Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-ttngx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-06T17:49:49.403Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Logic of Religious Language

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 November 2010

Extract

By ‘the logic of religious language’ I understand both a problem: What is the correct account of the logic of religious language? and a theme, a recurrent theme in the modern philosophical discussion of religion, which raises a related but distinguishable question: Is the approach to religion of linguistic analysis an adequate approach? Can we do justice to the logic of religious language by attending to the recognition and analysis of different linguistic forms?

Type
Papers
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Institute of Philosophy and the contributors 1968

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 1 note 1 Christian Apologetics (London, 1947), p. 50Google Scholar.

page 8 note 1 Matt. 7: ii; cf. i John 4: 20.

page 8 note 2 Matt. 18: 12.

page 9 note 1 Luke 15: 4.

page 9 note 2 The Language of Morals (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1952), p. 1Google Scholar.

page 11 note 1 The Language of Morals, p. 69.

page 15 note 1 The World and God (London, 1935), p. 6Google Scholar.

page 17 note 1 Ramsey, I. T. (ed.), Christian Ethics and Contemporary Philosophy (London, 1966), p. 61Google Scholar.

page 18 note 1 I would have to understand the meaning ofstatements in order to make the inference!

page 19 note 1 John 14: 6.

page 19 note 2 Op. cit., 5. 641.

page 19 note 3 Ibid., 4. 116.