Skip to main content
Log in

Self-conscious roots of human normativity

  • Published:
Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

What are the roots of human normativity and when do children begin to behave according to standards and norms? Empirical observations demonstrate that we are born with built-in (implicit and automatic) orientation toward what is predictable and of the same - henceforth what deviates from it -, what is the norm or the standard in the generic sense of the word. However, what develop in humans is self-consciousness, transforming norms from “should” to “ought” and making human normativity profoundly different from any other forms expressed in infancy, other animals, or any smart machines. Self-consciousness is the ability to objectify oneself through the evaluative eyes of others. It sets us apart as a species and is at the roots of human normativity. A developmental blueprint capturing the progressive co-emergence of self-consciousness and normativity in the human child is proposed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agnetta, B., & Rochat, P. (2004). Imitative games by 9-, 14-, and 18-month-old infants. Infancy, 6(1), 1–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bigelow, A., & Rochat, P. (2006). Two-month-old infants’ sensitivity to social sontingency in mother-infant and stanger-infant interaction. Infancy, 9(3), 313–325.

  • Broesch, T., Callaghan, T., Henrich, J., Murphy, C., & Rochat, P. (2011). Cultural variations in children’s mirror self-recognition. Journal of Cross Cultural Psychology, 40(6), 1019–1031.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruner, J. S. (1972). Nature and uses of immaturity. American Psychologist, 27(8), 687–708.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Callaghan, T., Rochat, P., Lillard, A., Claux, M. L., Odden, H., Itakura, S., Tapanya, S., & Singh, S. (2005). Synchrony in the onset of mental-state reasoning: evidence from five cultures. Psychological Science, 16(5), 378–384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chevallier, C., Molesworth, C, & Happé, F. (2012). Diminished Social Motivation Negatively Impacts Reputation Management: Autism Spectrum Disorders as a Case in Point. PLOS One, January.

  • Darwin, C. (1872/1965). The expression of the emotions in man and animals. Chicago: Chicago University.

  • Farroni, T., Massaccesi, S., Menon, E., & Johnson, M. H. (2007). Direct gaze modulates face recognition in young infants. Cognition, 102, 396–404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farroni, T., Menon, E., & Johnson, M. H. (2006). Factors influencing newborns preference for faces with eye contact. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 95, 298–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fehr, E., Bernhard, H., & Rockenbach, B. (2008). Egalitarianism in young children. Nature, 454, 1079–1084.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haith, M. M., Hazan, C., & Goodman, G. S. (1988). Expectation and anticipation of dynamic visual events by 3.5 month-old babies. Child Development, 59, 467–479.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hebb, D. O. (1949). The organization of behavior. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, W. (1890/1950). The Principles of Psychology. N.Y.: Dover Publishers.

  • Lizardo, O. (2013). Habitus. In K. Byron (Ed.), Encyclopedia of philosophy and the social sciences. London: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lecanuet, J.-P., Granier-Deferre, C., & Busnel, M.-C. (1988). Fetal cardiac and motor responses to octave-band noises as a function of central frequency, intensity and heartrate variability. Early Human Development, 18, 81–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marlier, L., Schaal, B., & Soussignan, R. (1998). Bottle-fed neonates prefer an odor experienced in utero to an odor experienced postnatally in the feeding context. Developmental Psychobiology, 33, 133–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morton, J., & Johnson, M. H. (1991). CONSPEC and CONLERN: a two-process theory of infant face recognition. Psychological Review, 98(2), 164–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olson, K. R., & Spelke, E. S. (2008). Foundations of cooperation in young children. Cognition, 108, 222–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robbins, E., & Rochat, P. (2011). Emerging signs of strong reciprocity in human ontogeny. Frontiers in Psychology, 2(353), 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rochat, P. (2009). Others in mind: Social origins of self-consciousness. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rochat, P. (2011). Possession and morality in early development. New Directions in Child and Adolescent Development.

  • Rochat, P. (2001). The infant’s world. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rochat, P. (2011b). What is it like to be a newborn? In S. Gallagher (Ed.), Oxford handbook of the self. Oxford/NewYork: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rochat, P., Broesch, T., & Jayne, K. (2012). Social awareness and early mirror self-recognition. Consciousness and Cognition.

  • Rochat, P., & Zahavi, D. (2011). The uncanny mirror: a re-framing of mirror self-experience. Cognition and Consciousness, 20, 204–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saffran, J., Aslin, R., & Newport, E. (1996). Statistical learning by 8-month-old infants. Science, 274(5294), 1926–1928.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tronick, E., Als, H., Adamson, L. B., Wise, S., & Brazelton, T. B. (1978a). The infant’s response to entrapment between contradictory messages in face to face interaction. Journal of the American Academy of Child Psychiatry, 17, 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stipek D, Recchia S, McClintic S, Lewis M (1992) Self-Evaluation in Young Children. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development 57.

  • Striano, T., & Rochat, P. (1999). Developmental link between dyadic and triadic social competence in infancy. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 17(4), 551–562.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Talwar, V., & Lee, K. (2002). Emergence of white-lie telling in children between 3 and 7 years of age. Merrill Palmer Quarterly, 48, 160–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Talwar, V., Murphy, S., & Lee, K. (2007). White lie-telling in children for politeness purposes. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 31, 1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu, F., Bao, X., Fu, G., Talwar, V., & Lee, K. (2010). Lying and truth telling in children: from concept to action. Child Development, 81, 581–596.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, C. (1989). Sources of the self: The making of modern identity. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomasello, M. (1999). Cultural origins of human cognition. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tronick, E., Als, H., Adamson, L. B., Wise, S., & Brazelton, T. B. (1978b). The infant’s response to entrapment between contradictory messages in face to face interaction. Journal of the American Academy of Child Psychiatry, 17, 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The current work was prepared while the author was a resident fellow at the Intitute of Advanced Studies (IEA) in Paris, France

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Philippe Rochat.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rochat, P. Self-conscious roots of human normativity. Phenom Cogn Sci 14, 741–753 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-015-9427-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-015-9427-x

Keywords

Navigation