Skip to main content
Log in

A Study of Management Perceptions of the Impact of Corporate Social Responsibility on Organisational Performance in Emerging Economies: The Case of Dubai

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Although a number of studies have shown that corporate social responsibility (CSR) activities often lead to greater organisational performance in western developed economies, researchers are yet to examine the strategic value of CSR in emerging economies. Using survey data from 280 firms operating in Dubai, this study examines the link between CSR activities and organisational performance. The results show that CSR has a positive relationship with all three measures of organisational performance: financial performance, employee commitment, and corporate reputation. These results reinforce the accumulating body of empirical support for the positive impact of CSR on performance and challenge the dominant assumption that, given the weak institutional framework in emerging economies, CSR activities drain resources and compromise firms’ competitiveness.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abott, W., & Monsen, R. (1979). On the Measurement of Corporate Social Responsibility: Self Reported Disclosures and a Method of Measuring Corporate Social Involvement. Academy of Management Journal, 22, 501–515. doi:10.2307/255740

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aguilera, R., Ruth, V., Rupp, D., Williams, C., & Ganapathi, J. (2007). Putting the S Back in Corporate Social Responsibility: A Multilevel Theory of Social Change in Organizations. Academy of Management Review, 32, 836–863

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Albinger, H., & Freeman, S. (2000). Corporate Social Performance and Attractiveness as an Employer to Different Job Seeking Populations. Journal of Business Ethics, 28, 243–253. doi:10.1023/A:1006289817941

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allouche, J., & Laroche, P. (2006). ‹The Relationship between Corporate Social Responsibility and Corporate Financial Performance: A Survey’. In: J. Allouche (eds.), Corporate Social Responsibility: Performance and Stakeholders (pp. 3–40). Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, D. C. (1982). The Satisfied Consumer: Service Return Behavior in the Hospital Obstetrics Market. Journal of Health Care Marketing, 2, 25–33

    Google Scholar 

  • Armstrong, J. S., & Overton, S. T. (1977). Estimating Nonresponse Bias in Mail Surveys. JMR, Journal of Marketing Research, 14, 396–402. doi:10.2307/3150783

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aupperle, K., Caroll, A., & Hatfield, J. (1985). An Examination of the Relationship between Corporate Social Responsibility and Profitability. Academy of Management Journal, 28, 446–463. doi:10.2307/256210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Backhaus, K., Stone, B., & Heiner, K. (2002). Exploring the Relationship between Corporate Social Performance and Employer Attractiveness. Business & Society, 41, 292–319. doi:10.1177/0007650302041003003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bagozzi, R. P., & Lynn, P. W. (1982). Representing and Testing Organizational Theories: A Holistic Construal. Administrative Science Quarterly, 27, 459–489. doi:10.2307/2392322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (1988). On the Evaluation of Structural Equation Models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 16, 74–94. doi:10.1007/BF02723327

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barney, J. (1991). Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage. Journal of Management, 17, 99–120. doi:10.1177/014920639101700108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative Fit Indexes in Structural Equation Modelling. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 238–246 . doi:10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhattacharya, C. B., & Sen, S. (2003). ‹Consumer–Company Identification: A Framework for Understanding Consumers’ Relationships with Companies’. Journal of Marketing, 67, 76–88. doi:10.1509/jmkg.67.2.76.18609

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blowfield, M., & Frynas, G. J. (2005b). Setting New Agendas: Critical Perspectives on Corporate Social Responsibility in the Developing World. International Affairs, 81, 499–513. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2346.2005.00465.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural Equations with Latent Variables (New York: Wiley and Sons)

    Google Scholar 

  • Bragdon, J. H., & Marlin, J. T. (1979). Is Pollution Profitable? Risk Management, 19, 9–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Branco, C. M., & Rodrigues, L. L. (2006). Corporate Responsibility and Resource-Based Perspectives. Journal of Business Ethics, 69, 111–132. doi:10.1007/s10551-006-9071-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Budhwar, P. and K. Mellahi: 2007, ‹Introduction: Human Resource Management in the Middle East’, International Journal of Human Resource Management 18, 1–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, J. L.: 2006, ‹Institutional Analysis and the Paradox of Corporate Social Responsibility’, The American Behavioral Scientist 49, 925–938

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, A. B.: 1991, ‹The Pyramid of Corporate Social Responsibility: Towards the Moral Management of Organizational Stakeholders’, Business Horizons (July/August), 39–48. doi:10.1016/0007-6813(91)90005-G

  • Davidson, W. N., & Worrell, L. D. (1990). A Comparison and Test of the Use of Accounting and Stock Market Data in Relating Corporate Social Responsibility and Financial Performance. Akron Business and Economic Review, 21, 7–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Deephouse, D. (2000). Media Reputation as a Strategic Resource: An Integration of Mass Communication and Resource-based Theories. Journal of Management, 26, 1091–1112. doi:10.1177/014920630002600602

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delaney, J., & Huselid, M. (1996). The Impact of Human Resource Management Practices on Perceptions of Organizational Performance. Academy of Management Journal, 39, 949–969. doi:10.2307/256718

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deshpande, R., Farley, U. J., & Webster, E. F. (1993). Corporate Culture, Customer Orientation, and Innovativeness in Japanese Firms: A Quadrad Analysis. Journal of Marketing, 57, 23–27. doi:10.2307/1252055

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dillman, D..A. (1978). Mail and Telephone Surveys: The Total Design Method. New York: John Wiley and Sons

    Google Scholar 

  • Drawbaugh, K. (2001). Brands in the Balance: Meeting the Challenges of Commercial Identity. Edinbury Gate: Pearson Education Limited

    Google Scholar 

  • Egri, C., I. Maignan, D. Ralston, F. Bowen, J. Gond, C.␣Lo and D. Griffith: 2004, Cross-Cultural Study of Corporate Social and Environmental Responsibility Practices and Benefits. Paper Presented at the Academy of Management (AOM) Conference, Social Issue Management (SIM), New Orleans

  • Fombrun, C. J., Gardberg, A. N., & Sever, M. J. (2000). The reputation quotientSM: A Multi-Stakeholder Measure of Corporate Reputation’. The Journal of Brand Management, 7, 241–255

    Google Scholar 

  • Fombrun, C., & Shanley, M. (1990). ‹What’s in a Name? Reputation Building and Corporate Strategy’. Academy of Management Journal, 33, 233–258. doi:10.2307/256324

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foo, L. M. (2007). Stakeholder Engagement in Emerging Economies: Considering the Strategic Benefits of Stakeholder Management in a Cross-cultural and Geopolitical Context. Corporate Governance, 7, 379–387

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fornell, C., & Larcker, G. D. (1981). Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Errors. JMR, Journal of Marketing Research, 18, 39–50. doi:10.2307/3151312

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frynas, J. (2005). The False Developmental Promise of Corporate Social Responsibility: Evidence from Multinational Oil Companies. International Affairs, 81, 581–598. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2346.2005.00470.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galaskiewicz, J. (1991). ‹Making Corporate Actors Accountable: Institution-building in Minneapolis-St. Paul. In W. Powell & P. DiMaggio (eds.), The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis, Chicago: University of Chicago Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Graves, S., & Waddock, S. (1994). Institutional Owners and Corporate Social Performance. Academy of Management Journal, 37, 1034–1046. doi:10.2307/256611

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greening, D., & Turban, D. (2000). Corporate Social Performance as a Competitive Advantage in Attracting a Quality Workforce. Business & Society, 39, 254–280. doi:10.1177/000765030003900302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffin, J., & Mahon, J. (1997). The Corporate Social Performance and Corporate Financial Performance Debate: Twenty-five Years of Incomparable Research. Business & Society, 36, 5–31. doi:10.1177/000765039703600102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hair, J. F., & Anderson, E. R. L. R. Tatham., & Black, C. W. (1998). Multivariate Data Analysis. 5th ed. Upper Saddle River: NJ Prentice Hall

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartman, L. P., Rubin, R. S., & Dhanda, K. K. (2007). The Communication of Corporate Social Responsibility: United States and European Union Multinational Corporations. Journal of Business Ethics, 74, 373–389. doi:10.1007/s10551-007-9513-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hay, R., & Gray, E. (1974). Social Responsibility of Business Managers. Academy of Management Journal, 17, 135–143. doi:10.2307/254777

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hemingway, C. A., & Maclagan, W. P. (2005). ‹Managers’ Personal Values as Drivers of Corporate Social Responsibility’. Journal of Business Ethics, 50, 33–44. doi:10.1023/B:BUSI.0000020964.80208.c9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu, L., & Bentler, M. P. (1999). Cutoff Criteria for Fit Indexes in Covariance Structure Analysis: Conventional Criteria versus New Alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55

    Google Scholar 

  • Huber, G. P., & Power, J. D. (1985). Retrospective Reports of Strategic-level Managers: Guidelines for Increasing their Accuracy. Strategic Management Journal, 6, 171–180. doi:10.1002/smj.4250060206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Husted, B., & Allen, D. (2000). Is It Ethical to Use Ethics as Strategy? Journal of Business Ethics, 27, 21–31. doi:10.1023/A:1006422704548

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Husted, B., & Allen, A. D. (2007). Strategic Corporate Social Responsibility and Value Creation among Large Firms: Lessons from the Spanish Experience. Long Range Planning, 40, 594–610. doi:10.1016/j.lrp.2007.07.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Husted, B., & Salazar, J. (2006). Taking Friedman Seriously: Maximizing Profits and Social Performance. Journal of Management Studies, 43, 75–91. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.2006.00583.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaworski, B., & Kohli, A. (1993). Market Orientation: Antecedents and Consequences. Journal of Marketing, 57, 53–70. doi:10.2307/1251854

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klein, N. (1999). No Logo: Taking Aim at the Brand Bullies. New York: Picador

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolk, A. (2003). Trends in Sustainability Reporting by the Fortune Global 250. Business Strategy and the Environment, 12, 279–291. doi:10.1002/bse.370

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maignan, I., & Ferrell, O. (2004). Corporate Social Responsibility and Marketing: An Integrative Framework. Academy of Marketing Science, 32, 3–19. doi:10.1177/0092070303258971

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maignan, I., Ferrell, O., & Hult, G. (1999). Corporate Citizenship: Cultural Antecedents and Business Benefits. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 27, 455–469. doi:10.1177/0092070399274005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Margolis, J., & Walsh, J. (2001). People and Profits? The Search for a Link between Company’s Social and Financial Performance. New Jersey: Mahwah

    Google Scholar 

  • Margolis, J., & Walsh, J. (2003). Misery Loves Companies: Rethinking Social Initiatives by Business. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48, 268–305. doi:10.2307/3556659

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marom, I. Y. (2006). Toward a Unified Theory of the CSP–CFP Link. Journal of Business Ethics, 67, 191–200. doi:10.1007/s10551-006-9023-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGuire, J., Dow, S., & Argheyd, K. (2003). CEO Incentives and Corporate Social Performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 45, 341–359. doi:10.1023/A:1024119604363

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGuire, J. B., Sundgren, A., & Schneeweis, T. (1988). Corporate Social Responsibility and Firm Financial Performance. Academy of Management Journal, 31, 854–872. doi:10.2307/256342

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McWilliams, A. and D. Siegel: 2000, `Corporate Social Responsibility and Financial Performance: Correlation or Misspecification?', Strategic Management Journal 21, 603–609. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(200005)21:5<603::AID-SMJ101>3.0.CO;2-3

  • McWilliams, A., & Siegel, D. (2001). Corporate Social Responsibility: A Theory of the Firm Perspective. Academy of Management Review, 26, 117–127. doi:10.2307/259398

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McWilliams, A., Siegel, D., & Wright, M. (2006). Corporate Social Responsibility: Strategic Implications. Journal of Management Studies, 43, 1–18. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.2006.00580.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mellahi, K. (2007). ‘The Effect of Regulations on HRM: Private Sector Firms in Saudi Arabia’. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 18, 85–99

    Google Scholar 

  • Mellahi, K., & Wood, G. (2003). The Ethical Business: Possibilities, Challenges and Controversies. London: Palgrave-McMillan

    Google Scholar 

  • Moneva, J., Riviera-Lirio, J., & Munoz-Torres, M. (2007). The Corporate Stakeholder Commitment and Social and Financial Performance. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 107, 84–102. doi:10.1108/02635570710719070

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore, G. (2001). Corporate Social and Financial Performance: An Investigation in the U.K. Supermarket Industry. Journal of Business Ethics, 34, 299–315. doi:10.1023/A:1012537016969

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moskowitz, M. (1972). Choosing Socially Responsible Stocks. Business and Society Review, 1, 72–75

    Google Scholar 

  • North, D.C. (1990). Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Orlitzky, M., Schmidt, F., & Rynes, S. (2003). Corporate Social and Financial Performance: A Meta-analysis. Organization Studies, 24, 403–441. doi:10.1177/0170840603024003910

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parry, M., N. Arnell, M. Hulme, R. Nicholls and M. Livermore: 1998, ‹Adapting to the Inevitable’, Nature 395, 741. doi:10.1038/27316

  • Pava, M. L., & Krausz, J. (1995). Corporate Responsibility and Financial Performance: The Paradox of Social Cost. Westport, CT: Quorum Books

    Google Scholar 

  • Pedersen, E., & Huniche, M. (2006). Corporate Citizenship in Developing Countries. Copenhagen: Copenhagen Business School Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, D. (2004). The Relationship between Perceptions of Corporate Citizenship and Organizational Commitment. Business & Society, 43, 296–319. doi:10.1177/0007650304268065

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ping, R. A. (2004). On Assuring Valid Measures for Theoretical Models Using Survey Data. Journal of Business Research, 57, 125–141. doi:10.1016/S0148-2963(01)00297-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Preston, L. (1978). Research in Corporate Social Performance and Policy. Greenwich, CT: Jai Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, P., & Dowling, G. (2002). Corporate Reputation and Sustained Superior Financial Performance. Strategic Management Journal, 23, 1077–1093. doi:10.1002/smj.274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rupp, D., Ganapathi, J., Aguilera, R., & Williams, C. (2006). Employee Reactions to Corporate Social Responsibility: An Organizational Justice Framework. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27, 537–543. doi:10.1002/job.380

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salzman, O., Ionescu-Somers, A., & Steger, U. (2005). The Business Case for Corporate Sustainability: Literature Review and Research Options. European Management Journal, 23, 27–36. doi:10.1016/j.emj.2004.12.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Samiee, S., & Roth, K. (1992). The Influence of Global Marketing Standardization on Performance. Journal of Marketing, 56, 1–17. doi:10.2307/1252038

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schuler, D. H., & Cording, M. (2006). A Corporate Social Performance – Corporate Financial Performance Behavioral Model for Consumers. Academy of Management Review, 31, 540–559

    Google Scholar 

  • Shamsie, J. (2003). The Context of Dominance: An Industry-driven Framework for Exploiting Reputation. Strategic Management Journal, 24, 199–216. doi:10.1002/smj.291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slater, S. F., Olson, E. M., & Hult, T. (2006). The Moderating Influence of Strategic Orientation on the Strategy Formation Capability - Performance Relationship. Strategic Management Journal, 27, 1221–1231. doi:10.1002/smj.569

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spencer, B. A., & Taylor, G. S. (1987). A Within and Between Analysis of the Relationship between Corporate Social Responsibility and Financial Performance. Akron Business and Economic Review, 18, 7–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Spicer, B. (1980). ‹Market Risk, Accounting Data and Companies’ Pollution Control Records’. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 5, 67–83. doi:10.1111/j.1468-5957.1978.tb00175.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stanwick, P., & Stanwick, S. (1998). The Relationship between Corporate Social Performance and Organizational Size, Financial Performance and Environmental Performance: An Empirical Examination. Journal of Business Ethics, 17, 195–204. doi:10.1023/A:1005784421547

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swanson, D. (1995). Addressing a Theoretical Problem by Reorienting the Corporate Social Performance Model. Academy of Management Review, 20, 43–64. doi:10.2307/258886

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swanson, D. (1999). Toward an Integrative Theory of Business and Society: A Research Strategy for Corporate Social Performance. Academy of Management Review, 24, 506–521. doi:10.2307/259139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turban, D., & Greening, D. (1997). Corporate Social Performance and Organizational Attractiveness to Prospective Employees. Academy of Management Journal, 40, 658–672. doi:10.2307/257057

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vance, S. C. (1975). Are Socially Responsible Corporations Good Investment Risks? Management Review, 64, 19–24

    Google Scholar 

  • Vitell, S., & Paolillo, J. (2004). A Cross-cultural Study of the Antecedents of the Perceived Role of Ethics and Social Responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 13, 185–199. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8608.2004.00362.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waddock, S. and S. Graves: 1997, `The Corporate Social Performance–Financial Performance Link', Strategic Management Journal 18, 303–319. doi:10.1002/(SICI) 1097-0266(199704)18:4<303::AID-SMJ869>3.0.CO;2-G

  • Whitley, R. (1992). Business Systems in East Asia: Firms, Markets, and Societies. London, Newbury Park: Sage

    Google Scholar 

  • Windsor, D. (2001). The Future of Corporate Social Responsibility. The International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 9, 225–256. doi:10.1108/eb028934

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wokutch, R., & McKinney, E. (1991). Behavioral and Perceptual Measures of Corporate Social Performance. Research in Corporate Social Performance and Policy, 12, 309–330

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, D. (1991). Corporate Social Performance Revisited. Academy of Management Review, 16, 691–718. doi:10.2307/258977

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wood, D. J., & Jones, E. R. (1995). Stakeholder Mismatching: A Theoretical Problem in Empirical Research on Corporate Social Performance. The International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 3, 229–267. doi:10.1108/eb028831

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright, P. and S. Ferris: 1997, `Agency Conflict and Corporate Strategy: The Effect of Divestment on Corporate Value', Strategic Management Journal 18, 77–83. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199701)18:1<77:: AID-SMJ810>3.0.CO;2-R

  • Wright, M., Filatotchev, I., Buck, T., & Bishop, K. (2003). Is Stakeholder Corporate Governance Appropriate in Russia? Journal of Management and Governance, 7, 263–290. doi:10.1023/A:1025022224413

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kamel Mellahi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rettab, B., Brik, A.B. & Mellahi, K. A Study of Management Perceptions of the Impact of Corporate Social Responsibility on Organisational Performance in Emerging Economies: The Case of Dubai. J Bus Ethics 89, 371–390 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-008-0005-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-008-0005-9

Keywords

Navigation