Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter Mouton July 20, 2019

Semiotic alignment: Towards a dialogical model of interspecific communication

  • Ignasi Ribó ORCID logo EMAIL logo
From the journal Semiotica

Abstract

Communicative interactions across different species have so far received relatively little attention from cognitive or behavioral scientists. Most research in this area views the process of communication as the adaptive interaction of manipulative signalers and information-assessing receivers. This paper discusses some shortcomings of the information/influence model of communication, particularly in the empirical study of interspecific communicative interactions. It then presents an alternative theoretical model, based on recent contributions in psycholinguistics and semiotics. The semiotic alignment model views communication as a dynamic process of joint semiosis resulting in the alignment of the interactants’ own-worlds (Umwelten). It is argued that this model can improve our understanding of communicative interactions between heterospecifics and provide the basis for future work in the empirical study of interspecific communication.

Funding statement: The writing of this research paper has been supported by grant 611A10017 from Mae Fah Luang University’s 2017–2018 Researcher Fund (FY 201).

References

Axén, Annkristin H., Olof Leimar & Veronika Hoffman. 1996. Signalling in a mutualistic interaction. Animal Behaviour 52. 321–333.10.1006/anbe.1996.0178Search in Google Scholar

Baigrie, B. D., A. M. Thompson & T. P. Flower. 2014. Interspecific signalling between mutualists: Food-thieving drongos use a cooperative sentinel call to manipulate foraging partners. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 281(1791). 20141232.10.1098/rspb.2014.1232Search in Google Scholar

Bergmann, Kirsten & Stefan Kopp. 2012. Gestural alignment in natural dialogue. In Naomi Miyake, David Peebles & Richard Cooper (eds.), Proceedings of the thirty-fourth annual conference of the cognitive science society, 1326–1331. Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.Search in Google Scholar

Bickhard, Mark H. 2007. Language as an interaction system. New Ideas in Psychology 25. 171–187.10.1016/j.newideapsych.2007.02.006Search in Google Scholar

Bradbury, Jack W. & Sandra L. Vehrencamp. 1998. Principles of animal communication. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer.Search in Google Scholar

Bronstein, Judith L. 1994. Conditional outcomes in mutualistic interactions. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 9(6). 214–217.10.1016/0169-5347(94)90246-1Search in Google Scholar

Bshary, Redouan, Andrea Hohner, Karim Ait-el-Djoudi & Hans Fricke. 2006. Interspecific communicative and coordinated hunting between groupers and giant moray eels in the Red Sea. PLoS Biology 4(12). 2393–2398.10.1371/journal.pbio.0040431Search in Google Scholar

Carazo, P. & E. Font. 2010. Putting information back into biological communication. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 23(4). 661–669.10.1111/j.1420-9101.2010.01944.xSearch in Google Scholar

Caro, T. 2005. Antipredator defences in birds and mammals. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Clark, Herbert H. 1996. Using language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511620539Search in Google Scholar

Cummins, Fred. 2011. Gaze and blinking in dyadic conversation: A study in coordinated behaviour among individuals. Language and Cognitive Processes 27. 1525–1549.10.1080/01690965.2011.615220Search in Google Scholar

Dale, Rick, Riccardo Fusaroli, Nicholas D. Duran & Daniel C. Richardson. 2014. The self-organization of human interaction. Psychology of Learning and Motivation 59. 43–95.10.1016/B978-0-12-407187-2.00002-2Search in Google Scholar

Dall, Sasha R. X., Luc Alain Giraldeau, Ola Olsson, John M. McNamara & David W. Stephens. 2005. Information and its use by animals in evolutionary ecology. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 20(4). 187–193.10.1016/j.tree.2005.01.010Search in Google Scholar

Danchin, Etienne, Luc-Alain Giraldeau, Thomas J. Valone & Richard H. Wagner. 2004. Public information: From nosy neighbors to cultural evolution. Science 305(5683). 487–491.10.1126/science.1098254Search in Google Scholar

Dawkins, R. & J. R. Krebs. 1978. Animal signals: Information or manipulation. In J. R. Krebs & N. B. Davies (eds.), Behavioral ecology: An evolutionary approach, 282–309. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific.Search in Google Scholar

Elgier, Angel M., Adriana Jakovcevic, Gabriela Barrera, Alba E. Mustaca & Mariana Bentosela. 2009. Communication between domestic dogs (canis familiaris) and humans: Dogs are good learners. Behavioural Processes 81(3). 402–408.10.1016/j.beproc.2009.03.017Search in Google Scholar

Evans, Christopher S. & Linda Evans. 2007. Representational signalling in birds. Biology Letters 3. 8–11.10.1098/rsbl.2006.0561Search in Google Scholar

Evans, Christopher S. & Peter Marler. 1994. Food calling and audience effects in male chickens, gallus gallus: Their relationships to food availability, courtship and social facilitation. Animal Behaviour 47(5). 1159–1170.10.1006/anbe.1994.1154Search in Google Scholar

Faragó, Tamás, Friederike Range, Zsófia Virányi & Péter Pongrácz. 2009. The bone is mine! Context-specific vocalization in dogs. Journal of Veterinary Behavior: Clinical Applications and Research 4(2). 56–57.10.1016/j.jveb.2008.09.026Search in Google Scholar

Fischer, Julia & Tabitha Price. 2017. Meaning, intention, and inference in primate vocal communication. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews 82. 22–31.10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.10.014Search in Google Scholar

Fitch, W. Tecumseh. 2010. The evolution of language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511817779Search in Google Scholar

Flower, Tom P., Matthew F. Child & Amanda R. Ridley. 2013. The ecological economics of kleptoparasitism: Pay-offs from self-foraging versus kleptoparasitism. Journal of Animal Ecology 82(1). 245–255.10.1111/j.1365-2656.2012.02026.xSearch in Google Scholar

Flower, Tom P., Matthew Gribble & Amanda R. Ridley. 2014. Deception by flexible alarm mimicry in an African bird. Science 344(6183). 513–516.10.1126/science.1249723Search in Google Scholar

Frege, Gottlob. 1948. Sense and reference. Philosophical Review 57(3). 209–230.10.2307/2181485Search in Google Scholar

Frisch, Karl von. 1967. The dance language and orientation of bees. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Fusaroli, Riccardo, Joanna Rączaszek-Leonardi & Kristian Tylén. 2014. Dialog as interpersonal synergy. New Ideas in Psychology 32. 147–157.10.1016/j.newideapsych.2013.03.005Search in Google Scholar

Fusaroli, Riccardo & Kristian Tylén. 2016. Investigating conversational dynamics: Interactive alignment, interpersonal synergy, and collective task performance. Cognitive Science 40(1). 145–171.10.1111/cogs.12251Search in Google Scholar

Gibson, James J. 1986. The ecological approach to visual perception. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Search in Google Scholar

Gill, Sharon A. & Andrea M. K. Bierema. 2013. On the meaning of alarm calls: A review of functional reference in avian alarm calling. Ethology 119(6). 449–461.10.1111/eth.12097Search in Google Scholar

Goodale, Eben, Guy Beauchamp, Robert D. Magrath, James C. Nieh & Graeme D. Ruxton. 2010. Interspecific information transfer influences animal community structure. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 25(6). 354–361.10.1016/j.tree.2010.01.002Search in Google Scholar

Goodale, Eben & Sarath W. Kotagama. 2006. Vocal mimicry by a passerine bird attracts other species involved in mixed-species flocks. Animal Behaviour 72(2). 471–477.10.1016/j.anbehav.2006.02.004Search in Google Scholar

Grafen, Alan. 1990. Biological signals as handicaps. Journal of Theoretical Biology 144(4). 517–546.10.1016/S0022-5193(05)80088-8Search in Google Scholar

Grice, H. P. 1957. Meaning. Philosophical Review 66(3). 377–388.10.2307/2182440Search in Google Scholar

Hauser, Marc D. 1997. The evolution of communication. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/2867.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Hauser, Marc D., Noam Chomsky & W. Tecsumeh Fitch. 2002. The faculty of language: What is it, who has it, and how did it evolve? Science 298(5598). 1569–1579.10.1126/science.298.5598.1569Search in Google Scholar

Heidegger, Martin. 1995. The fundamental concepts of metaphysics: World, finitude, solitude. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.10.2307/j.ctvswx8mgSearch in Google Scholar

Herre, E. A., N. Knowlton, U. G. Mueller & S. A. Rehner. 1999. The evolution of mutualisms: Exploring the paths between conflict and cooperation. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 14(2). 49–53.10.1016/S0169-5347(98)01529-8Search in Google Scholar

Hurford, James R. 2007. The origins of meaning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Isack, H. A. & H. U. Reyer. 1989. Honeyguides and honey gatherers: Interspecific communication in a symbiotic relationship. Science 243(4896). 1343–1346.10.1126/science.243.4896.1343Search in Google Scholar

Jackson, Duncan E. 2008. Interspecific communication: Treehopper alarms make ants come running. Current Biology 18(14). 602–603.10.1016/j.cub.2008.06.019Search in Google Scholar

Järvilehto, Timo. 1998. The theory of the organism-environment system: I. Description of the theory. Integrative Physiological and Behavioral Science 33(4). 321–334.10.1007/BF02688700Search in Google Scholar

Järvilehto, Timo. 2009. The theory of the organism-environment system as a basis of experimental work in psychology. Ecological Psychology 21(2). 112–120.10.1080/10407410902877066Search in Google Scholar

Kostan, Karen M. 2002. The evolution of mutualistic interspecific communication: Assessment and management across species. Journal of Comparative Psychology 116(2). 206–209.10.1037/0735-7036.116.2.206Search in Google Scholar

Krama, Tatjana, Jolanta Vrublevska, Todd M. Freeberg, Cecilia Kullberg, Markus J. Rantala & Indrikis Krams. 2012. You mob my owl, I’ll mob yours: Birds play tit-for-tat game. Scientific Reports 2. 12–14.10.1038/srep00800Search in Google Scholar

Krams, I. 2010. Interspecific communication. In M. D. Breed & J. Moore (eds.), Encyclopedia of animal behavior, vol. 2, 196–202. London: Academic Press.10.1016/B978-0-08-045337-8.00009-7Search in Google Scholar

Krams, I. & T. Krama. 2002. Interspecific reciprocity explains mobbing behaviour of the breeding chaffinches, Fringilla coelebs. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 269(1507). 2345–2350.10.1098/rspb.2002.2155Search in Google Scholar

Kravchenko, Alexander. 2006. Cognitive linguistics, biology of cognition and biosemiotics: Bridging the gaps. Language Sciences 28(1). 51–75.10.1016/j.langsci.2005.02.002Search in Google Scholar

Linell, Per. 2009. Rethinking language, mind, and world dialogically: Interactional and contextual theories of human sense-making. Charlotte, NC: Information Age.Search in Google Scholar

Louwerse, Max M., Rick Dale, Ellen G. Bard & Patrick Jeuniaux. 2012. Behavior matching in multimodal communication is synchronized. Cognitive Science 36(8). 1404–1426.10.1111/j.1551-6709.2012.01269.xSearch in Google Scholar

Macedonia, Joseph M. & Christopher S. Evans. 1993. Variation among mammalian alarm call systems and the problem of meaning in animal signals. Ethology 93. 177–197.10.1111/j.1439-0310.1993.tb00988.xSearch in Google Scholar

Magrath, Robert D., Tonya M. Haff, Pamela M. Fallow & Andrew N. Radford. 2015. Eavesdropping on heterospecific alarm calls: From mechanisms to consequences. Biological Reviews 90(2). 560–586.10.1111/brv.12122Search in Google Scholar

Magrath, Robert D., Benjamin J. Pitcher & Janet L. Gardner. 2007. A mutual understanding? Interspecific responses by birds to each other’s aerial alarm calls. Behavioral Ecology 18(5). 944–951.10.1093/beheco/arm063Search in Google Scholar

Manser, Marta B. 2013. Semantic communication in vervet monkeys and other animals. Animal Behaviour 86(3). 491–496.10.1016/j.anbehav.2013.07.006Search in Google Scholar

Maran, Timo, Dario Martinelli & Aleksei Turovski (eds.). 2011. Readings in zoosemiotics. Berlin & Boston: Walter de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110253436Search in Google Scholar

Maran, Timo, Morten Tønnessen, Kristin Armstrong Oma, Laura Kiiroja, Riin Magnus, Nelly Mäekivi, Silver Rattasepp, Paul Thibault & Kadri Tüür. 2016. Animal umwelten in a changing world: Zoosemiotic perspectives. Tartu: University of Tartu Press.10.26530/OAPEN_620672Search in Google Scholar

Marler, Peter. 1961. The logical analysis of animal communication. Journal of Theoretical Biology 1(3). 295–317.10.1016/0022-5193(61)90032-7Search in Google Scholar

Marler, Peter, Christopher S. Evans & Marc Hauser. 1992. Animal signals: Reference, motivation, or both? In H. Papousek, U. Jürgens & M. Papoufck (eds.), Nonverbal vocal communication: Comparative and developmental approaches, 66–86. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Maturana, Humberto R. 1975. The organization of the living: A theory of the living organization. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies 7(3). 313–332.10.1016/S0020-7373(75)80015-0Search in Google Scholar

Maturana, Humberto R. & Francisco J. Varela. 1980. Autopoiesis and cognition: The realization of the living. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.10.1007/978-94-009-8947-4Search in Google Scholar

Maynard Smith, John & David Harper. 1995. Animal signals: Models and terminology. Journal of Theoretical Biology 177. 305–311.10.1006/jtbi.1995.0248Search in Google Scholar

Maynard Smith, John & David Harper. 2003. Animal signals. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

McGregor, Peter. 2005. Animal communication networks. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511610363Search in Google Scholar

McGregor, Peter & Tom Peake. 2000. Communication networks: Social environments for receiving and signalling behaviour. Acta Ethologica 2(2). 71–81.10.1007/s102110000015Search in Google Scholar

Miklósi, Ádam & Krisztina Soproni. 2006. A comparative analysis of animals’ understanding of the human pointing gesture. Animal Cognition 9(2). 81–93.10.1007/s10071-005-0008-1Search in Google Scholar

Mills, Gregory J. 2014. Dialogue in joint activity: Complementarity, convergence, and conventionalization. New Ideas in Psychology 32(1). 158–173.10.1016/j.newideapsych.2013.03.006Search in Google Scholar

Møller, Anders Pape. 1992. Interspecific response to playback of bird song. Ethology 90(4). 315–320.10.1111/j.1439-0310.1992.tb00842.xSearch in Google Scholar

Morales, Manuel A., Jennifer L. Barone & Charles S. Henry. 2008. Acoustic alarm signalling facilitates predator protection of treehoppers by mutualist ant bodyguards. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 275(1645). 1935–1941.10.1098/rspb.2008.0410Search in Google Scholar

Morris, Charles. 1938. Foundations of the theory of signs. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Search in Google Scholar

Nagel, Thomas. 1974. What is it like to be a bat? Philosophical Review 83(4). 435.10.2307/2183914Search in Google Scholar

Oben, Bert & Geert Brône. 2016. Explaining interactive alignment: A multimodal and multifactorial account. Journal of Pragmatics 104. 32–51.10.1016/j.pragma.2016.07.002Search in Google Scholar

Otte, Daniel. 1974. Effects and functions in the evolution of signaling systems. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 5. 385–417.10.1146/annurev.es.05.110174.002125Search in Google Scholar

Owings, Donald H. & Eugene S. Morton. 1998. Animal vocal communication: A new approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139167901Search in Google Scholar

Owings, Donald H., Matthew P. Rowe & Aaron S. Rundus. 2002. The rattling sound of rattlesnakes (Crotalus Viridis) as a communicative resource for ground squirrels (Spermophilus Beecheyi) and burrowing owls (Athene Cunicularia). Journal of Comparative Psychology 116(2). 197–205.10.1037/0735-7036.116.2.197Search in Google Scholar

Owren, Michael J. & Drew Rendall. 2001. Sound on the rebound: Bringing form and function back to the forefront in understanding nonhuman primate vocal signaling. Evolutionary Anthropology 10. 58–71.10.1002/evan.1014Search in Google Scholar

Partan, Sarah R. 2013. Ten unanswered questions in multimodal communication. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 67(9). 1523–1539.10.1007/s00265-013-1565-ySearch in Google Scholar

Partan, Sarah R. & Peter Marler. 1999. Communication goes multimodal. Science 283(5406). 1272–1273.10.1126/science.283.5406.1272Search in Google Scholar

Partan, Sarah R. & Peter Marler. 2002. The umwelt and its relevance to animal communication: Introduction to special issue. Journal of Comparative Psychology 116(2). 116–119.10.1037/0735-7036.116.2.116Search in Google Scholar

Paxton, A. & R. Dale. 2013. Frame-differencing methods for measuring bodily synchrony in conversation. Behavior Research Methods 45(2). 329–343.10.3758/s13428-012-0249-2Search in Google Scholar

Peirce, Charles S. 1931–1966. The collected papers of Charles S. Peirce, 8 vols., C Hartshorne, P. Weiss & A. W. Burks (eds.). Cambridge: Harvard University Press. [Reference to Peirce’s papers will be designated CP followed by volume and paragraph number.].Search in Google Scholar

Pickering, Martin J. & Simon Garrod. 2004. Toward a mechanistic psychology of dialogue. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27(2). 1–58.10.1017/S0140525X04000056Search in Google Scholar

Pickering, Martin J. & Simon Garrod. 2006. Alignment as the basis for successful communication. Research on Language and Computation 4(2–3). 203–228.10.1007/s11168-006-9004-0Search in Google Scholar

Pickering, Martin J. & Simon Garrod. 2009. Joint action, interactive alignment, and dialog. Topics in Cognitive Science 1(2). 292–304.10.1111/j.1756-8765.2009.01020.xSearch in Google Scholar

Quine, W. V. 1960. Word and object. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Radford, Andrew N., Matthew B. V. Bell, Linda I. Hollén & Amanda R. Ridley. 2011. Singing for your supper: Sentinel calling by kleptoparasites can mitigate the cost to victims. Evolution 65(3). 900–906.10.1111/j.1558-5646.2010.01180.xSearch in Google Scholar

Rainey, Hugo J., Klaus Zuberbühler & Peter J. B. Slater. 2004. Hornbills can distinguish between primate alarm calls. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 271. 755–759.10.1098/rspb.2003.2619Search in Google Scholar

Rasa, Anne O. E. 1983. Dwarf mongoose and hornbill mutualism in the Taru Desert, Kenya. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 12(3). 181–190.10.1007/BF00290770Search in Google Scholar

Reddy, Michael J. 1979. The conduit metaphor: A case of frame conflict in our language about language. In A. Ortony (ed.), Metaphor and thought, 284–324. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Rendall, Drew, Michael J. Owren & Michael J. Ryan. 2009. What do animal signals mean? Animal Behaviour 78. 233–240.10.1016/j.anbehav.2009.06.007Search in Google Scholar

Richardson, Daniel C., Rick Dale & John M. Tomlinson. 2009. Conversation, gaze coordination, and beliefs about visual context. Cognitive Science 33(8). 1468–1482.10.1111/j.1551-6709.2009.01057.xSearch in Google Scholar

Ridley, Amanda R., Matthew F. Child & Matthew B. V. Bell. 2007. Interspecific audience effects on the alarm-calling behaviour of a kleptoparasitic bird. Biology Letters 3(6). 589–591.10.1098/rsbl.2007.0325Search in Google Scholar

Riley, Michael A., Michael J. Richardson, Kevin Shockley & Verónica C. Ramenzoni. 2011. Interpersonal synergies. Frontiers in Psychology 2. 1–7.10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00038Search in Google Scholar

Saussure, Ferdinand de. 1916. Cours de Linguistique Générale, C. Bally, A. Sechehaye & A. Riedlinger (eds.). Lausanne & Paris: Payot.Search in Google Scholar

Scarantino, Andrea. 2010. Animal communication between information and influence. Animal Behaviour 79(6). 1–5.10.1016/j.anbehav.2010.03.005Search in Google Scholar

Scarantino, Andrea & Zanna Clay. 2015. Contextually variable signals can be functionally referential. Animal Behaviour 100. e1–8.10.1016/j.anbehav.2014.08.017Search in Google Scholar

Scott-Phillips, Thomas C. 2008. Defining biological communication. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 21(2). 387–395.10.1111/j.1420-9101.2007.01497.xSearch in Google Scholar

Scott-Phillips, Thomas C. 2010. Animal communication: Insights from linguistic pragmatics. Animal Behaviour 79(1). e1–4.10.1016/j.anbehav.2009.10.013Search in Google Scholar

Scott-Phillips, Thomas C. 2015. Meaning in animal and human communication. Animal Cognition 18(3). 801–805.10.1007/s10071-015-0845-5Search in Google Scholar

Searcy, William A. & Stephen Nowicki. 2005. The evolution of animal communication: Reliability and deception in signaling systems. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Sebanz, Natalie, Harold Bekkering & Günther Knoblich. 2006. Joint action: Bodies and minds moving together. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 10(2). 70–76.10.1016/j.tics.2005.12.009Search in Google Scholar

Sebeok, Thomas Albert. 1990. Essays in zoosemiotics. Toronto: Toronto Semiotic Circle; Victoria College in the University of Toronto.Search in Google Scholar

Sebeok, Thomas Albert. 1991. A sign is just a sign. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Sebeok, Thomas Albert & Marcel Danesi. 2000. The forms of meaning: Modeling systems theory and semiotic analysis. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110816143Search in Google Scholar

Seppänen, Janne-Tuomas, Jukka T. Forsman, Mikko Mönkkönen & Robert L. Thomson. 2007. Social information use is a process across time, space, and ecology, reaching heterospecifics. Ecology 88(7). 1622–1633.10.1890/06-1757.1Search in Google Scholar

Seyfarth, Robert M. & Dorothy L. Cheney. 2003. Signalers and receivers in animal communication. Annual Review of Psychology 54. J45–73.10.1146/annurev.psych.54.101601.145121Search in Google Scholar

Seyfarth, Robert M. & Dorothy L. Cheney. 2017. The origin of meaning in animal signals. Animal Behaviour 124. 339–346.10.1016/j.anbehav.2016.05.020Search in Google Scholar

Seyfarth, Robert M., Dorothy L. Cheney, Thore Bergman, Julia Fischer, Klaus Zuberbühler & Kurt Hammerschmidt. 2010. The central importance of information in studies of animal communication. Animal Behaviour 80(1). 3–8.10.1016/j.anbehav.2010.04.012Search in Google Scholar

Seyfarth, Robert M., Dorothy L. Cheney & Peter Marler. 1980. Vervet monkey alarm calls: Semantic communication in a free-ranging primate. Animal Behaviour 28. 1070–1094.10.1016/S0003-3472(80)80097-2Search in Google Scholar

Shannon, Claude Elwood. 1948. A mathematical theory of communication. Bell System Technical Journal 27. 379–423.10.1002/j.1538-7305.1948.tb01338.xSearch in Google Scholar

Sharpe, Lynda L., Abigail S. Joustra & Michael I. Cherry. 2010. The presence of an avian co-forager reduces vigilance in a cooperative mammal. Biology Letters 6(4). 475–477.10.1098/rsbl.2009.1016Search in Google Scholar

Shockley, Kevin, Daniel C. Richardson & Rick Dale. 2009. Conversation and coordinative structures. Topics in Cognitive Science 1(2). 305–319.10.1111/j.1756-8765.2009.01021.xSearch in Google Scholar

Shockley, Kevin, Marie-Vee Santana & Carol A. Fowler. 2003. Mutual interpersonal postural constraints are involved in cooperative conversation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 29(2). 326–332.10.1037/0096-1523.29.2.326Search in Google Scholar

Silk, Joan B, Elizabeth Kaldor & Robert Boyd. 2000. Cheap talk when interests conflict. Animal Behaviour 59. 423–432.10.1006/anbe.1999.1312Search in Google Scholar

Slocombe, Katie E. & Klaus Zuberbühler. 2005. Functionally referential communication in a chimpanzee. Current Biology 15(19). 1779–1784.10.1016/j.cub.2005.08.068Search in Google Scholar

Smith, William John. 1977. The behavior of communicating: An ethological approach. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.10.4159/9780674043794Search in Google Scholar

Sousa, Ronald De. 2008. Grades of communication. In P. D’Ettorre & D. P. Hughes (eds.), Sociobiology of communication: An interdisciplinary perspective, 275–287. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199216840.003.0016Search in Google Scholar

Sperber, Dan & Deirdre Wilson. 1995. Relevance: Communication and cognition. Oxford: Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar

Stegmann, Ulrich E. (ed.). 2013. Animal communication theory: Information and influence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139003551Search in Google Scholar

Tinbergen, Niko. 1963. On aims and methods of ethology. Zeitschrift Für Tierpsychologie 20. 410–433.10.1017/CBO9780511619991.003Search in Google Scholar

Tobias, J. A., R. Planque, D. L. Cram & N. Seddon. 2014. Species interactions and the structure of complex communication networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 111(3). 1020–1025.10.1073/pnas.1314337111Search in Google Scholar

Tomasello, Michael. 2008. Origins of human communication. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/7551.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Tønnessen, Morten. 2014. Umwelt trajectories. Semiotica 198(1/4). 159–180.10.1515/sem-2013-0106Search in Google Scholar

Tønnessen, Morten, Riin Magnus & Carlo Brentari. 2016. The biosemiotic glossary project: Umwelt. Biosemiotics 9(1). 129–149.10.1007/s12304-016-9255-6Search in Google Scholar

Townsend, Simon W., Sonja E. Koski, Richard W. Byrne, Katie E. Slocombe, Balthasar Bickel, Markus Boeckle, Ines Braga Goncalves, et al. 2017. Exorcising Grice’s ghost: An empirical approach to studying intentional communication in animals. Biological Reviews 92(3). 1427–1433.10.1111/brv.12289Search in Google Scholar

Townsend, Simon W. & Marta B. Manser. 2013. Functionally referential communication in mammals: The past, present, and the future. Ethology 119(1). 1–11.10.1111/eth.12015Search in Google Scholar

Turvey, Michael T. 2009. On the notion and implications of organism-environment system. Ecological Psychology 21(2). 97–111.10.1080/10407410902877041Search in Google Scholar

Uexküll, Jakob von. 1909. Umwelt und innenwelt der tiere. Berlin: Verlag von Julius Springer.Search in Google Scholar

Uexküll, Jakob von. 1926. Theoretical biology. New York: Kegan, Paul, Trench, Trubner.Search in Google Scholar

Uexküll, Jakob von. 1982. The theory of meaning. Semiotica 42(1). 25–79.10.1515/9783110253436.61Search in Google Scholar

Vail, Alexander L., Andrea Manica & Redouan Bshary. 2013. Referential gestures in fish collaborative hunting. Nature Communications 4. 1765.10.1038/ncomms2781Search in Google Scholar

Velmezova, Ekaterina, Kalevi Kull & Stephen J. Cowley (eds.). 2015. Biosemiotic perspectives on language and linguistics. Berlin: Springer.10.1007/978-3-319-20663-9Search in Google Scholar

Vitousek, Maren N., James S. Adelman, Nathan C. Gregory & James J. H. St Clair. 2007. Heterospecific alarm call recognition in a non-vocal reptile. Biology Letters 3(6). 632–634.10.1098/rsbl.2007.0443Search in Google Scholar

Westrip, James R. S. & Matthew B. V. Bell. 2015. Breaking down the species boundaries: Selective pressures behind interspecific communication in vertebrates. Ethology 121(8). 725–732.10.1111/eth.12379Search in Google Scholar

Wheatcroft, David & Trevor D. Price. 2013. Learning and signal copying facilitate communication among bird species. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 280(1757). 20123070.10.1098/rspb.2012.3070Search in Google Scholar

Wheeler, Brandon C. & Julia Fischer. 2012. Functionally referential signals: A promising paradigm whose time has passed. Evolutionary Anthropology 21(5). 195–205.10.1002/evan.21319Search in Google Scholar

Windfelder, Tammy L. 2001. Interspecific communication in mixed-species groups of tamarins: Evidence from playback experiments. Animal Behaviour 61(6). 1193–1201.10.1006/anbe.2000.1701Search in Google Scholar

Zahavi, Amotz. 1975. Mate selection: A selection for a handicap. Journal of Theoretical Biology 53(1). 205–214.10.1016/0022-5193(75)90111-3Search in Google Scholar

Zlatev, Jordan. 2003. Meaning=life (+ culture): An outline of a unified biocultural theory of meaning. Evolution of Communication 4(2). 253–296.10.1075/eoc.4.2.07zlaSearch in Google Scholar

Zuberbühler, Klaus. 2000. Interspecies semantic communication in two forest primates. Proceedings of the Royal Society B 267. 713–718.10.1098/rspb.2000.1061Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2019-07-20
Published in Print: 2019-10-25

© 2019 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 18.4.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/sem-2018-0003/html
Scroll to top button