Skip to main content
Log in

Proof of a retroactive influence

  • Published:
Foundations of Physics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Quantum theory predicts that, e.g., in a Stern-Gerlach experiment with electrons the measured spin component\(S_Z = \pm \frac{1}{2}\) does not come about by an adjustment at the last moment, a forced “flipping” or “tilting” of the spin (vector), which would imply z-angular momentum exchange between particle and instrument, but will afterward appear to have had the value\(\frac{1}{2} or - \frac{1}{2}\) already before the measurement. Because an electron spin cannot have components\( \pm \frac{1}{2}\) in all directions at the same time, the measuring direction has a “privileged” status before the measurement, however we choose that direction, which implies a retroactive effect. A second proof of retroactivity is derived from a special case of the paradox of Einstein, Podolsky, and Rosen. It is strongly suggested by our result that, in essential respects, both Bohr and Einstein were right in their famous controversy about determinism and considering microprocesses “as a whole.”

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. J. S. Bell,Physics 1(3), 195–200 (1964).

    Google Scholar 

  2. D. Bohm and Y. Aharonov,Phys. Rev. 108(4), 1070–76 (1957).

    Google Scholar 

  3. G. Joos,Lehrbuch der theoretischen Physik (Geest & Portig, Leipzig, 1959), p. 621.

    Google Scholar 

  4. C. W. Rietdijk,Phil. Sci. 33(4), 341–4(1966).

    Google Scholar 

  5. C. W. Rietdijk,Phil. Sci. 43(4), 598–609 (1976).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rietdijk, C.W. Proof of a retroactive influence. Found Phys 8, 615–628 (1978). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00717585

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00717585

Keywords

Navigation