Abstract
The notion of ecological rationality implies that the accuracy of a decision strategy depends on features of the information environment in which it is tested. We demonstrate that the performance of a group may be strongly affected by the decision strategies used by its individual members and specify how this effect is moderated by environmental features. Specifically, in a set of simulation studies, we systematically compared four decision strategies used by the individual group members: two linear, compensatory decision strategies and two simple, noncompensatory heuristics. Individual decisions were aggregated by using a majority rule. To assess the ecological rationality of the strategies, we varied (a) the distribution of cue validities, (b) the quantity, and (c) the quality of shared information. Group performance strongly depended on the distribution of cue validities. When validities were linearly distributed, groups using a compensatory strategy achieved the highest accuracy. Conversely, when cue validities followed a J-shaped distribution, groups using a simple lexicographic heuristic performed best. While these effects were robust across different quantities of shared information, the quality of shared information exerted stronger effects on group performance. Consequences for prescriptive theories on group decision making are discussed
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adamowicz W. A., Hanemann M., Swait, J., Johnson, R., Layton, D., Regenwetter, M., Reimer, T. and Sorkin, R. (in press), Group decisions: Analyzing decision strategy and structure in households, Marketing Letters
R.S. Baron N.L. Kerr N. Miller (1992) Group Process, Group Decision, Group Action Open University Press Buckingham
A. Bröder (2000) ArticleTitleAssessing the empirical validity of the ‘Take The Best’ heuristic as a model of human probabilistic inference Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 26 1332–1346 Occurrence Handle10.1037/0278-7393.26.5.1332
Czerlinki J., Gigerenzer G. and Goldstein D.G. (1999), How good are simple heuristics?. In: Gigerenzer G., Todd P.M. and the ABC Research Group, Simple Heuristics that Make us Smart, Oxford University Press, New York, (pp. 97–118).
J.H. Davis (1973) ArticleTitleGroup decision and social interaction: A theory of social decision schemes Psychological Review 80 97–125
J.H. Davis (1992) ArticleTitleSome compelling intuitions about group consensus decisions, theoretical and empirical research, and interpersonal aggregation phenomena: selected examples, 1950–1990 Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 52 3–38 Occurrence Handle10.1016/0749-5978(92)90044-8
R.M. Dawes (1979) ArticleTitleThe robust beauty of improper linear models in decision making American Psychologist 34 571–582 Occurrence Handle10.1037//0003-066X.34.7.571
R.M. Dawes B. Corrigan (1974) ArticleTitleLinear models in decision making American Psychologist 34 571–582
H.J. Einhorn R.M. Hogarth E. Klempner (1977) ArticleTitleQuality of group judgment Psychological Bulletin 84 158–172 Occurrence Handle10.1037//0033-2909.84.1.158
G. Gigerenzer (2005) Fast and frugal heuristics: The tools of bounded rationality D. Koehler N. Harvey (Eds) Handbook of Judgment and Decision Making Blackwell Oxford, UK 62–88
G. Gigerenzer U. Hoffrage H. Kleinbölting (1991) ArticleTitleProbabilistic mental models; A Brunswikian theory of confidence Psychological Review 98 506–528 Occurrence Handle10.1037/0033-295X.98.4.506
G. Gigerenzer R. Selten (2001) Bounded Rationality: The Adaptive Toolbox MIT Press Cambridge, MA
G. Gigerenzer P.M. Todd InstitutionalAuthorNameThe ABC Research Group (1999) Simple Heuristics that Make us Smart Oxford University Press New York
D. Gigone R. Hastie (1996) The impact of information on group judgment: A model and computer simulation E.H. Witte J.H. Davis (Eds) Understanding Group Behavior: Consensual Action by Small Group NumberInSeriesVol 1 Erlbaum Associates Mahwah, NJ 221–251
D. Gigone R. Hastie (1997) ArticleTitleThe impact of information on small group choice Journal of Personality and Social Phychology 72 132–140 Occurrence Handle10.1037/0022-3514.72.1.132
R. Hastie T. Kameda (2005) ArticleTitleThe robust beauty of majority rules in group decisions Psychological Review 112 494–508 Occurrence Handle10.1037/0033-295X.112.2.494
Hertwig, R. Hoffrage, U. and Martignon, L. (1999), Quick estimation: Letting the environment do the work, in G. Gigerenzer, P. M. Todd and The ABC Research Group, Simple Heuristics that Make us Smart, Oxford University Press, New York, (pp. 209–234).
V.B. Hinsz R.S. Tindale D.A Vollrath (1997) ArticleTitleThe emerging conceptualization of groups as information processors Psychological Bulletin 121 43–64 Occurrence Handle10.1037/0033-2909.121.1.43
U. Hoffrage T. Reimer (2004) ArticleTitleModels of bounded rationality: The approach of fast and frugal heuristics Management Revue 15 IssueID4 437–459
Hogarth, R. M. and Karelaia, N. (2003), “Take-the-Best” and Other Simple Strategies: Why and When They Work “Well” in Binary Choice, Universitat Pompeu Fabra working paper, Barcelona, Spain.
Hogarth, R. M. and Karelaia, N. (in press), Simple models for multi-attribute choice with many alternatives: When it does and does not pay to face tradeoffs with binary attributes, Management Science.
A.B. Hollingshead (1996) ArticleTitleThe rank-order effect in group decision making Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 68 181–193 Occurrence Handle10.1006/obhd.1996.0098
N. Karelaia (2004) The Role of Redundant Information in Choice: The Lure of Consistency University Pompeu Fabra working paper Barcelona, Spain
J.R. Larson P.G. Foster-Fishman C.B. Keys (1994) ArticleTitleDiscussion of shared and unshared information in decision-making groups Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 67 446–461 Occurrence Handle10.1037/0022-3514.67.3.446
R.P. Laughlin A.L. Ellis (1986) ArticleTitleDemonstrability and social combination processes on mathematical intellective tasks Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 22 177–189 Occurrence Handle10.1016/0022-1031(86)90022-3
L. Martignon U. Hoffrage (2002) ArticleTitleFast, Frugal, and fit: Simple heuristics for paired comparison Theory and Decision 52 29–71 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1015516217425
B.E. Mennecke (1997) ArticleTitleUsing group support systems to discover hidden profiles: An examination of the influence of group size and meeting structures on information sharing and decision quality International Jouranal of Human Computer Studies 47 387–405 Occurrence Handle10.1006/ijhc.1997.0136
J.W. Payne J.R. Bettman E.J. Johnson (1993) The Adaptive Decision Maker Cambridge University Press New York
T. Remier A.-L. Bornstein K. Opwis (2005) Positive and nagative transfer effects in groups T. Betsch Haberstroh (Eds) Routine decision making Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Mahwah, NJ 175–192
T. Reimer U. Hoffrage (2003) Information aggregation in groups: the approach of Simple Group Heuristics (SIGH) R. Alterman D. Kirsch (Eds) Proceedings of the Twenty Fifth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society Cognitive Science Society Boston 982–987
T. Reimer U. Hoffrage (2005) ArticleTitleCan simple group heuristics detect hidden profiles in rendomly generated environments? Swiss Journal of Psychology 64 IssueID1 21–37 Occurrence Handle10.1024/1421-0185.64.1.21
T. Reimer K. Katsikopoulos (2004) ArticleTitleThe use of recognition in group decision-making Cognitive Science 28 IssueID6 1009–1029 Occurrence Handle10.1016/j.cogsci.2004.06.004
Rieskamp J., and Hoffrage U. (1999). When do people use simple heuristics, and how can we tell?. In: Gigerenzer G., Todd P.M. and The ABC Research Group, Simple Heuristics that Make us Smart, Oxford University Press, New York, (pp. 141–167)
M. Schittekatte A. Hiel ParticleVan (1996) ArticleTitleEffects of partially shared information and awareness of unshared information on infromation sampling Small Group Reserach 27 431–449
H.A. Simon (1982) Models of Bounded Rationality MIT Press Cambridge, MA
G. Stasser (1988) ArticleTitleComputer simulation as a research tool: the DISCUSS model of group decision making Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 24 393–422 Occurrence Handle10.1016/0022-1031(88)90028-5
G. Stasser (1992) ArticleTitleInformation salience and the discovery of hidden profiles by decision-making groups: a “thought experiment” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Making 52 156–181 Occurrence Handle10.1016/0749-5978(92)90049-D
G. Stasser D.D. Stewart G.M. Wittenbaum (1995) ArticleTitleExpert roles and infromation exchange during discussion: he importance of knowing who knows what Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 31 244–265 Occurrence Handle10.1006/jesp.1995.1012
G. Stasser L.A. Taylor C. Hanna (1989) ArticleTitleInformation sampling in structured and unstructured discussions of three- and six-person groups Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 57 67–78 Occurrence Handle10.1037/0022-3514.57.1.67
G. Stasser W. Titus (1985) ArticleTitlePooling of unshared infromation in group decision making: iased infromation sampling during discussion Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 48 1467–1478 Occurrence Handle10.1037/0022-3514.48.6.1467
D.D. Stewart R.S. Billings G. Stasser (1998) ArticleTitleAccountability and the discussion of unshared, Critical infromation in decision-making groups Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice 2 18–23 Occurrence Handle10.1037/1089-2699.2.1.18
Todd, P. M. and Gigerenzer, G. (1999), What we have learned (so far), in G. Gigerenzer, P. M. Todd and The ABC Reserach Group, Simple Heuristics that Make us Smart, Oxford University Press, New York, (pp. 357–365).
A. Tversky (1972) ArticleTitleElimination by Aspects: a theory of choice Psychological Review 79 281–299
V.H. Vroom (1969) Industrial social psychology G. Lindzey E. Aronson (Eds) Handbook of Social Psychology NumberInSeriesVol 5 Addison-Wesley Reading, MA 196–268
G.M. Wittenbaum G. Stasser (1996) Management of information in small groups J.L. Nye Brower (Eds) What’s Social About Social Cognition? Sage London 3–28
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Reimer, T., Hoffrage, U. The Ecological Rationality of Simple Group Heuristics: Effects of Group Member Strategies on Decision Accuracy. Theor Decis 60, 403–438 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11238-005-4750-2
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11238-005-4750-2