Skip to main content
Log in

Hidden in Plain View: Feminists Doing Engineering Ethics, Engineers Doing Feminist Ethics

  • Published:
Science and Engineering Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

How has engineering ethics addressed gender concerns to date? How have the ideas of feminist philosophers and feminist ethicists made their way into engineering ethics? What might an explicitly feminist engineering ethics look like? This paper reviews some major themes in feminist ethics and then considers three areas in which these themes have been taken up in engineering ethics to date. First, Caroline Whitbeck’s work in engineering ethics integrates considerations from her own earlier writings and those of other feminist philosophers, but does not use the feminist label. Second, efforts to incorporate the Ethic of Care and principles of Social Justice into engineering have drawn on feminist scholarship and principles, but these commitments can be lost in translation to the broader engineering community. Third, the film Henry’s Daughters brings gender considerations into the mainstream of engineering ethics, but does not draw on feminist ethics per se; despite the best intentions in broaching a difficult subject, the film unfortunately does more harm than good when it comes to sexual harassment education. I seek not only to make the case that engineers should pay attention to feminist ethics and engineering ethicists make more use of feminist ethics traditions in the field, but also to provide some avenues for how to approach integrating feminist ethics in engineering. The literature review and analysis of the three examples point to future work for further developing what might be called feminist engineering ethics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. While Mashburn and Martin argue that the field of feminist legal ethics is underdeveloped, the fact that they use the phrase “feminist legal ethics” in a book chapter reviewing that field demonstrates far greater development than in engineering.

  2. This is missing despite specific suggestions I and others made at an early screening of the film at the Association of Practical and Professional Ethics meeting in March 2010.

  3. While the study guide says Laura is 29, the voiceover in the film establishes that she is 11 years older than her sister who just graduated from college, identified in the study guide as 21.

References

  • Allgood, G. (2010). Everyone deserves clean water. Association for practical and professional ethics mini conference on engineering and social justice. March 6, 2010. http://www.onlineethics.org/23422.aspx. Accessed May 26, 2011.

  • Andrew, B. (2001). Angels, rubbish collectors, and pursuers of erotic joy: The image of the ethical woman. In P. DesAutels & J. Waugh (Eds.), Feminists doing ethics. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.

  • Baillie, C. (Ed.). (2006–2011). Synthesis lectures on engineers, technology and society. San Rafael, CA: Morgan and Claypool.

  • Bartky, S. L. (1995). Feeding egos and tending wounds: Deference and disaffection in women’s emotional labor. In M. Rogers (Ed.), Power, dignity and social structure: Readings in multicultural social theory. New York: McGraw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burton, B. K., & Dunn, C. P. (1996). Feminist ethics as moral grounding for stakeholder theory. Business Ethics Quarterly, 6(2), 133–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Canon, K. G. (1988). Black womanist ethics. Eugene, OR: Wipf and Stock.

    Google Scholar 

  • Card, C. (1995). Gender and moral luck [1990]. In V. Held (Ed.), Justice and care: Essential readings in feminism. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cockburn, C., & Dubravk, Z. (2002). The postwar moment: Militaries, masculinities and international peacekeeping. London: Lawrence and Wishart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cowan, R. S. (1992). Genetic technology and reproductive choice: An ethics for autonomy. In D. J. Kevles & L. Hood (Eds.), The code of codes: Scientific and social issues in the human genome project. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crenshaw, K. (1991). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review, 43(6), 1241–1299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Derry, R. (2002). Feminist theory and business ethics. In R. Frederick (Ed.), A companion to business ethics. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engineering Social Justice and Peace. (2010). Website. http://www.esjp.org. Accessed 15 October 2010.

  • Fleddermann, C. B. (1999). Engineering ethics. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilligan, C. (1982). In a different voice: Psychological theory and women’s development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harding, S., & Narayan, U. (1998). Border crossings: Multicultural and postcolonial feminist challenges to philosophy (part II). Hypatia, 13(3), 1–5. See entire special issue.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, C. E., Pritchard, M. S., & Rabins, M. J. (2005). Engineering ethics: Concepts and cases (3rd ed.). Stamford, CT: Thomson Wadsworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Held, V. (Ed.). (1995). Justice and care: Essential readings in feminist ethics. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henry’s Daughters [video recording]. (2010). Paul Martin (director, writer, editor). PI: Jimmy Smith. Co-PIs: Joe Herkert, Michael Loui, William Marcy, and Steven Nichols. Lubbock, TX: National Institute for Engineering Ethics. More information, including study guide, available at http://www.niee.org/2009%20website/niee/niee%20htm/ProductsServices-HenrysDaughters.htm. Accessed 15 October 2010.

  • Holmes, H. B., & Purdy, L. M. (Eds.). (1992). Feminist perspectives in medical ethics. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • hooks, b. (1984). Feminist theory from margin to center. Boston, MA: South End Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hugman, R., & Smith, D. (Eds.). (1995). Ethical issues in social work. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaggar, A. (2009a). The philosophical challenges of global gender justice. Philosophical Topics, 37(2), 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaggar, A. (2009b). Transnational cycles of gendered vulnerability: A prologue to a theory of global gender justice. Philosophical Topics, 37(2), 33–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, D., & Wetmore, J. (2008). STS and ethics: Implications for engineering ethics. In E. Hackett, O. Amsterdamska, M. Lynch, & J. Wajcman (Eds.), New handbook of science and technology studies. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kardon, J. (2005). Concept of “Care” in engineering. Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, 19(3), 256–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karnani, A. G. (2007). The mirage of marketing to the bottom of the pyramid. California Management Review, 49(4), 90–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kittay, E. (2009) The moral harm of migrant carework: Realizing a global right to care. Philosophical Topics, 37(2), 53–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koehn, D. (1998). Rethinking feminist ethics: Care, trust, and empathy. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larson, A. L., & Freeman, R. E. (1997). Women’s studies and business ethics. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loui, M. C., Smith, J. H., Herkert, J. R., & Nichols, S. P. (2010). Special session—Henry’s daughters: A new engineering ethics movie. In Proceedings of the 40th ASEE/IEEE frontiers in education conference, October 27–30, 2010, Washington, DC. http://fie-conference.org/fie2010/papers/1134.pdf. Accessed August 17, 2011.

  • MacKinnon, K. (1979). Sexual harassment of working women. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, M. W., & Schinzinger, R. (1996). Ethics in engineering (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mashburn, A. R., & Martin, J. T. (1999). The three faces of eve: Difference, dominance and beyond. In B. W. Taylor, S. Rush, & R. J. Munro (Eds.), Feminist jurisprudence, women and the law: Critical essays, research agenda, and bibliography. Littleton, CO: Rothman.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGregor, S. (2006). Pumping out the profits. Embassy, March 29, 2006. http://www.embassymag.ca/page/view/.2006.march.29.africapump. Accessed May 26, 2011.

  • Narayan, U. (1995). Colonialism and its others: Considerations on rights and care discourses. Hypatia, 10(2), 133–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Narayan, U., & Harding, S. (1998). Border crossings: Multicultural and postcolonial feminist challenges to philosophy (part I). Hypatia, 13(2), 1–6. See entire special issue.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, H. L. (2001). Identity and free agency. In P. DesAutels & J. Waugh (Eds.), Feminists doing ethics. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noddings, N. (1984). Caring: A feminine approach to ethics and moral education. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Okin, S. (1989). Justice, gender, and the family. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pantazidou, M., & Nair, I. (1999). Ethic of care: Guiding principles for engineering teaching and practice. Journal of Engineering Education, 88, 205–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parks, J. A. (1999). Ethical androcentrism and maternal substance addiction. International Journal of Applied Philosophy, 13(2), 165–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riley, D. M. (2008). Ethics in context, ethics in action: Getting beyond the individual professional in engineering ethics education. ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings, June 22–25, Pittsburgh: PA.

  • Riley, D.M., Ellis, G., & Howe, H. (2004). “To move people from apathy”: A multi-perspective approach to ethics across the engineering curriculum. ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings, June 21–24, Salt Lake City: UT.

  • Riley, D. M., Claris, L., & Ngambeki, I. (2006). The ethics blog: Students making connections among ethics, thermodynamics, and life. ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings, June 18–21, Chicago: IL.

  • Riley, D., Pawley, A. L., Tucker, J., & Catalano, G. D. (2009). Feminisms in engineering education: Transformative possibilities. National Women's Studies Association Journal, 21(2), 21–40.

  • Seymour, E. (1995). The loss of women from science, mathematics, and engineering undergraduate majors: An explanatory account. Science Education, 79(4), 437–473.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sexual Harassment Support. (2010). Effects of sexual harassment. http://www.sexualharassmentsupport.org/effects.html. Accessed 15 October 2010.

  • Subramaniam, B. (2001). The aliens have landed! Reflections on the rhetoric of biological invasions. Meridians: Feminism, Race, Transnationalism, 2, 26–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, B. W., Rush, S., & Munro, R. J. (1999). Feminist Jurisprudence, women, and the law: Critical essays, research agenda, and bibliography. Buffalo: Fred B. Rothman & Co.

  • Tong, R. (1983). Women, sex, and the law. Totowa, NJ: Rowman and Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tonso, K. L. (1996). The impact of cultural norms of women. Journal of Engineering Education, 85, 217–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tonso, K. L. (2007). On the outskirts of engineering: Learning identity, gender, and power via engineering practice. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tronto, J. C. (1987). Beyond gender difference to a theory of care. Signs, 12(4), 644–663.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tronto, J. (1993). Moral boundaries: A political argument for an ethic of care. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tronto, J. (2001). Does managing professionals affect professional ethics? Competence, autonomy, and care. In P. DesAutels & J. Waugh (Eds.), Feminists doing ethics. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vesilind, A. (2010). Engineering peace and justice: The responsibility of engineers to society. New York: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Vesilind, A., & Gunn, A. (1998). Engineering, ethics, and the environment. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vidhu, V. (2004). Engendering development: Limits of feminist theories of justice. Economic and Political Weekly, 29(49), 5246–5252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wacjman, J. (1991). Feminism confronts technology. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, M. U. (1989). Moral understandings: Alternative “Epistemology” for a feminist ethics. Hypatia, 4(2), 15–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warren, K. (2000). Ecofeminist philosophy: A western perspective on what it is and why it matters. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weston, G., & Aubry, J. (1990). Montreal’s mass killer marc Lépine’s hatred fed on failure, The Toronto Star, February 8, 1990, p. A18.

  • Whitbeck, C. (1983). Afterword to The maternal instinct (1982). In J. Treblicot (Ed.), Mothering: Essays in feminist theory. Totowa, NJ: Rowman & Allanheld.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitbeck, C. (1995). Teaching ethics to scientists and engineers: Moral agents and moral problems. Science and Engineering Ethics, 1(3), 299–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitbeck, C. (1998). Ethics in engineering practice and research. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wicks, A. C., Gilbert, D. R., & Freeman, R. E. (1994). A feminist reinterpretation of the stakeholder concept. Business Ethics Quarterly, 4, 475–497.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young, I. M. (1990). Justice and the politics of difference. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The author thanks participants in the DePauw Mellon workshop on Feminist Ethics, particularly Meryl Altman and Jana Sawicki for their helpful comments on drafts of this work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Donna Riley.

Additional information

I intend the phrase “feminist engineering ethics” to represent a variety of feminist approaches to engineering ethics and engineers’ approaches to feminist ethics. Walker (1989) among others has cautioned us against singular approaches to feminist ethics that re-establish hegemonic systems of thought. Here I focus on what engineers can learn from feminist ethics rather than the converse. Though there is likely a case to be made that feminist ethicists may have something to learn from engineers, as an engineer I hesitate to speculate in any detail about these synergies until a conversation between feminist ethicists and engineers has progressed further.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Riley, D. Hidden in Plain View: Feminists Doing Engineering Ethics, Engineers Doing Feminist Ethics. Sci Eng Ethics 19, 189–206 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-011-9320-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-011-9320-0

Keywords

Navigation