Abstract
Although there are different approaches to sustainability auditing, those considered authoritative use scientific indicators and instruments to measure and predict the impact of organizational operations on socio-ecological systems. Such approaches are biased because they can only measure phenomena whose features lend themselves to quantification, control, and observation directly with the instruments produced by technology. This technocratic bias is a product of the mechanistic worldview, which presumes that all components of socio-ecological systems are identifiable, discrete, and material. In contrast to the mechanistic worldview, indigenous people use animist familial representations. In the case of New Zealand Māori a family tree (whakapapa) is used to represent socio-ecological systems. This is a flexible conception, which views socio-ecological systems as both composites made up of interlinking causally-connected parts but also as reciprocating systems that have intangible elements such as consciousness, emotion, and agency. The technocratic approach is ontologically incapable of incorporating intangible elements to such a degree we consider that it incompatible with animist approaches. It is not, however, epistemologically-incongruous for indigenous peoples because of the flexible hybridity of their worldview. This worldview provides a broad moral framework, which avoids discrediting subjectivity and reducing socio-ecological systems to only their instrumental value. Finally, we conclude that the indigenous approach has much to offer the field of sustainability auditing, given that it provides a moral framework, and insight into building assessment systems upon abductive reasoning.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Morgan’s mauri-ometer can be found here: http://www.mauriometer.com/WebPage/Show/2.
Abbreviations
- GPS:
-
Global positioning system
- ICT:
-
Information and communication technologies
- NTHC:
-
Ngāi Tahu Holdings Corporation
- TSA:
-
Technocratic sustainability auditing
References
Abram, D. 1991. The mechanical and the organic: On the impact of metaphor in science. In Scientists on Gaia, ed. S.H. Schneider and P.J. Boston, 66–74. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Alrøe, H.F., and E. Noe. 2016. Sustainability assessment and complementarity. Ecology and Society 21 (1): 30.
Azar, C., J. Holmberg, and K. Lindgren. 1996. Socio-ecological indicators for sustainability. Ecological Economics 18 (2): 89–112.
Bell, S., and S. Morse. 2008. Sustainability indicators: Measuring the immeasurable? London: Earthscan.
Browder, J.O. 1995. Redemptive communities: Indigenous knowledge, colonist farming systems, and conservation of tropical forests. Agriculture and Human Values 12 (1): 17–30.
Busch, L. 2011. Standards: Recipes for reality. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Busch, L. 2014. Governance in the age of global markets: Challenges, limits, and consequences. Agriculture and Human Values 31 (3): 513–523.
Campbell, H. 2005. The rise and rise of EurepGAP: European (re)invention of colonial food relations? International Journal of Sociology of Agriculture and Food 13 (2): 1–19.
Campbell, H., A. Murcott, and A. MacKenzie. 2011. Kosher in New York City, halal in Aquitaine: Challenging the relationship between neoliberalism and food auditing. Agriculture and Human Values 28 (1): 67–79.
Cook, W., S. van Bommel, and E. Turnhout. 2016. Inside environmental auditing: Effectiveness, objectivity, and transparency. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 18: 33–39.
Davies, P., and J. Gribbin. 1992. The matter myth: Dramatic discoveries that challenge our understanding of physical reality. New York: Simon & Schuster.
Davis-Floyd, R., and G. St. John. 1998. From doctor to healer: The transformative journey. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.
Davison, A. 2001. Technology and the contested meanings of sustainability. New York: SUNY Press.
Drengson, A.R. 1995. Shifting paradigms: From the technocratic to the person-planetary. In The deep ecology movement: An introductory anthology, eds. A.R. Drengson, and Y. Inoue, 74–100. Berkeley, CA: North Atlantic Books.
Dyson, L.E. 2004. Cultural issues in the adoption of information and communication technologies by Indigenous Australians. In Proceedings cultural attitudes towards communication and technology, eds. F. Sudweeks and C. Ess, 58–71. Perth, Australia: Murdoch University.
Eckerberg, K., and E. Mineur. 2003. The use of local sustainability indicators: Case studies in two Swedish municipalities. Local Environment 8 (6): 591–614.
Eernstman, N., and A. Wals. 2009. Jhum meets IFOAM: Introducing organic agriculture in a tribal society. International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability 7 (2): 95–106.
Ess, C. 2005. Being in place out of place/Being out of place in place. In Technology in a multicultural and global society, eds. C. Ess, and M. Thorseth, 91–114. Programme for Applied Ethics: Publications Series No. 6. Norwegian University of Science and Technology.
Fraser, E.D.G., A.J. Dougill, W.E. Mabee, M. Reed, and P. McAlpine. 2006. Bottom up and top down: Analysis of participatory processes for sustainability indicator identification as a pathway to community empowerment and sustainable environmental management. Journal of Environmental Management 78 (2): 114–127.
Friedberg, S. 2004. French beans and food scares: Culture and commerce in an anxious age. New York: Oxford University Press.
Gosling, E., and K.J.H. Williams. 2008. Connectedness to nature, place attachment and conservation behaviour: Testing connectedness theory among farmers. Journal of Environmental Psychology 30 (3): 298–304.
Hatanaka, M., and L. Busch. 2008. Third-party certification in the global agrifood system: An objective or socially mediated governance mechanism? Sociologia Ruralis 48 (1): 73–91.
Horst, S. 2007. Beyond reduction: Philosophy of mind and post-reductionist philosophy of science. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hudson, M., K. Russell, L. Uerata, M. Milne, P. Wilcox, R. Port, B. Smith, V. Toki, and A. Beaton. 2016. Te Mata Ira—Faces of the gene: Developing a cultural foundation for biobanking and genomic research involving Maori. AlterNative 12 (4): 341–355.
Kitson, J.C., and H. Moller. 2008. Looking after your ground: Resource management practice by Rakiura Maori titi harvesters. Papers and Proceedings of the Royal Society of Tasmania 142 (1): 161–176.
Knapp, C.N., and M.E. Fernandez-Gimenez. 2009. Knowledge in practice: Documenting rancher local knowledge in Northwest Colorado. Rangeland Ecology & Management 62 (6): 500–509.
Küpers, W. 2005. Phenomenology of embodied implicit and narrative knowing. Journal of Knowledge Management 9 (6): 114–133.
Lane, M.B., and T. Corbett. 2005. The tyranny of localism: Indigenous participation in community-based environmental management. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning 7 (2): 141–159.
Latour, B. 1991. Nous n’avons jamais été modernes—Essai d’anthropologie symétrique. Paris, La Découverte. English edition: Latour, B. 1993. We have never been modern (trans C. Porter). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Lauer, M., and S. Aswani. 2009. Indigenous ecological knowledge as situated practices: Understanding fishers’ knowledge in the western Solomon Islands. American Anthropologist 111 (3): 317–329.
Lincoln, N.K., and N.M. Ardoin. 2016. Cultivating values: Environmental values and sense of place as correlates of sustainable agricultural practices. Agriculture and Human Values 33 (2): 389–401.
Marsden, T. 2006. The road towards sustainable rural development: Issues of theory, policy and practice in a European context. In Handbook of rural studies, eds. P. Cloke, T. Marsden, and P.H. Mooney, 201–213. London: Sage Publications.
Morris, C., and M. Reed. 2007. From burgers to biodiversity? The McDonaldization of on-farm nature conservation in the UK. Agriculture and Human Values 24 (2): 207–218.
Morse, S., N. McNamara, M. Acholo, and B. Okwoli. 2001. Sustainability indicators: The problem of integration. Sustainable Development 9 (1): 1–15.
Neilson, J., and B. Pritchard. 2007. Green coffee? The contradictions of global sustainability initiatives from an Indian perspective. Development Policy Review 25 (3): 311–331.
Parker, J. 2014. Critiquing sustainability, changing philosophy. London: Routledge.
Petrie, H. 2006. Chiefs of industry: Maori tribal enterprise in early colonial New Zealand. Auckland: Auckland University Press.
Polanyi, M., and M. Grene. 1969. Knowing and being: Essays by Michael Polanyi. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Power, M. 1997. The audit society: Rituals of verification. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Reid, J., and M. Rout. 2016. Getting to know your food: The insights of indigenous thinking in food provenance. Agriculture and Human Values 33 (2): 427–438.
Riskin, J. 2015. The restless clock: A history of the centuries-long argument over what makes living things tick. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Roncoli, C., K. Ingram, P. Kirshen, and C. Jost. 2001. Burkina Faso: Integrating indigenous and scientific rainfall forecasting. IKnotes 39: 1–4.
Sternberg, R. 2001. Why schools should teach for wisdom: The balance theory of wisdom in educational settings. Educational Psychologist 36 (4): 227–245.
Strathern, M. 2000. Introduction. In Audit cultures: Anthropological studies in accountability, ethics, and the academy, ed. M. Strathern, 1–18. London: Routledge.
Taylor, C. 1991. The malaise of modernity. Concord: Anansi.
Te Rūnanga o Kaikōura. 2007 Te Poha o Tohu Raumati. Kaikōura: Te Rūnanga o Kaikōura.
Wheeler, W. 2010. Gregory Bateson and biosemiotics: Transcendence and animism in the 21st Century. Green Letters: Studies in Ecocriticism 13 (1): 35–54.
Willerslev, R. 2007. Soul hunters: Hunting, animism, and personhood among the Siberian Yukaghirs. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Williams, G.R. 1996. The molecular biology of Gaia. New York: Columbia University Press.
Wilson, E.O. 1984. Biophilia. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Woodley, E. 1991. Indigenous ecological knowledge systems and development. Agriculture and Human Values 8 (1–2): 173–178.
Acknowledgements
This study was funded by the New Zealand Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment (Contract Number AGRB1201).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Reid, J., Rout, M. Can sustainability auditing be indigenized?. Agric Hum Values 35, 283–294 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-017-9821-9
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-017-9821-9