal of Management Inquiry, 16(1), 78–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sethi, S. P. (1975). Dimensions of corporate social performance: An analytical framework. California Management Review, 17(3), 58–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spiggle, S. (1994). Analysis and interpretation of qualitative data in consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research, 21(3), 491–503.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suchman, M. C. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 571–610.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suddaby, R., & Greenwood, R. (2005). Rhetorical strategies of legitimacy. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50(1), 35–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tost, L. P. (2011). An integrative model of legitimacy judgments. Academy of Management Review, 36(4), 686–710.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyler, T. R., & Blader, S. L. (2005). Can businesses effectively regulate employee conduct? The antecedents of rule following in work settings. Academy of Management Journal, 48(6), 1143–1158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vaara, E., Tienari, J., & Laurila, J. (2006). Pulp and paper fiction: On the discursive legitimation of global industrial restructuring. Organization Studies, 27(6), 798–810.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waller, D. S., Fam, K. S., & Erdogan, B. Z. (2005). Advertising of controversial products: A cross-cultural study. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 22(1), 6–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wansell, G. (2007). The vulgar tycoon who loves, boxing, blondes … and buying influence. January: Daily Mail. 30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weigelt, K., & Camerer, C. (1988). Reputation and corporate strategy: A review of recent theory and applications. Strategic Management Journal, 9, 443–454.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Werther, W. B., & Chandler, D. (2005). Strategic corporate social responsibility as a global brand insurance. Business Horizons, 48(4), 317–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, A., & West, C. (1981). The marketing of ‘unmentionables’. Harvard Business Review, 51(1), 91–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodward, D. G., Edwards, P., & Birkin, F. (1996). Organizational legitimacy and stakeholder information provision. British Journal of Management, 7, 329–347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yin, R. (2003). Case study research (3d ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yoon, Y., Gurhan-Canli, Z., & Schwartz, N. (2006). The effect of CSR activities on companies with bad reputations. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 16(4), 377–390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, M., & Zeitz, G. (2002). Beyond survival: Achieving new venture growth by building legitimacy. Academy of Management Review, 2(3), 414–431.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zucker, L. G. (1987). Institutional theories of organizations. Annual Review of Sociology, 13, 443–644.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Alex Michalos served as editor for this article.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Adam Lindgreen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Reast, J., Maon, F., Lindgreen, A. et al. Legitimacy-Seeking Organizational Strategies in Controversial Industries: A Case Study Analysis and a Bidimensional Model. J Bus Ethics 118, 139–153 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1571-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1571-4

Keywords

Navigation