Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

An Exploration of the Value of Naturalness and Wild Nature

  • Published:
Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The source of the value of naturalness is of considerable relevance for the conservation movement, to philosophers, and to society generally. However, naturalness is a complex quality and resists straightforward definition. Here, two interpretations of what is “natural” are explored. One of these assesses the naturalness of species and ecosystems with reference to a benchmark date, such as the advent of industrialization. The value of naturalness in this case largely reflects prioritization of the value of biodiversity. However, the foundation of our understanding of naturalness is that it describes processes that are free of human intervention. Conflict between the two interpretations of naturalness is apparent in the claim that naturalness can be enhanced by human intervention, in the form of ecological restoration. Although naturalness in its purest form precludes human intervention, some human activities are also apparently more natural than others. This continuum of naturalness relates to the autonomy of the individual from abstract instrumentalism, which describes a particular form of influence ubiquitous in contemporary society. The value of naturalness reflects both dissatisfaction with these threats to personal autonomy, and respect for wild nature as the embodiment of a larger-than-human realm.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Angermeier P. L. (2000) The Natural Imperative for Biological Conservation. Conservation Biology 14:373–381

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barry D., Oelschlaeger M. (1996) A Science for Survival: Values and onservation Biology. onservation Biology 10:905–911

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brennan A. (1988) Thinking about Nature: An Investigation of Nature, Value and Ecology. London, Routledge

    Google Scholar 

  • Budiansky S. (1995) Nature’s Keepers: The New Science of Nature Management. New York, The Free Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Burgess J. A., Walsh A. J. (1998) Is Genetic Engineering Wrong, Per Se?. The Journal of Value Inquiry 32:393–406

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carruthers P. (1992) The Animals Issue: Moral Theory in Practice. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Cérézuelle D. (2004) Nature and Freedom: An Introduction to the Environmental Thought of Bernard Charbonneau. In: Foltz B. V., Frodeman R. (eds.) Rethinking Nature: Essays in Environmental Philosophy. Bloomington, Indiana University Press, pp. 314–329

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark J. (2002) Bernard Charbonneau: Regionalism and the Politics of Experience. Capitalism, Nature, Socialism 13:41–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cole D. N. (2005) Symbolic Values: The Overlooked Values that Make Wilderness Unique. International Journal of Wilderness 11:23–27

    Google Scholar 

  • Czech B. (2004) A Chronological Frame of Reference for Ecological Integrity and Natural Conditions. Natural Resources Journal 44:1113–1136

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis M. (2002) Dead Cities and Other Tales. New York, The New Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Drew W. (1986) Killing Wilderness. The Trumpeter 3:19–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Elliot R. (1997) Faking Nature: The Ethics of Environmental Restoration. London, Routledge

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis R. J. (1998) The Dark Side of the Left: Illiberal Egalitarianism in America. Lawrence, University Press of Kansas

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox N. (2002) Against the Machine: The Hidden Luddite Tradition in Literature, Art, and Individual Lives. Washington, DC, Island Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox W. (1995) Toward a Transpersonal Ecology: Developing New Foundations for Environmentalism. Foxhole, Resurgence

    Google Scholar 

  • Glover J. M. (2000) Soul of the Wilderness: Can We Stop Trying to Control Nature? International Journal of Wilderness 6:4–8

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodin R. E. (1992) Green Political Theory. Cambridge, Polity Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Haila Y. (1997) A ‚Natural’ Benchmark For Ecosystem Function. Conservation Biology 11:300–301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hargrove E. C. (1989) Foundations of Environmental Ethics. Englewood Cliffs, Prentice Hall

    Google Scholar 

  • Heyd T. (2005) Introduction. In: Heyd T. (ed.) Recognizing the Autonomy of Nature: Theory and Practice. New York, Columbia University Press, pp. 1–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Higgs E. (2003) Nature by Design: People, Natural Process, and Ecological. Restoration Cambridge, The MIT Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Hull R. B., Richert D., Seekamp E., Robertson D., Buhyoff G. J. (2003) Understandings of Environmental Quality: Ambiguities and Values Held by Environmental Professionals. Environmental Management 31:1–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jordan W. R. (1994) ‚Sunflower Forest’: Ecological Restoration as the Basis for a New Environmental Paradigm. In: Baldwin A. D., de Luce J., Pletsch C. (eds.) Beyond Preservation: Restoring and Inventing Landscapes. Minneapolis, University of Minnesota Press, pp. 17–34

    Google Scholar 

  • Jordan W. R. (2005) Autonomy, Restoration, and the Law of Nature, In: Heyd T. (ed.) Recognizing the Autonomy of Nature: Theory and Practice. New York, Columbia University Press, pp. 189–205

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz E. (1997) Nature as Subject: Human Obligation and the Natural Community. Lanham, Rowman & Littlefield

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirkman R. (2002) Skeptical Environmentalism: The Limits of Philosophy and Science. Bloomington, Indiana University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis C. S. (1967) Studies in Words, 2nd edn Cambridge, Cambridge University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindley R. (1986) Autonomy. Houndmills, Macmillan Education

    Google Scholar 

  • Mathews F. (2005) Reinhabiting Reality: Towards a Recovery of Culture. Sydney, University of New South Wales Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Mill J. S. (1969) Three Essays on Religion: Nature, The Utility of Religion, and Theism. Westmead, Gregg International Publishers

    Google Scholar 

  • Norton, B. G. (1986), “Sand Dollar Psychology.” The Washington Post Magazine, June 1, pp 11–14.

  • Norton B. G. (1991) Toward Unity Among Environmentalists. New York, Oxford University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterken G. F. (1996) Natural Woodland: Ecology and Conservation in Northern Temperate Regions. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Povilitis T. (2002) What is a Natural Area?. Natural Areas Journal 22:70–74

    Google Scholar 

  • Price J. (1995) Looking for Nature at the Mall: A Field Guide to the Nature Company. In: Cronon W. (ed.) Uncommon Ground: Toward Reinventing Nature. New York, Norton W. W., pp. 186–203

    Google Scholar 

  • Reed P. (1989) Man Apart: An Alternative to the Self-Realization Approach. Environmental Ethics 11:53–69

    Google Scholar 

  • Ridder, B. (2005), “Reorienting Environmentalism to Nature-Inspired-Autonomy.” Griffith Journal of the Environment 1 http://www.gu.edu.au/faculty/ens/gje. Accessed July 1, 2006.

  • Ridder, B. (2007), “The Naturalness versus Wildness Debate: Ambiguity, Inconsistency, and Unattainable Objectivity.” Restoration Ecology 15, in press.

  • Roebuck P., Phifer P. (1999) The Persistence of Positivism in Conservation Biology. Conservation Biology 13:444–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rolston H. (1991) The Wilderness Idea Reaffirmed. Environmental Professional 13:370–377

    Google Scholar 

  • Rolston H. (1994) Conserving Natural Value. New York, Columbia University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Rolston H. (2001) Natural and Unnatural: Wild and Cultural. Western North American Naturalist 61:267–276

    Google Scholar 

  • Rozin P., Spranca M., Krieger Z., Neuhaus R., Surillo D., Swerdlin A., Wood K. (2004) Natural Preference: Instrumental and Ideational/ Moral Motivation, and the Contrast Between Foods and Medicines. Appetite 43:147–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sagoff M. (1997) Muddle or Muddle Through? Takings Jurisprudence Meets the Endangered Species Act. William and Mary Law Review 38:825–993

    Google Scholar 

  • Sagoff M. (2000) Ecosystem Design in Historical and Philosophical Context. In: Pimentel D., Westra L., Noss R. F. (eds.) Ecological Integrity: Integrating Environment, Conservation, and Health. Washington, DC, Island Press, pp. 61–78

    Google Scholar 

  • Sessions G. (1992) Ecocentrism, Wilderness, and Global Protection. In: Oelschlaeger M. (ed.) The Wilderness Condition: Essays on Environment and Civilization. Washington, DC, Island Press, pp. 90–130

    Google Scholar 

  • Siipi H. (2004) Naturalness in Biological Conservation. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 17:457–477

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simonsen K. H. (1981) The Value of Wildness. Environmental Ethics 3:259–263

    Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, J. A. and E. S. C. Weiner (eds.) (1989), Oxford English Dictionary, Volume 10, 2nd edn. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

  • Soper K. (1995) What is Nature? Culture, Politics and the Non-Human. Oxford, Blackwell

    Google Scholar 

  • Soulé M. E. (1985) What is conservation biology?. Bioscience 35:727–734

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stephens P. H. G. (2000) Nature, Purity, Ontology. Environmental Values 9:267–294

    Google Scholar 

  • Stephens P. H. G. (2004) Nature and Human Liberty. Organization & Environment 17:76–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stockwell C. A., Hendry A. P., Kinnison M. T. (2003) Contemporary Evolution Meets Conservation Biology. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 18:94–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Takacs D. (1996) The Idea of Biodiversity: Philosophies of Paradise. Baltimore, The Johns Hopkins University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor B. (1999) Green Apocalypticism: Understanding Disaster in the Radical Environmental Worldview. Society & Natural Resources 12:377–386

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner J. (1996) The Abstract Wild. Tucson, The University of Arizona Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner J. (2001) The Wild and its New Enemies. In: Kerasote T. (ed.) Return of the Wild: The Future of Our National Lands. Washington, DC, Island Press, pp. 119–35

    Google Scholar 

  • Tybirk K., Alrøe H. F., Frederiksen P. (2004) Nature Quality in Organic Farming: A Conceptual Analysis of Considerations and Criteria in a European Context. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 17:249–274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verhoog H., Matze M., Van Beuren E. L., Baars T. (2003) The Role of the Concept of the Natural (Naturalness) in Organic Farming. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 16:29–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wallington T. J., Moore S. A. (2005) Ecology, Values, and Objectivity: Advancing the Debate. BioScience 55:873–878

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weston A. (1992) Toward Better Problems: New Perspectives on Abortion, Animal Rights, the Environment, and Justice. Philadelphia, Temple University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodward C. (2002) In Ruins. London, Vintage

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Geography and Environmental Studies, University of Tasmania, Private Bag 78, Hobart, Tasmania, 7001, Australia

    Ben Ridder

Authors
  1. Ben Ridder
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ben Ridder.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ridder, B. An Exploration of the Value of Naturalness and Wild Nature. J Agric Environ Ethics 20, 195–213 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10806-006-9025-6

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10806-006-9025-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation