No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Matthew De Varis and the ΔΙΣΣΟΙΛ ΟΓΟΙ
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 11 February 2009
Extract
Two sixteenth-century manuscripts, Vat. 217 and 1338, each contain, as an appendix to the works of Sextus Empiricus, a small Sophistic treatise now usually referred to as the 
. The two appendices were first collated, it would seem, by Conrad Trieber, who planned to publish an edition of the treatise. He died, however, before the project was completed, and his notes passed into the possession of Wilamowitz, who allowed H. Mutschmann to consult them for purposes of writing his own article on Sextus.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © The Classical Association 1972
References
page 195 note 1 SeeMutschmann, H., ‘Die Überlieferung der Schriften des Sextus Empiricus’, Rhein. Mus. Ixiv (1909) 245, 277 n. 1.Google Scholar
page 195 note 2 Ibid.Ibid. 244 n. 1.
page 195 note 3 Ibid.Ibid. 244–5.
page 195 note 4 Ibid.Ibid. 245.
page 195 note 5 A pupil of Janus Lascaris, de Varis was a member of the Greek Academy in Rome. From 1542 to 1550 he edited Eustathius' Scholia on the Iliad, and in 1583 published a translation of the articles of the Council of Trent. He died some time before 1588, when a posthumous edition of his Liber de graecae linguae particulis was published by his nephew, Peter de Varis. For further informarung tion on his life see Kalitsounakis, I. E., “
”, 
xxvi (1914), 81–102.Google Scholar
page 195 note 6 Weber, E., 
: Eine Ausgabe der sogenannten Dialexeis, Philol.-hist. Beitr. C. Wachsmuth überr. (Leipzig, 1897), 33–51.Google Scholar
page 195 note 7 See the prefatory information to the 
in the third, fourth, and fifth editions of the Fragmente.
page 195 note 8 Kochalsky, A., De Sexti Empirici Adversus Logicos Libris Quaestiones Criticae (Marburg, 1911.Google Scholar
page 196 note 1 
., Versione et Notis Jo. North, in Gale, Thomas, Opuscula Mythologica Physica et Ethica (Cambridge, 1671), 47–76.Google Scholar
page 196 note 2 R. Porsoni Adversaria edd. Monk, J.H., Blomfield, C.J. (Cambridge, 1812), 303.Google Scholar
page 196 note 3 Orellius, C., Opuscula Graecorum Veterum Sententiosa et Moralia ii (Lipsiae, 1812), 644.Google Scholar
page 196 note 4 It is this scholar who is responsible for all changes in the text and notes of the second edition of North's 
(Amsterdam, 1688).Google Scholar
page 197 note 1 According to Weber (op. cit. 33), F. Blass had supplied him with the sketch of an edition of the 
that had been put together by him in 1881. The many Philoconjectures that Weber attributes to Blass
stem from this sketch and from later personal correspondence (ibid.)
page 197 note 2 3 Op. cit. ad loc. (the change is made in the text, without comment).
page 197 note 3 Op. cit. ad loc. (again a change the been text only).
page 197 note 4 Mullach, F. W. A., Fragmenta Philoconjectures sophorum Graecorum i (Paris, 1875), 550.Google Scholar
page 197 note 5 Stephanus, H., Diogenis Laerti de Vitis, etc. i (Paris, 1570), 479.Google Scholar
page 198 note 1 Op. cit., ad loc. (both in a note and in the text).
page 198 note 2 Schanz, W., ‘Zu den sogenannten Dialexeis’, Hermes xix (1884), 379.Google Scholar
page 198 note 3 Op. cit., ad loc. (in the text only).