Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Driving Factors for the Success of the Green Innovation Market: A Relationship System Proposal

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study aims to map out the relationships that make up green innovation initiatives in Brazilian industry. The sample comprised 100 managers at manufacturing companies, most of them operating in the business of farm machinery and equipment (45 managers) and steel structures (14 managers). To develop this study, Medeiros et al. (J Clean Prod 65:76–86, 2014) study, mapping critical factors that drive the success of green product innovation and the paradigm of complexity, was used as a reference study. Based on the results, it was possible to identify that the operational dynamic of the factors and variables that affect market success do not happen in an isolated or fragmented way; they occur systematically with different contingencies and structured basic and intermediate skills in order to meet the expectations of consumers, laws, and environmental legislation. Initially, the technological expertise factor was noted as very important for sustaining green product innovation. Furthermore, since proactive leaders are an important factor for successfully developing environmentally sustainable products, it must be added to technological expertise as the foundation for developing green innovation. After defining the basis for green product innovation, the intermediary conditions necessary for using the available technology appropriately were mapped out. In this sense, variables such as “elimination of cultural barriers,” “capacity for critical reflective analysis,” and “experimentation” are also very important. In addition, some of the variables of the cross-functional collaboration and market knowledge factors were a part of the structure that organizations need to transform potential into developing green products, which is the basis for the third level of the model. The fourth level of the model has the “meeting consumer expectations” and “following law and legislation” factors, which make up the main goals for developing environmentally sustainable products according to a number of surveys that were conducted.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Albino, V., Dangelico, R. M., & Pontrandolfo, P. (2012). Do inter-organizational collaborations enhance a firm’s environmental performance? A study of the largest U.S. companies. Journal of Cleaner Production, 37, 304–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aragón-Correa, J. A., Hurtado-Torres, N., Sharma, S., & García-Morales, V. J. (2008). Environmental strategy and performance in small firms: a resource-based perspective. Journal of Environmental Management, 86(1), 88–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arevalo, J. A. (2010). Critical reflective organizations: An empirical observation of global active citizenship and green politics. Journal of Business Ethics, 96(2), 299–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aschehoug, S. H., Boks, C., & Storen, S. (2012). Environmental information from stakeholders supporting product development. Journal of Cleaner Production, 31, 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baker, W. E., & Sinkula, J. M. (2005). Environmental marketing strategy and firm performance: Effects on new product performance and market share. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 33(4), 461–475.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Battisti, G. (2008). Innovations and the economics of new technology spreading within and across users: Gaps and way forward. Journal of Cleaner Production, 16(1), 22–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beise, M., & Rennings, K. (2005). Lead markets and regulation: A framework for analyzing diffusion of environmental innovations. Ecological Economics, 52(1), 5–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhate, S., & Lawler, K. (1997). Environmentally friendly products: Factors that influence their adoption. Technovation, 17(8), 457–465.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boons, F., & Wagner, M. (2009). Assessing the relationship between economic and ecological performance: Distinguishing system levels and the role of innovation. Ecological Economics, 68(7), 1908–1914.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brécard, D., Hlaimi, B., Lucas, S., Perraudeau, Y., & Salladarré, F. (2009). Determinants of demand for green products: An application to eco-label demand for fish in Europe. Ecological Economics, 69(1), 115–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brito, M. P., Carbone, V., & Blanquart, C. M. (2008). Towards a sustainable fashion retail supply chain in Europe: Organisation and performance. International Journal of Production Economics, 114(2), 534–553.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brouhle, K., & Khanna, M. (2012). Determinants of participation versus consumption in the Nordic Swan eco-labeled market. Ecological Economics, 73, 142–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bryson, J. R., & Lombardi, R. (2009). Balancing product and process sustainability against business profitability: Sustainability as a competitive strategy in the property development process. Business Strategy and the Environment, 18, 97–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Byrne, M. R., & Polonsky, M. J. (2001). Impediments to consumer adoption of sustainable transportation: Alternative fuel vehicles. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 21(12), 1521–1538.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cambra-Fierro, J., Hart, S., & Polo-Redondo, Y. (2008). Environmental respect: Ethics or simply business? A study in the small and medium enterprise (SME) context. Journal of Business Ethics, 82(3), 645–656.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carrillo-Hermosilla, J., Río, P., & Könnölä, T. (2010). Diversity of eco-innovations: Reflections from selected case studies. Journal of Cleaner Production, 18(10–11), 1073–1083.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cetindamar, D. (2007). Corporate social responsibility practices and environmental responsible behavior: The case of the united nations global compact. Journal of Business Ethics, 76(2), 163–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, C. (2001). Design for the environment: A quality-based model for green product development. Management Science, 47(2), 250–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Y.-S. (2007). The driver of green innovation and green image—green core competence. Journal of Business Ethics, 81(3), 531–543.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Y.-S. (2008). The positive effect of green intellectual capital on competitive advantages of firms. Journal of Business Ethics, 77(3), 271–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Y.-S. (2009). The drivers of green brand equity: Green brand image, green satisfaction, and green trust. Journal of Business Ethics, 93(2), 307–319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Y.-S., & Chang, C.-H. (2012). The determinants of green product development performance: Green dynamic capabilities, green transformational leadership, and green creativity. Journal of Business Ethics, 116, 107–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Y.-S., Lai, S.-B., & Wen, C.-T. (2006). The influence of green innovation performance on corporate advantage in taiwan. Journal of Business Ethics, 67(4), 331–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dangelico, R. M., Pontrandolfo, P., & Pujari, D. (2013). Developing sustainable new products in the textile and upholstered furniture industries: Role of external integrative capabilities. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 30(4), 642–658.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Marchi, V. (2012). Environmental innovation and R&D cooperation: Empirical evidence from Spanish manufacturing firms. Research Policy, 41(3), 614–623.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doran, J., & Ryan, G. (2012). Regulation and firm perception, eco-innovation and firm performance. European Journal of Innovation Management, 15(4), 421–441.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eder, P. (2003). Expert inquiry on innovation options for cleaner production in the chemical industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 11(4), 347–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellram, L. M., Tate, W., & Carter, C. R. (2008). Applying 3DCE to environmentally responsible manufacturing practices. Journal of Cleaner Production, 16(15), 1620–1631.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foster, S. T, Jr, Sampson, S. E., & Dunn, S. C. (2000). The impact of customer contact on environmental initiatives for service firms. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 20(2), 187–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fraj-Andrés, E., Martinez-Salinas, E., & Matute-Vallejo, J. (2009). A multidimensional approach to the influence of environmental marketing and organizational performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 88(2), 263–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fritz, M., & Koch, M. (2014). Potentials for prosperity without growth: Ecological sustainability, social inclusion and the quality of life in 38 countries. Ecological Economics, 108, 191–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gold, S., Seuring, S., & Beske, P. (2010). Sustainable supply chain management and inter-organizational resources: A literature review. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 17(4), 230–245.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gonzalez-Benito, J. (2008). The effect of manufacturing pro-activity on environmental management: An exploratory analysis. International Journal of Production Research, 46(24), 7017–7038.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • González-Benito, O., & González-Benito, J. (2008). Implications of market orientation on the environmental transformation of industrial firms. Ecological Economics, 64(4), 752–762.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halila, F., & Rundquist, J. (2011). The development and market success of eco-innovations: A comparative study of eco-innovations in Sweden. European Journal of Innovation Management, 14(3), 278–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hallstedt, S., Ny, H., Robèrt, K.-H., & Broman, G. (2010). An approach to assessing sustainability integration in strategic decision systems for product development. Journal of Cleaner Production, 18(8), 703–712.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halme, M., Anttonen, M., Hrauda, G., & Kortman, J. (2006). Sustainability evaluation of European household services. Journal of Cleaner Production, 14(17), 1529–1540.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanssen, O. J. (1999). Sustainable product systems—experiences based on case projects in sustainable product development. Journal of Cleaner Production, 7(1), 27–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hemel, C., & Cramer, J. (2002). Barriers and stimuli for ecodesign in SMEs. Journal of Cleaner Production, 10(5), 439–453.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horbach, J. (2008). Determinants of environmental innovation—new evidence from German panel data sources. Research Policy, 37(1), 163–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horbach, J., Rammer, C., & Rennings, K. (2012). Determinants of eco-innovations by type of environmental impact—the role of regulatory push/pull, technology push and market pull. Ecological Economics, 78, 112–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Houe, R., & Grabot, B. (2009). Assessing the compliance of a product with an eco-label: From standards to constraints. International Journal of Production Economics, 121(1), 21–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, S. D., & Morgan, R. M. (1996). The resource-advantage theory of competition: Dynamics, path dependencies, and evolutionary dimensions. Journal of Marketing, 60(2), 107–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hussain, A. M. T., & Tschirhart, J. (2013). Economic/ecological tradeoffs among ecosystem services and biodiversity conservation. Ecological Economics, 93, 116–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iyer, G. R. (1999). Business, consumers and sustainable living in an interconnected world: A multilateral ecocentric approach. Journal of Business Ethics, 20(4), 273–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jabbour, C. J. C. (2008). In the eye of the storm: Exploring the introduction of environmental issues in the production function in Brazilian companies. International Journal of Production Research, 48(1), 6315–6339.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jabbour, C. J. C., Santos, F. C. A., Fonseca, S. A., & Nagano, M. S. (2012). Green teams: Understanding their roles in the environmental management of companies located in Brazil. Journal of Cleaner Production, 46, 58–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jamali, D. (2006). Insights into triple bottom line integration from a learning organizational perspective. Business Process Management Journal, 12(6), 809–821.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kammerer, D. (2009). The effects of consumer benefit and regulation on environmental product innovation: Empirical evidence from appliance manufactures in Germany. Ecological Economics, 68(8–9), 2285–2295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kiss, B., Manchón, C. G., & Neij, L. (2013). The role of policy instruments in supporting the development of mineral wool insulation in Germany, Sweden and the United Kingdom. Journal of Cleaner Production, 48, 187–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Köhler, J., Schade, W., Leduc, G., Wiesenthal, T., Schade, B., & Espinoza, L. B. (2013). Leaving fossil fuels behind? An innovation system analysis of low carbon cars. Journal of Cleaner Production, 48, 176–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kohli, A. K., & Jaworski, B. J. (1990). Market orientation: The construct, research propositions, and managerial implications. Journal of Marketing, 54(2), 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kohli, A. K., Jaworski, B. J., & Kumar, A. (1993). Markor: A measure of market orientation. Journal of Marketing Research, 30(4), 467–477.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, J. J., Gemba, K., & Kodama, F. (2006). Analyzing the innovation process for environmental performance improvement. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 73(3), 290–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, R., Tan, K., & Yong, G. (2013). Market demand, green product innovation, and firm performance: Evidence from Vietnam motorcycle industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 40, 101–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malhotra, N. K. (2009). Marketing research: An applied orientation (6th ed., p. 936). Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Matos, S., & Hall, J. (2007). Integrating sustainable development in the supply chain: The case of life cycle assessment in oil and gas and agricultural biotechnology. Journal of Operations Management, 25(6), 1083–1102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maxwell, D., & Van Der Vorst, R. (2003). Developing sustainable products and services. Journal of Cleaner Production, 11(8), 883–895.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGuire, W. (2014). The effect of ISO 14001 on environmental regulatory compliance in China. Ecological Economics, 105, 254–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Medeiros, J. F., Ribeiro, J. L. D., & Cortimiglia, M. N. (2014). Success factors for environmentally sustainable product innovation: A systematic literature review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 65, 76–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mickwitz, P., Hyvättinen, H., & Kivima, P. (2008). ‘The role of policy instruments in the innovation and diffusion of environmentally friendlier technologies: Popular claims versus case study experiences. Journal of Cleaner Production, 16(1), S162–S170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montalvo, C. (2003). Sustainable production and consumption systems—cooperation for change: Assessing and simulating the willingness of the firm to adopt/develop cleaner technologies. The case of the in-bond industry in northern Mexico. Journal of Cleaner Production, 11(4), 411–426.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montalvo, C. (2008). General wisdom concerning the factors affecting the adoption of cleaner technologies: A survey 1990–2007. Journal of Cleaner Production, 16(1), 7–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, G. (2006). Images of organization. New York City: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morin, E. (2000). L’intelligence de la complexité (p. 334). Paris: Editions L’Harmattan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morin, E. (2013). La méthode: Ethique (p. 240). Paris: Editions du Seuil.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morin, E. (2014). Introduction à la pensée complexe (p. 158p). Paris: Les éditions Points.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naranjo-Gil, D. (2009). The influence of environmental and organizational factors on innovation adoptions: Consequences for performance in public sector organizations. Technovation, 29(12), 810–818.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Narver, J. C., & Slater, S. F. (1990). The effect of market orientation on business profitability. Journal of Marketing, 54, 20–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2012). The future of eco-innovation: The role of business models in green transformation, OECD Background Paper, Langelinie Allé 17, Copenhagen, Denmark.

  • Peng, Y.-S., & Lin, S.-S. (2008). Local responsiveness pressure, subsidiary resources, green management adoption and subsidiary´s performance: Evidence from taiwanese manufactures. Journal of Business Ethics, 79(1), 199–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M., Linder, C. (1995). Green and competitive: Ending the stalemate. Harverd Business Review, pp. 119–134, September–October.

  • Pujari, D. (2006). Eco-innovation and new product development: Understanding the influences on market performance. Technovation, 26(1), 76–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pujari, D., Peattie, K., & Wright, G. (2004). Organizational antecedents of environmental responsiveness in industrial new product development. Industrial Marketing Management, 33(5), 381–391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pujari, D., Wright, G., & Peattie, K. (2003). Green and competitive influences of environmental new product development performance. Journal of Business Research, 56(8), 657–671.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rauschmayer, F., Bauler, T., & Schäpke, N. (2015). Towards a thick understanding of sustainability transitions—Linking transition management, capabilities and social practices. Ecological Economics, 109, 211–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rehfeld, K., Rennings, K., & Ziegler, A. (2007). Integrated product policy and environmental product innovations: An empirical analysis. Ecological Economics, 61(1), 91–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rennings, K. (2000). Redefining innovation—eco-innovation research and the contribution from ecological economics. Ecological Economics, 32(2), 319–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spaargaren, G., & Mol, A. (1992). Sociology, environment, and modernity: Ecological modernization as a theory of social change. Society Natural Resources, London, 5, 323–344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Testa, F., Iraldo, F., & Frey, M. (2011). The effect of environmental regulation on firms’ competitive performance: The case of the building & construction sector in some EU regions. Journal of Environmental Management, 92(9), 2136–2144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tranfield, D., Denyer, D., & Smart, P. (2003). Towards a methodology for developing evidence-informed management knowledge by means of systematic review. British Journal of Management, 14(3), 207–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Triebswetter, U., & Wackerbauer, J. (2008). Integrated environmental product innovation in the region of Munich and its impact on company competitiveness. Journal of Cleaner Production, 16(14), 1484–1493.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vachon, S., & Klassen, R. D. (2008). Environmental management and manufacturing performance: The role of collaboration in the supply chain. International Journal of Production Economics, 111(2), 299–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Visser, R., Jongen, M., & Zwetsloot, G. (2008). ‘Business-driven innovations towards more sustainable chemical products. Journal of Cleaner Production, 16(1), S85–S94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Welsch, H., & Kühling, J. (2009). Determinants of pro-environmental consumption: The role of reference groups and routine behavior. Ecological Economics, 69(1), 166–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yalabik, B., & Fairchild, R. J. (2011). Customer, regulatory, and competitive pressure as drivers of environmental innovation. International Journal of Production Economics, 131(2), 519–527.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zailani, S. H. M. Z., Eltayeb, T. K., Hsu, C.-C., & Tan, K. C. (2012). The impact of external institutional drivers and internal strategy on environmental performance. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 32(6), 721–745.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu, Q., Sarkis, J., & Geng, Y. (2005). Green supply chain management in China: Pressures, practices and performance. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 25(5), 449–468.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zott, C., Amit, R., Massa, L. (2010). The Business model: Theoretical roots, recent developments, and future research, IESE Business School Working paper, No. 862, University of Navarra, Pamplona.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Graduate Business Program, Universidade de Passo Fundo, Passo Fundo, Brazil

    Janine Fleith de Medeiros

  2. Graduate Business Program, Universidade de Caxias do Sul, Campus Universitário da Região Vinhedos, R. João Dal Sasso, 800, Caxias do Sul, RS, 95700000, Brazil

    Gabriel Vidor

  3. Industrial Engineering, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil

    José Luís Duarte Ribeiro

Authors
  1. Janine Fleith de Medeiros
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Gabriel Vidor
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. José Luís Duarte Ribeiro
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gabriel Vidor.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

de Medeiros, J.F., Vidor, G. & Ribeiro, J.L.D. Driving Factors for the Success of the Green Innovation Market: A Relationship System Proposal. J Bus Ethics 147, 327–341 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2927-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2927-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation