Abstract
In a recent paper (Linguistics and Philosophy 23, 4, June 2000), Jason Stanley argues that there are no `unarticulated constituents', contrary to what advocates of Truth-conditional pragmatics (TCP) have claimed. All truth-conditional effects of context can be traced to logical form, he says. In this paper I maintain that there are unarticulated constituents, and I defend TCP. Stanley's argument exploits the fact that the alleged unarticulated constituents can be `bound', that is, they can be made to vary with the values introduced by operators in the sentence. I show that Stanley's argument rests on a fallacy, and I provide alternative analyses of the data.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Bach, K.: 1994a, 'Semantic Slack: What is Said and More', in S. Tsohatzidis (ed.), Foundations of Speech Act Theory, Routledge, London, pp. 267-91.
Bach, K.: 1994b, 'Conversational Impliciture', Mind and Language 9, 124-162.
Barwise, J.: 1989, The Situation in Logic, CSLI Publications, Stanford.
Carston, R.: 1988, 'Implicature, Explicature, and Truth-Theoretic Semantics', in R. Kempson (ed.), Mental Representations: The Interface between Language and Reality, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 155-181.
Carston, R.: forthcoming, 'Explicature and Semantics', to appear in S. Davis and B. Gillon (eds.), Semantics: A Reader, Oxford University Press, New York.
Chalmers, D.: 1996, The Conscious Mind, Oxford University Press, New York.
Chomsky, N.: 1976, 'Conditions on Rules of Grammar', Linguistic Analysis 2, 303-351.
Chomsky, N.: 1986, 'Changing Perspectives on Knowledge and Use of Language', in M. Brand and M. Harnish (eds.), The Representation of Knowledge and Belief, The University of Arizona Press, Tucson, pp. 1-58.
Clark, H. and S. Haviland: 1974, 'Psychological Processes as Linguistic Explanation', in D. Cohen (ed.), Explaining Linguistic Phenomena, Hemisphere Publication Corporation, Washington.
Clark, H. and S. Haviland: 1977, 'Comprehension and the Given-New Contract', in R. Freedle (ed.), Discourse Production and Comprehension, Ablex, Norwood New Jersey.
Cresswell, M.: 1996, Semantic Indexicality, Kluwer Academic Publisher, Dordrecht.
Crimmins, M.: 1992, Talk About Belief, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Fillmore, C.: 1986, 'Pragmatically Controlled Zero Anaphora', BLS 12, 95-107.
Heal, J.: 1997, 'Indexical Predicates and Their Uses', Mind 106, 619-640.
Higginbotham, J.: 1985, 'On Semantics', Linguistic Inquiry 16, 547-593.
Jacobson, P.: 1999, 'Towards a Variable-Free Semantics', Linguistics and Philosophy 22, 117-184.
Kaplan, D.: 1989, 'Demonstratives', in J. Almog, J. Perry and H. Wettstein (eds.), Themes from Kaplan, Oxford University Press, New York, pp. 481-563.
Larson, R. and G. Segal: 1995, Knowledge of Meaning, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
Levin, B.: 1993, English Verb Classes and Alternations, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
McConnell-Ginet, S.: 1982, 'Adverbs and Logical Form', Language 58, 144-184.
Mitchell, J.: 1986, The Formal Semantics of Point of View, Ph.D. dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
Nunberg, G.: 1992, 'Two Kinds of Indexicality', in C. Barker and D. Dowty (eds.), Proceedings of SALT II, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, pp. 283-301.
Partee, B.: 1989, 'Binding Implicit Variables in Quantified Contexts', CLS 25, 342-365.
Perry, J.: 1993, The Problem of the Essential Indexical and Other Essays, Oxford University Press, New York.
Perry, J.: 1998, 'Indexicals, Contexts, and Unarticulated Constituents', in D. Westertahl et al. (eds.), Computing Natural Language, CSLI Publications, Stanford, pp. 1-11.
Quine, W. V. O.: 1960, 'Variables Explained Away', in his Selected Logic Papers, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1995, pp. 227-235.
Recanati, F.: 1993, Direct Reference: from Language to Thought, Blackwell, Oxford.
Recanati, F.: 1995, 'The Alleged Priority of Literal Interpretation', Cognitive Science 19, 207-232.
Recanati, F.: 1999, 'Situations and the Structure of Content', in K. Murasugi and R. Stainton (eds.), Philosophy and Linguistics,Westview, Boulder, Colorado, pp. 113-165.
Recanati, F.: 2001, 'What Is Said', Synthese 128, 75-91.
Recanati, F.: forthcoming, 'Truth-Conditional Pragmatics: An Overview', in P. Bouquet and L. Serafini (eds.), Context, CSLI Publications, Stanford.
Rumelhart, D.: 1979, 'Some Problems with the Notion of Literal Meanings', in A.Ortony (ed.), Metaphor and Thought, 2nd ed., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1993, pp. 71-82.
Searle, J.: 1992, The Rediscovery of the Mind, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
Sperber D. and D. Wilson: 1986, Relevance: Communication and Cognition, Basil Blackwell, Oxford.
Stalnaker, R.: 1999, Context and Content, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Stanley, J.: 2000, 'Context and Logical Form', Linguistics and Philosophy 23, 391-434.
Stanley, J.: forthcoming, 'Making It Articulated', to appear in Mind and Language.
Stanley, J. and Z. Szabo: 2000, 'On Quantifier Domain Restriction', Mind and Language 15, 219-261.
Taylor, K.: 2001, 'Sex, Breakfast, and Descriptus Interruptus', Synthese 128, 45-61.
Tesniè re, L.: 1969, Eléments de Syntaxe Structurale, 2nd ed., Klincksieck, Paris.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Recanati, F. Unarticulated Constituents. Linguistics and Philosophy 25, 299–345 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015267930510
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015267930510