Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-fqc5m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-27T19:12:12.510Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Stakeholder Management Theory: A Critical Theory Perspective

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 January 2015

Abstract:

This article elaborates a normative Stakeholder Management Theory (SHMT) from a critical theory perspective. The paper argues that the normative theory elaborated by critical theorists such as Habermas exhibits important advantages over its rivals and that these advantages provide the basis for a theoretically more adequate version of SHMT. In the first section of the paper an account is given of normative theory from a critical theory perspective and its advantages over rival traditions. A key characteristic of the critical theory approach is expressed as a distinction between three different normative realms, viz., legitimacy, morality, and ethics. In the second section, the outlines of a theory of stakeholder management are provided. First, three basic tasks of a theoretically adequate treatment of the normative analysis of stakeholder management are identified. This is followed by a discussion of how a critical theory approach to SHMT is able to fulfill these three tasks.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Business Ethics 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Apel, Karl-Otto. 1981. Charles S. Peirce. From Pragmatism to Pragaticism, trans. Mihail Krois, John.Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press.Google Scholar
Benhabib, Sheila. 1986. Critique, Norm and Utopia. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Brummer, James J. 1991. Corporate Responsibility and Legitimacy: An Interdisciplinary Analysis. New York: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
Dachler, H. Peter and Enderle, Georges. 1989. Epistemological and Ethical Considerations in Conceptualizing and Implementing Human Resource Management. Journal of Business Ethics 8, no. 8: 597606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donaldson, Thomas and Preston, Lee E. 1995. The Stakeholder Theory of the Corporation: Concepts, Evidence, and Implications. Academy of Management Review 20, no. 1: 6591.Google Scholar
Freeman, R. Edward. 1984. Strategic Management. Boston: Pitman Books.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen. 1984. The Theory of Communicative Action. trans. McCarthy, Thomas.Boston: Beacon Hill.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen. 1987. Philosophy as Stand-in and Interpreter. In After Philosophy, ed. Baynes, Kenneth et al. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen. 1990. Moral Consciousness and Communicative Action. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen. 1993. Justification and Application: Remarks on Discourse Ethics, trans. Cronin, Ciaran P.Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen. 1996. Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy, trans. Rehg, William.Cambridge: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacIntyre, Alisdair. 1981. After Virtue. Dame, Notre, Ind.: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
MacIntyre, Alisdair. 1988. Whose Justice? Which Rationality? Dame, Notre, Ind.: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
Miles, Grant. 1993. In Search of Ethical Profits: Insights from Strategic Management. Journal of Business Ethics 12, no. 1: 219225.Google Scholar
Rawls, John. 1971. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Solomon, Robert C. 1993. Ethics and Excellence: Cooperation and Integrity in Business. Engelwood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar