Skip to main content
Log in

Larry Laudan, Truth, Error, and Criminal Law: An Essay in Legal Epistemology

Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2006, Hardback ISBN: 0-521-86166-7

  • Book Review
  • Published:
Criminal Law and Philosophy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Notes

  1. For more on these matters, see Uviller (1982).

  2. See Sanchirico (2001).

  3. See for instance, Findley and Scott (2006).

  4. See Weigend (1980).

References

  • Findley, Keith A., & Scott, Michael S. (2006). The multiple dimensions of tunnel vision in criminal cases. Wisconsin Law Review, 2006, 291–397, at 340–341.

  • Sanchirico, Chris William (2001). Character evidence and the object of trial. Columbia Law Review, 101, 1227–1311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uviller, Richard (1982). Evidence of character to prove conduct: Illusion, illogic, and injustice in the courtroom. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 130, 845–891.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weigend, Thomas (1980). Continental cures for American ailments: European criminal procedure as a model for law reform. Crime and Justice, 2, 381–428.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Richard L. Lippke.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lippke, R.L. Larry Laudan, Truth, Error, and Criminal Law: An Essay in Legal Epistemology . Criminal Law, Philosophy 2, 85–89 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11572-007-9040-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11572-007-9040-3

Navigation