Skip to main content
Log in

Production Hydrobiology in the USSR Under the Pressure of Lysenkoism: Vladimir I. Zhadin’s Forgotten Theory of Biological Productivity (1940)

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Journal of the History of Biology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The present study analyzes specific traits of Lysenkoism dogmas as they were reflected in Soviet hydrobiology. As a case study, I use the now-forgotten productivity theory of bodies of water developed in 1940 by the Soviet hydrobiologist Vladimir I. Zhadin (1896–1974). Zhadin’s views on production relied on his observations of changes in the communities of riverine faunas caused by the construction of water reservoirs. The theory is of particular interest because it attempts to address the unresolved problems of that period. Some of these unsettled problems provided the foundation for the ideological debates during the dialectization period in Soviet biology of the early 1920s to mid-1930s and were influenced by Lysenkoism. Zhadin’s theory thus serves as a suitable model for identifying cognitive and ideological components in science and for the analysis of the influence of ideology on science. The analysis of Zhadin’s works shows that an attempt to separate ideologically imposed perceptions and the author’s own scientific views presents a challenging task. This can be explained by a highly efficient behavioral pattern of “protective coloration” employed by the scientist and by Zhadin’s sincere acceptance of some Lysenkoist ideas. Furthermore, I argue that the system of Lysenkoist dogmas concerning the association between an organism and its environment are in fact entirely sensible scientific principles which were taken to an extreme. The results of the study suggest a need for more careful and deeper evaluation of scientific works published during the period of the personality cult in the USSR. The “Lysenko affair” in branches of biology other than genetics is more complicated and needs further examination.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Dialectization refers to the introduction of Marxist ideology (primarily of the dialectical style of thinking) into biology.

  2. See a series of publications by Egerton on the history of various aspects of ecology in the world (2014, 2016, 2017) and also Elster (1974), Talling (2008).

  3. These words by Stalin have long been used as an epigraph to many scientific books and articles.

  4. VASKhNIL is the standard abbreviation for the V. I. Lenin All-Union Academy of Agricultural Sciences.

  5. See, for instance, the classical works of Victor Hensen and Karl Mobius and the studies of the mid-twentieth century (Bocking 1990; Nyhart 1998).

  6. The middle letter in Russian names designates a patronymic, i.e., Ivanovich is a son of Ivan.

  7. This is apparently an erratum due to a mistransliteration of the patronymic and surname.

  8. Collection 5 (not processed), Scientific Archive of the Zoological Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences, St. Petersburg, Russian Federation (hereafter cited as Col. 5, SA ZIN RAS).

  9. This and all subsequent biographical information about Zhadin are from Zhadin (1991).

  10. Col. 5, SA ZIN RAS.

  11. Col. 5, SA ZIN RAS.

  12. Col. 5, SA ZIN RAS.

  13. Col. 5, SA ZIN RAS.

  14. Apparently, he meant primarily the law of transformation of quantity into quality.

  15. Col. 5, SA ZIN RAS.

  16. For instance, the deep areas of Lake Baikal contain ancient fauna, while the inlets (the so-called sors) are inhabited by organisms of a more recent origin.

  17. The creation of tree belts was one of the essential elements of Stalin’s plan for transformation of nature (see Brain 2010).

  18. Col. 5, SA ZIN RAS.

  19. Col. 5, SA ZIN RAS.

  20. Col. 5, SA ZIN RAS.

  21. Zhadin did, however, participate in the conference itself.

  22. For more detailed information on Zhadin’s “naturalistic” way of thinking, see my interview with Alimov (Rizhinashvili 2017a).

  23. Stankov was a fairly well-known fighter against Lysenkoism; see, for example, his brief biography on the official site of the Moscow State University: http://herba.msu.ru/botanists/stankov/ (accessed 8 July 2018).

  24. Consider, for example, the close relationship between science and practice in ecology and aquatic ecology (Schwarz and Jax 2011).

  25. For example, this happened with the Czech entomologist and endocrinologist V. Novak; see Hampl (2016).

References

  • Alimov, Alexander F. 2003. Towards a Theory of the Functioning of Aquatic Ecosystems. Leiden: Backhuys Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anonymous. 1934. Diskussia: Osnovnye Ustanovki i Puti Razvitia Sovetskoj Ekologii [Discussion: The Basic Principles and Pathways of the Development of Soviet Ecology]. Sovetskaya Botanika 3: 3–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Behning, Arvid L. 1925. 3-j Mezhdunarodnyj s’ezd Limnologov [The Third Limnological Congress]. Russkij Hydrobiologicheskij Zhurnal 4: 218–220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bocking, Stephen. 1990. Fisheries and Fundamental Science: Donald Rawson’s Studies of Lake Productivity. Scientia Canadensis 14: 38–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bocking, Stephen. 2013. The Ecosystem: Research and Practice in North America. Web Ecology 13: 43–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brain, Stephen. 2010. The Great Stalin Plan for the Transformation of Nature. Environmental History 15: 670–700.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Breyfogle, Nicholas B. 2018. Toward an Environmental History of Tsarist Russia and the Soviet Union. In Eurasian Environments: Nature and Ecology in Imperial Russian and Soviet History, ed. Nicholas B. Breyfogle, 3–20. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Brodskiy, Konstantin A. 1934. Problema Produktivnosti Vodoemov (Bentos) [The Problem of Productivity of the Water Bodies (The Benthos)]. Bulletin of the Far Eastern Branch of the Academy of Sciences of the USSR 10: 31–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brotzky, Vera A., and Lev A. Zenkevich. 1936. Biologicheskaya Produktivnost` Morskikh Vodoemov [Biological Productivity of Sea Waters]. Zoologicheskij Zhurnal 15: 13–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Egerton, Frank N. 2014. History of Ecological Sciences, Part 50: Formalizing Limnology, 1870s to 1920s. Bulletin of the Ecological Society of America 95: 131–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Egerton, Frank N. 2016. History of Ecological Sciences, Part 57: Aspects of Limnology in America, 1930s to about 1990, Led by Hutchinson and Hasler. Bulletin of the Ecological Society of America 97: 228–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Egerton, Frank N. 2017. History of Ecological Sciences, Part 59: Niches, Biomes, Ecosystems, and Systems. Bulletin of the Ecological Society of America 98: 298–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elster, Hans-Joachim. 1974. History of Limnology. Mitteilungen Internationale Vereinigung für Theoretische und Angewandte Limnologie 20: 7–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordin, Michael D. 2017. The Problem with Pseudoscience. EMBO Reports 18: 1482–1485.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graham, Loren. 1987. Science, Philosophy, and Human Behavior in the Soviet Union. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham, Loren. 2016. Lysenko’s Ghost: Epigenetics and Russia. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gurianova, Evpraksiya. 1968. Vladimir Ivanovich Zhadin. In Zagryaznenie i Samoochishhenie reki Nevy` [Pollution and Self-Purification of River Neva], 3–23. Leningrad: Nauka.

  • Hampl, Peter. 2016. The Evolution of Theoretical Views of Vladimir Novak: From Lysenkoism to Epigenetics. Studies in the History of Biology 8: 11–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hubbard, Jennifer. 2014. In the Wake of Politics: The Political and Economic Construction of Fisheries Biology, 1860–1970. Isis 105: 364–378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ivlev, Viktor S. 1945. Biologicheskaya Produktivnost` Vodoemov [Biological Productivity of Water Bodies]. Uspekhi Sovremennoj Biologii 19: 98–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karzinkin, Georgiy S. 1936. Teoriya Biologicheskoj Produktivnosti Vodoemov kak Rabochaya Skhema [The Theory of Biological Productivity of Water Bodies as a Working Scheme]. Zoologicheskij Zhurnal 15: 245–250.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karzinkin, Georgiy S. 1952. Osnovy Biologicheskoj Produktivnosti Vodoemov [The Basics of Biological Productivity of the Water Bodies]. Moscow: Pishchepromisdat.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kashkarov, Daniil N. 1937. Sovetskaya Zooekologiya, ee Sostoyanie, Uspekhi za 20 Let i Perspektivy` Razvitiya [Soviet Zooecology, Its Condition, Achievements over 20 Years and Perspectives of the Development]. Priroda 10: 212–229.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolchinsky, Eduard I. 1999. V Poiskah Sovetskogo “Soyuza” Filosofii i Biologii (Diskussii i Repressii v 20-h — Nachale 30-h gg.) [In Search of the Soviet “Union” Between Philosophy and Biology (The Discussions and the Repressions in the 1920s–the Early 1930s)]. St. Petersburg: Dmitriy Bulanin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolchinsky, Eduard I. 2014. Edinstvo Evolyucionnoj Teorii v Razdelennom Mire XX Veka [The Unity of Evolutionary Theory in Divided World of the 20th Century]. St. Petersburg: Nestor-Historia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolchinsky, Eduard I. 2017. Current Attempts at Exonerating “Lysenkoism” and Their Causes. In The Lysenko Controversy as a Global Phenomenon, vol. 2, ed. William de Jong-Lambert and Nikolai Krementsov, 207–236. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Krementsov, Nikolai, and William de Jong-Lambert. 2017. “Lysenkoism” Redux: Introduction. In The Lysenko Controversy as a Global Phenomenon, vol. 1, ed. William de Jong-Lambert and Nikolai Krementsov, 1–34. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lebedintsev, Arseniy A. 1908. Popy`tka Opredelit` Zapasy` Ry`by` v Ozere po ego Kislorodnomu Balansu [An Attempt to Determine the Fish Reserve in a Lake by its Oxygen Balance]. Iz Nikol`skogo Ry`bovodnogo Zavoda 11: 81–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levit, Georgy S. 2011. Looking at Russian Ecology through the Biosphere Theory. In Ecology Revisited: Reflecting on Concepts, Advancing Science, ed. Astrid Schwarz and Kurt Jax, 333–347. Dordrecht, Heidelberg, London, New York, NY: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Lindeman, Raymond L. 1942. The Trophic-Dynamic Aspect of Ecology. Ecology 23: 399–418.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lysenko, Trofim D. 1949. Estestvenny`j Otbor i Vnutrividovaya Konkurenciya [The Natural Selection and Within-Species Competition]. Moscow: Sel’khozgiz.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lysenko, Trofim D. 1952. Agrobiologiya [Agrobiology]. Moscow: OGIZ–Sel`khozgiz.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marks, John. 2017. Lessons from Lysenko. In The Lysenko Controversy as a Global Phenomenon, vol. 2, ed. William de Jong-Lambert and Nikolai Krementsov, 185–206. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Mirzoyan, Eduard N. 2013. Stanovlenie Ekologicheskih Koncepcij v SSSR: Sem Vydayushihsya Teorij (D.N. Kashkarov, V.V. Stanchinskij, S.A. Severcov, V.N. Beklemishev, L.G. Ramenskij, R.F. Gekker, L.S. Berg) [The Formation of Ecological Concepts in the USSR: Seven Outstanding Theories (D.N. Kashkarov, V.V. Stanchinskiy, S.A. Severtsov, V.N. Beklemishev, L.G. Ramenskiy, R.F. Gekker, L.S. Berg)]. Moscow: Book House Librokom.

  • Muraveiskiy, Sergey D. 1936. Puti Postroeniya Teorii Biologicheskoj Produktivnosti Vodoemov [The Paths to Construct the Theory of Biological Productivity of Water Bodies]. Zoologicheskij Zhurnal 15: 563–584.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neizvestnova-Zhadina, Ekaterina S. 1937. Raspredelenie i Sezonnaya Dinamika Biocenozov Rechnogo Rusla i Metody` ikh Izucheniya [Distribution and Seasonal Dynamics of Riverine Biocoenoses and Methods of Their Study]. Izvestiya AN SSSR (Otdelenie Matematicheskikh i Estestvenny`kh Nauk) 4: 1246–1267.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nyhart, Lynn. 1998. Civic and Economic Zoology in Nineteenth-Century Germany: The Living Communities of Karl Möbius. Isis 89: 605–630.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oldfield, Jonathan, and Denis J.B. Shaw. 2016. The Development of Russian Environmental Thought: Scientific and Geographical Perspectives on the Natural Environment. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pavlovskiy, Evgeniy N. (ed.). 1953. Trudy` Vsesoyuznoj Konferencii po Voprosam Ry`bnogo Khozyajstva [Proceedings of the All-Union Conference on the Problems of Fishery Industry]. Moscow: Publishing House of the USSR Academy of Sciences.

  • Prezent, Isay I. 1948. V Sodruzhestve s Prirodoj (I.V. Michurin i Ego Uchenie) [In Cooperation with Nature (Ivan V. Michurin and His Doctrine)]. Moscow, Leningrad: OGIZ–Sel`khozgiz.

    Google Scholar 

  • Protasov, Alexander A. 2008. River and Lake Continua: An Attempt at Analysis and Synthesis. Inland Water Biology 1: 105–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rizhinashvili, Alexandra L. 2017a. Vladimir Ivanovich Zhadin (1896-1974) i Istoki Sovremennoj Gidrobiologii: Interv’yu s Akademikom RAN A.F. Alimovym [Prof. Vladimir I. Zhadin (1896-1974) and the Origins of Modern Hydrobiology: An Interview with Academician of the Russian Academy of Sciences Alexandr F. Alimov]. Studies in the History of Biology 9: 84–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rizhinashvili, Alexandra L. 2017b. V.I. Zhadin v Zaluch’e: Nekotorye Dokumenty ob Ideyah Razvitiya Teorii Biologicheskoj Produktivnosti Vodoemov [Vladimir I. Zhadin at Zaluchie: Some Documents on the Development of the Theory of Biological Productivity of Water Bodies]. Studies in the History of Biology 9: 48–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roll-Hansen, Nils. 2005. The Lysenko Effect: Undermining the Autonomy of Science. Endeavour 29: 143–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roll-Hansen, Nils. 2008. Wishful Science: The Persistence of T. D. Lysenko’s Agrobiology in the Politics of Science. Osiris 23: 166–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rossianov, Kirill O. 1993. Editing Nature: Joseph Stalin and the “New” Soviet Biology. Isis 84: 728–745.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rossolimo, Leonid L. 1934. Zadachi i Ustanovki Limnologii kak Nauki [The Problems and Attitudes of the Limnology as a Science]. Trudy` Limnologicheskoj Stancii v Kosine 17: 5–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwarz, Astrid, and Kurt Jax. 2011. Early Ecology in the German-Speaking World Through WWII. In Ecology Revisited: Reflecting on Concepts, Advancing Science, ed. Astrid Schwarz and Kurt Jax, 231–275. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, Denis J.B., and Jonathan Oldfield. 2008. Totalitarianism and Geography: L.S. Berg and the Defence of an Academic Discipline in the Age of Stalin. Political Geography 27: 96–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skadovsky, Sergey N. 1937. Voprosy` Fiziologii Prisposoblyaemosti Vodny`kh Zhivotny`kh s Tochki Zreniya Problemy` Produktivnosti [Problems of the Adaptation Physiology in Aquatic Animals, Viewed From the Standpoint of the Productivity Problem]. Zoologicheskij Zhurnal 16: 7–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skadovsky, Sergey N. 1955. Ekologicheskaya Fisiologiya Vodny`kh Organismov [Ecological Physiology of Aquatic Organisms]. Moscow: Sovetskaya Nauka.

    Google Scholar 

  • Talling, Jack F. 2008. The Developmental History of Inland-Water Science. Freshwater Reviews 1: 119–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tauger, Mark B. 1991. The 1932 Harvest and the Famine of 1933. Slavic Review 50: 70–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, Peter J. 1988. Technocratic Optimism, H.T. Odum, and the Partial Transformation of Ecological Metaphor after World War II. Journal of the History of Biology 21: 213–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van der Valk, Arnold G. 2014. From Formation to Ecosystem: Tansley’s Response to Clements’ Climax. Journal of the History of Biology 47: 293–321.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vannote, Robin L., G. Wyne Minchall, Kenneth W. Cummins, James R. Sedell, and Colbert E. Cushing. 1980. The River Continuum Concept. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 37: 130–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vinberg, Georgiy. 1936. Nekotory`e Obshhie Voprosy` Produktivnosti Ozer [Some General Problems Concerning the Productivity of Lakes]. Zoologicheskij Zhurnal 15: 587–602.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vodyanitskiy, Vladimir A. 1945. O Biologicheskoj Produktivnosti Vodoemov (po Povodu Teorii V.I. Zhadina) [On the Biological Productivity of Water Bodies (On the Theory of Vladimir I. Zhadin)]. Zoologicheskij Zhurnal 24: 69–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vorontsov, Nikolay N. 1992. Nature Protection and Government in the USSR. Journal of the History of Biology 25: 369–383.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weiner, Douglas R. 1988. Models of Nature. Ecology, Conservation and Cultural Revolution in Soviet Russia. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiner, Douglas R. 2002. A Little Corner of Freedom: Russian Nature Protection from Stalin to Gorbachev. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Worster, Donald. 1977. Nature’s Economy. The Roots of Ecology. San Francisco, CA: Sierra Club Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zaika, Viktor E. 2002. V.A. Vodyanickij i Vsesoyuznaya Diskussiya 1951 g. o Biologicheskoj Produktivnosti Vodoemov [Vladimir A. Vodyanitskiy and All-Union Discussion on Biological Productivity of Water Bodies in 1951]. Ekologiya Morya 62: 86–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhadin, Vladimir I. 1934. Biozenoticheskie i Faunisticheskie Issledovaniya Rayonov i Ikh Biotopov v Svyazi s Khozyaystvennymi Rabotami, Izmenyaushchimi Usloviya Sushchestvovaniya Vodnykh Zhivotnykh [A Biocoenotic and Faunistic Study of Regions and Their Biotopes in Connection with Economic Operations that Change the Living Conditions of Aquatic Organisms]. In Trudy Faunisticheskoy Konferenzii Zoologicheskogo Instituta AN SSSR 3-8 Fevralya 1932 g. (Sekziya Gydrobiologicheskaya) [Proceedings of the Faunistic Conference of the Zoological Institute of the AS USSR, 3-8 February 1932 (Hydrobiological Session)], 33-39. Leningrad: Publishing House of the Academy of Sciences of the USSR.

  • Zhadin, Vladimir I. 1940. Fauna Rek i Vodoxranilishh (Problema Perestrojki Fauny` Rek SSSR v Svyazi s Stroitel`stvom Gidrotexnicheskix Sooruzhenij) [The Fauna of Rivers and Water Reservoirs (The Problem of Reconstruction of the Fauna of Rivers under the Influence of Hydrotechnical Buildings)]. Moscow, Leningrad: Publishing House of the USSR Academy of Sciences.

  • Zhadin, Vladimir I. 1946a. Eroziya Pochv kak Gidrobiologicheskij Factor [Soil Erosion as a Hydrobiological Factor]. Priroda 9: 25–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhadin, Vladimir I. 1946b. Problema Genezisa Fauny` i Biocenozov Kontinental`ny`kh Vodoemov SSSR v Chetvertom Pyatiletnem Plane [The Problem of the Genesis of the Fauna and Biocoenoses of Inland Waters of USSR in Fourth Five-Year Plan]. Zoologicheskij Zhurnal 25: 385–394.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhadin, Vladimir I. 1947. Zakonomernosti Massovogo Razvitiya Zhizni v Vodoxranilishhakh [The Regularities of Mass Development of the Life in the Water Reservoirs]. Zoologicheskij Zhurnal 26: 403–414.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhadin, Vladimir I. 1949. Sovremennoe Sostoyanie i Zadachi Gidrobiologii v Svete Ucheniya Vil`yamsa — Michurina — Ly`senko [The Current State and Goals of Hydrobiology in Light of the Ideas of Williams — Michurin — Lysenko]. Zoologicheskij Zhurnal 28: 197–212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhadin, Vladimir I. 1991. Moj Put` v Gidrobiologii [My Path to Hydrobiology]. In Otechestvenny`e Gidrobiologi [The Hydrobiologists of Our Country], ed. Ludmila A. Kutikova, 5–79. Leningrad: Zoological Institute of the USSR Academy of Sciences.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

I express my sincere thanks to Elena P. Tikhonova (Zoological Institute of the RAS, St. Petersburg) for helping with my work in the archive fund of Vladimir I. Zhadin and to staff of the Scientific Library of the Zoological Institute of the RAS (especially to a head of the Library Dr. Evgenia S. Labina and to librarians Svetlana M. Pulkkinen, Anna A. Khalina, Yulia A. Dunaeva, Daria A. Gudkova). I am deeply grateful to Prof. Douglas R. Weiner (University of Arizona, Tucson, USA) for his comments on my manuscript and especially for his review of English text of the manuscript. I am indebted to translator Dr. Anatoliy A. Petrov (Zoological Institute of the RAS) for his great assistance. The work is supported by Russian Foundation for Basic Research (Project No. 17-33-01046-OГH).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alexandra Rizhinashvili.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rizhinashvili, A. Production Hydrobiology in the USSR Under the Pressure of Lysenkoism: Vladimir I. Zhadin’s Forgotten Theory of Biological Productivity (1940). J Hist Biol 53, 105–139 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10739-019-09590-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10739-019-09590-5

Keywords

Navigation