Skip to main content
Log in

Gauge Pressure

  • Review Symposium
  • Published:
Metascience Aims and scope

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Anandan, J. “Remarks Concerning the Geometries of Gravity and Gauge Fields”. in: B.L. Hu, M.P. Ryan and C.V. Vishveshwara (eds.) Directions in General Relativity (Vol. 1) (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993), pp. 10–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashtekar, A. and R. Tate. Lectures on Non-Perturbative Canonical Gravity (Singapore: World Scientific, 1991).

    Google Scholar 

  • Auyang, S. How is Quantum Field Theory Possible? (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995).

    Google Scholar 

  • Baez, J. and Muniain, J. Gauge Fields, Knots and Gravity (River Edge, NJ: World Scientific, 1994).

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrett, J. “Holonomy and Path Structures in General Relativity and Yang–Mills Theory”, International Journal of Theoretical Physics 30 (1991), pp. 1171–1215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belot, G. “Symmetry and Gauge Freedom”, Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 34 (2003), pp. 189–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berry, M. “Quantal Phase Factors Accompanying Adiabatic Changes”, Proceedings of The Royal Society A392 (1984) pp. 45–57

  • Brown, H. R. and O. Pooley. “The Origin of the Spacetime Metric: Bell’s ‹Lorentzian Pedagogy’ and its Significance in General Relativity”, in C. Callender and N. Huggett (eds.), Physics Meets Philosophy at the Planck Scale (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001), pp. 256–273.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cao, T.-Y. Conceptual Developments of 20th Century Field Theories (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998).

    Google Scholar 

  • Catren, G. “Geometric Foundations Of Classical Yang–Mills Theory”, Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 39 (2008), pp. 511–531.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cho, Y. M. “Einstein Lagrangian as the Translational Yang–Mills Lagrangian”, Physical Review D 14 (1976), pp. 2521–2525.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Earman, J. “Locality, Nonlocality, and Action at a Distance: A Skeptical Review of Some Philosophical Dogmas”, in P. Achinstein and R. Kargon (eds.) Kelvin’s Baltimore Lectures and Modern Theoretical Physics: Historical and Philosophical Perspectives (Cambridge: MIT Press, 1987).

    Google Scholar 

  • Earman, J.“Tracking Down Gauge: An Ode to the Constrained Hamiltonian Formalism”, in K. Brading and E. Castellani (eds.) Symmetries in Physics: Philosophical Reflections (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003), pp. 140–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Earman, J. and J. Roberts. “Contact with the Nomic: A Challenge for Deniers of Humean Supervenience about Laws of Nature Part I: Humean Supervenience”, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 71 (2005), pp. 1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gambini, R. and J. Pullin. Loops, Knots, Gauge Theories and Quantum Gravity (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000).

    Google Scholar 

  • Giulini, D. “Remarks on the Notions of General Covariance and Background Independence”, in E. Seiler and I.-O. Stamatescu (eds.) Approaches to Fundamental Physics (Berlin: Springer, 2007)

  • Guay, A. “Essay Review: Conceptual Foundations of Yang–Mills Theories”, Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 39 (2008a) pp. 687–693.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guay, A. “A Partial Elucidation of the Gauge Principle”, Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 39 (2008b), pp. 346–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayashi, K. and T. Shirafuji. “New General Relativity”, Physical Review D 19 (1979) pp. 3524–3553.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Healey, R. “Substance, Modality and Spacetime”, Erkenntnis 42 (1995) pp. 287–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Healey, R. “Change Without Change and How to Observe it in General Relativity”, Synthese 141 (2004) pp. 1–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hehl, F.W., J.D. Mccrea, E.W. Mielke, and Y. Ne’eman. “Metric-Affine Gauge Theory of Gravity: Field Equations, Noether Identities, World Spinors, and Breaking of Dilation Invariance”, Physics Reports 258 (1995) pp. 1–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, C. “Gauge Gravity and the Unification of Natural Forces”, International Studies In The Philosophy of Science 17 (2003) pp. 143–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lyre, H. “Holism and Structuralism in U(1) Gauge Theory”, Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 35 (2004) pp. 643–670.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lyre, H. “Does the Higgs Mechanism Exist?”, International Studies in the Philosophy of Science, in print [Arxiv:0806.1359v1] (2008)

  • Lyre, H., and T.O. Eynck. “Curve it, Gauge it, or Leave it? Practical Underdetermination in Gravitational Theories”, Journal for General Philosophy of Science 34 (2003) pp. 277–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, C. “On Continuous Symmetries and the Foundations of Modern Physics”, in K. Brading and E. Castellani (eds.) Symmetries in Physics: Philosophical Reflections (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003).

    Google Scholar 

  • Nester, J.M. “Is there Really a Problem with the Teleparallel Theory?” Classical and Quantum Gravity 5 (1988) pp. 1003–1010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quine, W.V.O. “Things and Their Place in Theories”, in W.V.O. Quine (ed.) Theories and Things (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1981)

  • Redhead, M.L.G. “The Interpretation of Gauge Symmetry”. in K. Brading and E. Castellani (eds.) Symmetries in Physics: Philosophical Reflections (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rickles, D. Symmetry, Structure and Spacetime (North Holland: Elsevier, 2008).

    Google Scholar 

  • Schilpp, P.A. (ed.), Albert Einstein: Philosopher–Scientist (Lasalle, Illinois: Open Court, 1949).

  • Seevinck, M. “Holism, Physical Theories and Quantum Mechanics”. Studies in the History and Philosophy of Modern Physics. 35 (2004) pp. 693–712.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shapere, A. and F. Wilczek. Geometric Phases in Physics (Singapore: World Scientific, 1989)

  • Stein, H. “On the Notion of Field in Newton, Maxwell and Beyond”, in R. H. Stuewer (ed.) Historical and Philosophical Perspectives of Science (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1970) pp. 264–287.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trautman, A. “Fibre Bundles, Gauge Fields, and Gravitation”, in A. Held (ed.), General Relativity and Gravitation: One Hundred Years after the Birth of Albert Einstein (New York: Plenum Press, 1980) pp. 287–308.

    Google Scholar 

  • Utiyama, R. “Invariant Theoretical Interpretation of Interaction”, Physical Review 101 (1956), pp. 1597–1607.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, D. “Time-Dependent Symmetries: The Link between Gauge Symmetries and Indeterminism”, in K. Brading and E. Castellani (eds.) Symmetries in Physics: Philosophical Reflections (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003) pp. 163–173.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dean Rickles.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rickles, D., Smeenk, C., Lyre, H. et al. Gauge Pressure. Metasci 18, 5–41 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11016-009-9241-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11016-009-9241-6

Keywords

Navigation