Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-2pzkn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-20T16:56:01.093Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Reuniting Ethics and Social Science: The Oxford Handbook of International Relations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 March 2011

Christian Reus-Smit  and
Duncan Snidal
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Essays
Information
Ethics & International Affairs , Volume 22 , Issue 3 , Fall 2008 , pp. 261 - 271
Copyright
Copyright © Carnegie Council for Ethics in International Affairs 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Notes

1 E. H. Carr, The Twenty Years’ Crisis, 1919–1939(Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan, 2001), p. 6.

2 Christian Reus-Smit and Duncan Snidal, “Between Utopia and Reality: The Practical Discourses of International Relations,” in Christian Reus-Smit and Duncan Snidal, eds., Oxford Handbook of International Relations(New York: Oxford University Press, 2008).

3 The Oxford Handbook of International Relations(hereafter OHIR) provides a comprehensive overview of the field. Its major sections address, respectively: different ways of imagining the discipline; the major theoretical perspectives; contending methodological approaches; the boundaries between International Relations and related fields, such as international law and strategic studies; the relationship between the scholar and the policy-maker; the issue of the field's diversity; and a selection of visions by eminent and new voices regarding how the field ought to be developing.

4 William Wohlforth, “Realism,” OHIR, ch. 7.

5 Jack Donnelly, “The Ethics of Realism,” OHIR, ch. 8.

6 Robert Ayson, “Strategic Studies,” OHIR, ch. 32.

7 David Lake, “The State and International Relations,” OHIR, ch. 2.

8 Joel Quirk, “Historical Methods,” OHIR, ch. 30.

9 Andrew H. Kydd, “Methodological Individualism and Rational Choice,” OHIR, ch. 25.

10 John Ravenhill, “International Political Economy,” OHIR, ch. 31.

11 Andrew Moravcsik, “The New Liberalism,” OHIR, ch. 13.

12 Michael Barnett and Kathryn Sikkink, “From International Relations to Global Society,” OHIR, ch. 3.

13 Tim Dunne, “The English School,” OHIR, ch. 15.

14 Michael Byers, “International Law,” OHIR, ch. 35.

15 Arthur A. Stein, “Neoliberal Institutionalism,” OHIR ch. 11.

16 James L. Richardson, “The Ethics of Neoliberal Institutionalism,” OHIR, ch. 12.

17 Peter J. Katzenstein and Rudra Sil, “Eclectic Theorizing in the Study and Practice of International Relations,” OHIR, ch. 6.

18 Andrew Bennett and Colin Elman, “Case Study Methods,” OHIR, ch. 29.

19 Richard Price, “The Ethics of Constructivism,” OHIR, ch. 18; see also Richard Price, ed., Moral Limit and Possibility in World Politics(Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008).

20 Robyn Eckersley, “The Ethics of Critical Theory,” OHIR, ch. 20.

21 Allen Buchanan and Robert O. Keohane, “The Preventive Use of Force: A Cosmopolitan Institutional Proposal,” Ethics & International Affairs 18, no. 1 (2004), pp. 1–22; and Robyn Eckersley, The Green State: Rethinking Democracy and Sovereignty(Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 2004).

22 Friedrich Kratochwil, “Sociological Approaches,” OHIR, ch. 26; and James Goldgeier and Philip Tetlock, “Psychological Approaches,” OHIR, ch. 27.

23 Henry R. Nau, “Scholarship and Policy-making: Who Speaks Truth to Whom?” OHIR, ch. 36; and Joseph S. Nye, Jr., “International Relations: The Relevance of Theory to Practice,” OHIR, ch. 37.