Ahmed, F. et al., “Effect of Influenza Vaccination of Health-care Personnel on Morbidity and Mortality Among Patients: Systematic Review and Grading of Evidence,” Clinical Infectious Diseases 58, no. 1 (2014): 50-57; Amodio, E. et al., “Can Influenza Vaccination Coverage Among Healthcare Workers Influence the Risk of Nosocomial Influenza-Like Illness in Hospitalized Patients?” Journal of Hospital Infection 86, no. 14 (2014): 182-187.Google Scholar

For treatment of this issue, see: Randall, L.H., Curran, E.A., and Omer, S.B., “Legal Considerations Surrounding Mandatory Influenza Vaccination for Healthcare Workers in the United States,” Vaccine 31 (2013): 1771-1776; Field, R.I., “Mandatory Vaccination of Healthcare Workers: Whose Rights Should Come First?” Pharmacy and Therapeutics 34, no. 11 (2009): 615-618; Najera, R.F. and Reiss, D.R., “First Do No Harm: Protecting Patients Through Immunizing Health Care Workers,” Health Matrix 26, no. 1 (2016): 363-402.Google Scholar

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, “Immunization of Health-Care Personnel: Recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices,” (ACIP) Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report 60, no. 7 (RR07) (2011).Google Scholar

Wang, T.L., Jing, L., and Bocchini, J.A. Jr., “Mandatory Influenza Vaccination for All Healthcare Personnel: A Review on Justification, Implementation and Effectiveness,” Current Opinion in Pediatrics 29, no. 5 (2017): 606-615.Google Scholar

Black, C.L. et al., “Influenza Vaccination Coverage Among Health Care Personnel — United States, 2015–16 Influenza Season,” Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report 65, no. 38 (2016):1026-1031.Google Scholar

See Field, supra note 2.Google Scholar

Wang et al., supra note 4, at 609.Google Scholar

Immunization Action Coalition, Influenza Vaccination Honor Roll, available at <http://www.immunize.org/honor-roll/influenza-mandates> (last visited July 20, 2018).+(last+visited+July+20,+2018).>Google Scholar

Ottenberg, A.L. et al., “Vaccinating Health Care Workers Against Influenza: The Ethical and Legal Rationale for a Mandate,” American Journal of Public Health 101, no. 2 (2011): 212-216; Caplan, A.L., “Time to Mandate Influenza Vaccination in Health-Care Workers,” The Lancet 378, no. 9788 (2011): 310-311; Feemster, K.A. et al., “Employee Designation and Health Care Worker Support of an Influenza Vaccine Mandate at a Large Pediatric Tertiary Care Hospital,” Vaccine 29, no. 9 (2011): 1762-1769.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

See Emp't Div. v. Smith, 494 U.S. 872, 888-90 (1990); see also Burwell v. Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc., 134 S.Ct. 2751, 2760-62 (2014).Google Scholar

Calandrillo, S.P., “Vanishing Vaccinations: Why Are So Many Americans Opting Out of Vaccinating Their Children?” University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform 37, no. 2 (2004): 353-440; Reiss, D.R., “Thou Shalt Not Take the Name of the Lord Thy God in Vain: Use and Abuse of Religious Exemptions from School Immunization Requirements,” Hastings Law Journal 65, no. 6 (2014): 1551-1602.Google Scholar

Trans World Airlines, Inc. v. Hardison, 432 U.S. 63 (1977).Google Scholar

Wang, supra note 4, at 607-608.Google Scholar

See Najera and Reiss, supra note 2.Google Scholar

29 C.F.R. § 1605.1 (2018).Google Scholar

Chenzira v. Cincinnati Children's Hosp. Med. Ctr., No. 1:11-CV-00917, 2012 WL 6721098, at *4 (S.D. Ohio Dec. 27, 2012). See Opel, D.J., Sonne, J.A., and Mello, M.M., “Vaccination without Litigation — Addressing Religious Objections to Hospital Influenza-Vaccination Mandates,” N. Engl. J. Med. 378 (2018): 785-788.Google Scholar

United States v. Seeger, 380 U.S. 163, 185 (1965).Google Scholar

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Directives Transmittal No. 915.003: EEOC Compliance Manual (Jul. 22, 2008), available at <https://www.eeoc.gov/policy/docs/religion.html#_Toc203359488> (last visited July 20, 2018).+(last+visited+July+20,+2018).>Google Scholar

Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. Nat. Res. Def. Council, Inc., 461 U.S. 837, 865 (1983).Google Scholar

U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Pandemic Preparedness in the Workplace and the Americans with Disabilities Act, available at <https://www.eeoc.gov/facts/pandemic_flu.html> (last visited July 20, 2018).+(last+visited+July+20,+2018).>Google Scholar

Id., § III(B), question 13.Google Scholar

Wang, supra note 4, at 607-608.Google Scholar

Inazu, J.D., “The Four Freedoms and the Future of Religious Liberty,” North Carolina Law Review 92, no. 3 (2014): 787-853, especially 797-804.Google Scholar

See Caplan and Ottenberg et al., supra note 9.Google Scholar

For an analysis, see Nathanson, D., “Herd Protection v. Vaccine Abstention, Potential Conflict Between School Vaccine Requirements and State Religious Freedom Restoration Acts,” American Journal of Law & Medicine 42, no. 2 & 3 (2016): 621-641.Google Scholar

Opel, Sonne, and Mello, supra note 16, appear to hold that view.Google Scholar

EEOC v. Saint Vincent Health Ctr., No. 16-CV-00234, 2016 WL 7438696 (W.D. Pa. Dec. 23, 2016) (settled); EEOC v. Mission Hosp., No. 16-CV-00118, 2016 WL 1697385 (W.D. N.C. Apr. 28, 2016) (settled); EEOC v. Baystate Med. Ctr., No. 16-CV-030086, 2016 WL 3098271 (D. Mass. June 2, 2016) (still open).Google Scholar

Opel, Sonne, and Mello, supra note 16, provide an overview of a larger number of cases, going back further in time. Their conclusions are not in tension with ours, though they do not seem to support not providing a religious exemption.Google Scholar

EEOC v. Memorial Healthcare, No. 2:18-cv-10523 (E.D. Mich. filed Feb. 13, 2018) (brought by the EEOC) [hereinafter Memorial]; United States v. Ozakee Cty., No. 2:18-cv-00343-DEJ (E.D. Wisc. filed Mar. 6, 2018). Both cases are ongoing.Google Scholar

Robinson v. Children's Hosp. Bos., No. 14-10263-DJC Civ., 2016 WL 1337255 (D. Mass. Apr. 5, 2016).Google Scholar

Seeger, 380 U.S. at 185; see also Bushouse v. Local Union 2209, UAW, 164 F. Supp. 2d 1066 (N.D. Ind. 2001).Google Scholar

EEOC v. Saint Vincent Health Ctr., No. 16-CV-00234, 2016 WL 7438696 (W.D. Pa. Dec. 23, 2016).Google Scholar

Ozakee Cty., No. 2:18-cv-00343-DE.Google Scholar

Dalli v. Bd. of Educ., 358 Mass. 753, 267 N.E.2d 219 (1971). See also Reiss, supra note 11.Google Scholar

Opel, Sonne, and Mello, supra note 16.Google Scholar

Saint Vincent Health Ctr., 2016 WL 7438696.Google Scholar

Berg v. Glen Cove City Sch. Dist., 853 F. Supp. 651 (E.D.N.Y. 1994).Google Scholar

Health care institutions choosing that route may want to be on the lookout for internet sites offering pre-prepared documents to submit for the purpose, the use of which may suggest lack of sincerity.Google Scholar

877 F.3d 487, 490-491 (3d Cir. 2017).Google Scholar

662 F.2d 1025, 1032 (3d. Cir. 1981).Google Scholar

Id.Google Scholar

Fallon, 877 F.3d at 490-491.Google Scholar

EEOC v. Mission Hosp., No. 16-CV-00118, 2018 WL 401505 (W.D. N.C. Jan. 12, 2018).Google Scholar

Opel, Sonne, and Mellow, supra note 16.Google Scholar

See Memorial, supra note 19.Google Scholar

Najera and Reiss, supra note 2, at 391-394.Google Scholar

On January 18, 2018 the Department of Health and Human Services announced the creation of a New Conscience and Religious Freedom Division in its Office of Civil Rights (available at <https://www.hhs.gov/about/news/2018/01/18/hhs-ocr-announces-new-conscience-and-religious-freedom-division.html> (last visited July 20, 2018); see also Glasser, N.M. and Smith, K., “A Shot in the Arm for Employer Vaccine Requirements for Health Care Workers,” National Law Review, January 29, 2018. The Division's first proposed rulemaking makes it clear that its goal is to tighten protections for workers seeking religious accommodation (Protecting Statutory Conscience Rights in Health Care; Delegations of Authority, 83 Fed. Reg. 3880 (proposed Jan. 26, 2018) (to be codified at 45 C.F.R. pt. 88), available at <https://s3.amazonaws.com/public-inspection.federalregister.gov/2018-01226.pdf> (last visited July 20, 2018)). It is too early to know what, exactly, the department would do, and whether it would affect the situation in relation to influenza mandates. We live this for future examination, both because this is outside the scope of the paper and because it is not yet clear whether it would affect the legal situation, and in which ways. (last visited July 20, 2018)). It is too early to know what, exactly, the department would do, and whether it would affect the situation in relation to influenza mandates. We live this for future examination, both because this is outside the scope of the paper and because it is not yet clear whether it would affect the legal situation, and in which ways.' href=https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=On+January+18,+2018+the+Department+of+Health+and+Human+Services+announced+the+creation+of+a+New+Conscience+and+Religious+Freedom+Division+in+its+Office+of+Civil+Rights+(available+at++(last+visited+July+20,+2018);+see+also+Glasser,+N.M.+and+Smith,+K.,+“A+Shot+in+the+Arm+for+Employer+Vaccine+Requirements+for+Health+Care+Workers,”+National+Law+Review,+January+29,+2018.+The+Division's+first+proposed+rulemaking+makes+it+clear+that+its+goal+is+to+tighten+protections+for+workers+seeking+religious+accommodation+(Protecting+Statutory+Conscience+Rights+in+Health+Care;+Delegations+of+Authority,+83+Fed.+Reg.+3880+(proposed+Jan.+26,+2018)+(to+be+codified+at+45+C.F.R.+pt.+88),+available+at++(last+visited+July+20,+2018)).+It+is+too+early+to+know+what,+exactly,+the+department+would+do,+and+whether+it+would+affect+the+situation+in+relation+to+influenza+mandates.+We+live+this+for+future+examination,+both+because+this+is+outside+the+scope+of+the+paper+and+because+it+is+not+yet+clear+whether+it+would+affect+the+legal+situation,+and+in+which+ways.>Google Scholar