Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-xtgtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-16T12:31:48.142Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Critical Notice: Robert N. Brandon, Adaptation and Environment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 April 2022

Robert C. Richardson
Robert C. Richardson*
Affiliation:
Department of Philosophy University of Cincinnati
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Review Article
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 63 , Issue 1 , March 1996 , pp. 122 - 136
Copyright
Copyright © 1996 by the Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

†

I am thankful to Philip Kitcher and Robert Brandon for comments on an earlier version of this review.

References

Alberch, P. (1982a), “Developmental Constraints in Evolutionary Processes”, in Bonner (1982), pp. 313–332.Google Scholar
Alberch, P. (1982b), “The Generative and Regulatory Roles of Development in Evolution”, in Mossakowski, D. and Roth, G. (eds.), Environmental Adaptation and Evolution. Stuttgart: Gustav Fischer, pp. 19–36.Google Scholar
Amundson, R. (1994), “Two Concepts of Constraint: Adaptationism and the Challenge from Evolutionary Biology”, Philosophy of Science 61: 556–578.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Antonovics, J., Bradshaw, A. D., and Turner, R. G. (1971), “Heavy Metal Tolerance in Plants”, Advances in Ecological Research 7: 1–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Antonovics, J., and Bradshaw, A. D. (1970), “Evolution in Closely Adjacent Plant Populations. VII. Clinal Patterns at a Mine Boundary”, Heredity 25: 349–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beatty, J., and Finsen, S. (1989), “Rethinking the Propensity Interpretation: A Peek Inside Pandora's Box”, in Ruse (1989), pp. 17–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonner, J. T., (ed.) (1982), Evolution and Development, Dahlem Conference Report No. 20. New York: Springer Verlag.Google Scholar
Brandon, R. (1978), “Adaptation and Evolutionary Theory”, Studies in History and Philosophy of Biology 9: 181–206; as reprinted in Sober (1984b), pp. 58–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brandon, R. (1982), “The Levels of Selection”, in Asquith, P. and Nickles, T. (eds.), PSA 1982, volume 1. East Lansing, MI: Philosophy of Science Association, pp. 315–323.Google Scholar
Brandon, R. (1985), “Adaptation Explanations”, in Depew, D. J. and Weber, B. H. (eds.), Evolution at a Crossroads. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 81–96.Google Scholar
Brandon, R. (1994), “Discussion: Sober on Brandon on Screening-Off and the Levels of Selection”, Philosophy of Science 61: 475–486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burian, R. (1983), “Adaptation”, in Grene, M. (ed.), Dimensions of Darwinism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 287–314.Google Scholar
Dawkins, R. (1978), “Replicator Selection and the Extended Phenotype”, Zeitscrift für Tierpsychologie 47: 61–76.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dennett, D. C. (1995), Darwin's Dangerous Idea: Evolution and the Meanings of Life. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Fetzer, J. (1981), Scientific Knowledge. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gillespie, J. (1977), “Natural Selection for Variances in Offspring Number: A New Evolutionary Principle”, American Naturalist 111: 1010–1014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gould, S. J. (1980), “The Evolutionary Biology of Constraint”, Daedalus 109: 39–52.Google Scholar
Gould, S. J. (1982), “Change in Developmental Timing as a Mechanism of Macroevolution”, in Bonner (1982), pp. 333–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gould, S. J. (1983), “The Hardening of the Modern Synthesis”, in Grene, M. (ed.), Dimensions of Darwinism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 71–93.Google Scholar
Gould, S. J. (1989), Wonderful Life: The Burgess Shale and the Nature of History. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Hacking, I. (1965), Logic of Statistical Inference. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horan, B. L. (1994), “The Statistical Character of Evolutionary Theory”, Philosophy of Science 61: 76–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hull, D. (1980), “Individuality and Selection”, Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 11: 311–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hull, E. 1981. “Units of Evolution: A Metaphysical Essay”, in Jensen, U. L. and Harre, R. (eds.), The Philosophy of Evolution. Brighton: Harvester Press, pp. 23–44.Google Scholar
Jain, S. K., and Bradshaw, A. D. (1966), “Evolutionary Divergence Among Adjacent Plant Populations. I. The Evidence and Its Theoretical Analysis”, Heredity 21: 407–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kane, T. C. and Richardson, R. C. (1990), “The Phenotype as the Level of Selection: Cave Organisms as Model Systems”, in Fine, A., Forbes, M. and Wessels, L. (eds.), PSA 1990, volume 1. East Lansing, MI: Philosophy of Science Association, pp. 151–164.Google Scholar
Lande, R. (1976), “Natural Selection and Random Genetic Drift in Phenotypic Evolution”, Evolution 30: 314–334.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Levins, R., and Lewontin, R. (1985), The Dialectical Biologist. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Lewontin, R. C. (1970), “The Units of Selection”, Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 1: 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewontin, R. C. (1983), “Gene, Organism and Environment,” in Bendali, D. S. (ed.), Evolution from Molecules to Men. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 273–285.Google Scholar
Lloyd, E. (1988), The Structure and Confirmation of Evolutionary Theory. Westport, CN: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
Lloyd, E. (1989), “A Structural Approach to Defining Units of Selection”, Philosophy of Science 56: 395–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacNair, M. (1979), “The Genetics of Copper Tolerance in the Yellow Monkey Flower, Mimulus guttatus. I. Crosses to Nontolerants”, Genetics 91: 553–563.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Maynard Smith, J., Burian, R., Kauffman, S., Alberch, P., Campbell, J., Goodwin, B., Lande, R., Raup, D., and Wolpert, L. (1985), “Developmental Constraints and Evolution”, The Quarterly Review of Biology 60: 265–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayr, E. (1982), “Adaptation and Selection”, Biologisches Zentralblatt 101: 161–174.Google Scholar
Mills, S. and Beatty, J. (1979), “The Propensity Interpretation of Fitness”, Philosophy of Science 46: 263–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reichenbach, H. (1949), The Theory of Probability. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Richardson, R. C. (1985), “Biological Reductionism and Genic Selectionism”, in Sociobiology and Epistemology, Fetzer, J. H. (ed.). Dordrecht: D. Reidel, pp. 133–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richardson, R. C., and Burian, R. M. (1992), “A Defense of Propensity Interpretations of Fitness”, in Fine, A., Forbes, M., and Okruhlik, K. (eds.), PSA 1992, volume 1. East Lansing, MI: Philosophy of Science Association, pp. 349–362.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, A. (1988), “Is the Theory of Natural Selection a Statistical Theory?”, Canadian Journal of Philosophy 14: 187–207.Google Scholar
Rosenzweig, M. L. (1966), “Community Structure in Sympatric Carnivora”, Journal of Mammology 47: 602–612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sober, E. (1980), “Holism, Individualism and the Units of Selection”, in Asquith, P. and Giere, R. (eds.), PSA 1980, volume 2. East Lansing, MI: Philosophy of Science Association, pp. 93–121.Google Scholar
Sober, E. (1984), The Nature of Selection. Cambridge, MA: M.I.T. Press.Google Scholar
Sober, E. (1992), “Screening-Off and the Units of Selection”, Philosophy of Science 59: 142–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sober, E. (1993), Philosophy of Biology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sterelny, K., and Kitcher, P. (1988), “The Return of the Gene”, The Journal of Philosophy 85: 339–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wimsatt, W. C. (1980), “Reductionist Research Strategies and their Biases in the Units of Selection Controversy”, in Nickles, T. (ed.), Scientific Discovery: Case Studies. Dordrecht: D. Reidel, pp. 213–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wimsatt, W. C. (1981), “Units of Selection and the Structure of the Multi-Level Genome,” in Asquith, P. and Giere, R., eds., PSA 1980, volume 2. East Lansing, MI: Philosophy of Science Association, pp. 122–183.Google Scholar