Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-m9kch Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-31T12:24:15.528Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

How standardized must a code be to be useful?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 October 2023

Andrew M. Riggsby Open the ORCID record for Andrew M. Riggsby [Opens in a new window]
Andrew M. Riggsby*
Affiliation:
Department of Classics, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA ariggsby@mail.utexas.edu; https://utexas.academia.edu/AndrewRiggsby
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

If, as it appears, failure of standardization blocks the rise of general-purpose ideography, then a more precise characterization of “standardization” should help illuminate aspects of the process. Comparison is made with several histories of standardization to outline relevant dimensions and thresholds. This line of inquiry is particularly important for the forward-looking question of whether such ideography can ever arise.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 46 , 2023 , e251
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bogacz, B., Gertz, M., & Mara, H. (2015). Cuneiform character similarity using graph representations. In Wohlhart, P. & Lepetit, V. (Eds.), 20th computer vision winter workshop (pp. 1–8). Universitätsbibliothek Heidelberg.Google Scholar
Bogacz, B., & Mara, H. (2022). Digital assyriology – Advances in visual cuneiform analysis. ACM Journal on Computing and Cultural Heritage, 15(2), article 38.Google Scholar
Boot, E. (2010a). Maya glyph blog 2010, No. 1: Chichen Itza. Retrieved January 15, 2023, from http://maya-glyph-blog.blogspot.com/2010/05/maya-glyph-blog-2010-no.htmlGoogle Scholar
Boot, E. (2010b). Maya glyph blog 2010, No. 2: Xcalumkin. Retrieved January 15, 2023, from http://maya-glyph-blog.blogspot.com/2010/07/?m=0Google Scholar
Boot, E. (2010c). Maya glyph blog 2010, No. 3: Tikal. Retrieved January 15, 2023, from http://maya-glyph-blog.blogspot.com/2010/09/maya-glyph-blog-2010-no.htmlGoogle Scholar
Chambers, J. K., & Trudgill, P. (1998). Dialectology (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cronon, W. (1991). Nature's metropolis: Chicago and the great west. W. W. Norton. Kindle edition.Google Scholar
Cuneiform Digital Library Initiative. (2016). Sign lists. Retrieved January 16, 2023, from https://cdli.ox.ac.uk/wiki/sign_listsGoogle Scholar
Delnero, P. (2010). Sumerian extract tables and scribal education. Journal of Cuneiform Studies, 62, 53–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gear, D., & Gear, J. (1992). Earth to heaven: The royal animal-shaped weights of the Burmese empires. Twinstar.Google Scholar
Houston, S. (1994). Literacy among the Precolumbian Maya: A comparative perspective. In Boone, E. & Mignolo, W. (Eds.), Writing without words: Alternative literacies in Mesoamerica and the Andes (pp. 27–49). Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Kettunen, H., & Helmke, C. (2020). Introduction to Maya hieroglyphs (17th revised ed.). Retrieved January 15, 2023, from https://wayeb.org//download/Kettunen_Helmke_2020_Introduction_to_Maya_Hieroglyphs_17th_ed.pdfGoogle Scholar
Luciani, F., & Lucchelli, T. (2016). Pondera exacta ad Castoris. Aquileia Nostra, 79, 122–147.Google Scholar
Michalowski, P. (2011). The correspondence of the Kings of Ur an epistolary history of an ancient Mesopotamian kingdom. Eisenbrauns.Google Scholar
Miton, H., & Morin, O. (2021). Graphic complexity in writing systems. Cognition, 2021, 104771.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mittermayer, C. (2006). Altbabylonische Zeichenliste der sumerisch-literarischen Texte. Academic Press/Vandenhoek & Ruprecht.Google Scholar
Olmer, F. (2001). Le anfore e le misure di capacità. In Corti, C. & Giordani, N. (Eds.), Pondera: pesi e misure nell'antichità (pp. 227–236). Museo di Bilancia.Google Scholar
Prager, C. (Ed.). (2014). Text database and dictionary of Classic Mayan, a working list of Maya Hieroglyphic signs and graphs. Retrieved January 15, 2023, from https://mayawoerterbuch.de/zeichenkatalog/Google Scholar
Riggsby, A. M. (2019). Mosaics of knowledge: Representing information in the Roman world. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schon, R. (2015). Weight sets: Identification and analysis. Cambridge Archaeological Journal, 25(2), 477–494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tedlock, D. (2010). 2000 years of Mayan literature. University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar