Skip to main content
Log in

The rise and (surprisingly rapid) fall of psycholinguistics

  • Published:
Synthese Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Psycholinguistics re-emerged in an almost explosive fashion during the 1950s and 1960s. It then underwent an equally abrupt decline as an independent sub-discipline. This paper charts this fall and identifies five general factors which, it is argued, were responsible for its demise. These are: (a) an uncompromisingly strong version of nativism; (b) a growing isolation of psycholinguistics from the body psychology; (c) a preference for formal theory over empirical data; (d) several abrupt modifications in the “Standard Theory” in linguistics; and (e) a failure to appreciate the strong commitment to functionalism that characterizes experimental psychology. In short, what looked like a revolution two decades ago turned out to be merely a local reformation that occurred along side of and largely independent from the real revolution in the cognitive sciences.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Blumenthal, A. L.: 1970, Language and Psychology, Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, R.: 1958, Words and Things, The Free Press, Glencoe, Illinois.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, N.: 1957, Syntactic Structures, Mouton, The Hague.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, N.: 1965, Aspects of a Theory of Syntax, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fodor, J. A., T. G. Bever and M. F. Garrett: 1974, The Psychology of Language, McGraw-Hill, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lashley, K. S.: 1951, ‘The Problem of Serial Order in Behavior’, in L. A. Jeffress (ed.), Cerebral Mechanisms in Behavior, Wiley, New York, pp. 112–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, E. and K. H. Roberts: 1966, ‘Grammatical Factors in Sentence Retention’, Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 5, 211–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mehler, J.: 1980, ‘Psychology and Psycholinguistics: The Impact of Chomsky and Piaget’, in M. Piattelli-Palmarini (ed.), Language and Learning: The Debate between Piaget and Chomsky, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, pp. 341–353.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, G. A.: 1951a, Language and Communication, McGraw-Hill, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, G. A.: 1951b, ‘Speech and Language’, in S. S. Stevens (ed.), Handbook of Experimental Psychology, Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, G. A. and J. A. Selfridge: 1950, ‘Verbal Context and the Recall of Meaningful Material’, American Journal of Psychology 63, 176–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piattelli-Palmarini, M. (ed.): 1980, Language and Learning: The Debate between Piaget and Chomsky, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reber, A. S.: 1973, ‘On Psycho-linguistic Paradigms’, Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 2, 289–319.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robins, R. H.: 1967, A Short History of Linguistics, Indiana University Press, Bloomington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shannon, C. E. and W. Weaver: 1949, The Mathematical Theory of Communication, University of Illinois Press, Urbana.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Reber, A.S. The rise and (surprisingly rapid) fall of psycholinguistics. Synthese 72, 325–339 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00413750

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00413750

Keywords

Navigation