Abstract
In his book The Evolution of Individuality, Leo Buss attacks a central dogma of the neo-Darwinian (or synthetic) theory of evolution, the idea that the individual is the sole unit of selection, by arguing that individuals themselves emerged as the result of selective forces that regulated the replication of cell lineages for the benefit of the whole organism. Buss also argues that metazoan developmental patterns and life cycles are the products of selection operating on different units of selection, and that there have been transitions between different units of selection during the history of life. Despite the revolutionary character of this book, The Evolution of Individuality in many ways reflects the adaptationist thinking often associated with the synthetic theory. Buss' framework could be improved by giving further consideration to chance factors in the evolution of development, and examining the details of the evolution of ontogeny in more depth.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Brandon, R.: 1990, Adaptation and the Environment, Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J.
Buss, L.: 1987, The Evolution of Individuality, Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J.
Dawkins, R.: 1982, The Extended Phenotype, W.H. Freeman, San Francisco.
Eldredge, N.: 1985, Unfinished Synthesis, Oxford University Press, New York.
Gould, S. and R. Lewontin: 1979, ‘The Spandrels of San Marco and the Panglossian Paradigm: A Critique of the Adaptationist Programme’, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B, 205, 581–598.
Kimura, M.: 1983, The Neutral Theory of Selection, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Kitcher, P. and Sterelny, K.: 1988 ‘The Return of the Gene’, The Journal of Philosophy 85, 339–361.
Resnik, D.: 1988, ‘Survival of the Fittest: Law of Evolution or Law of Probability’, Biology and Philosophy 3, 349–362.
Resnik, D.: 1989, ‘Adaptationist Explanations’, Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science 20, 193–213.
Sober, E.: 1984, The Nature of Selection, The M.I.T. Press, Cambridge, Mass.
Williams, G.: 1966, Adaptation and Natural Selection, Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J.
Wimsatt, W.: 1980, ‘Reductionistic Research Strategies and Their Biases in the Units of Selection Controversy’, in T. Nickles (ed.), Scientific Discovery: Case Studies, Reidel, Dordrecht, Holland.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
I am grateful to an anonymous reviewer from Biology and Philosophy for helpful comments and criticism.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Resnik, D.B. Discussion: Leo Buss's The Evolution of Individuality . Biol Philos 7, 453–460 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00130062
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00130062