Skip to main content
Log in

The Role of Rhetoric in Rational Argumentation

  • Published:
Argumentation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The structure of this discussion will be tripartite. First it will set out a way of distinguishing between rhetoric and strictly rational argumentation. Next it will consider some of the ramifications of this proposed way of looking at the matter – in particular what its implications are for rationality and for rhetoric, respectively. Finally it examines how this perspective bears on the project of philosophizing. The paper's ultimate aim, accordingly, is to consider what light such an analysis can shed upon philosophy and philosophizing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rescher, N. The Role of Rhetoric in Rational Argumentation. Argumentation 12, 315–323 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007716519105

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007716519105

Navigation