Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-jr42d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T00:22:14.877Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Navigating Frames of Address: María Lugones on Language, Bodies, Things, and Places

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2020

Abstract

Address figures prominently in contemporary (Latina) feminism, yet calls for further theorizing. Modes of address are forms of signification we direct at people, objects, and places, and they at us. Address constitutes a vital dimension of our corporeal interactions with persons and the material world. Our relationships are in motion as we adopt modes of address toward one another or fail to do so. Clarifying address through examples from Gloria Anzaldúa, this essay reveals its importance in María Lugones's writings. The essay thereby highlights underexplored aspects of Lugones's texts, identifies continuities between Lugones's philosophy and (Latina) feminist work that comprehends address as a carrier of aesthetic and political meanings, and illuminates the resources of a remarkably fruitful concept. Address, in Lugones, is the centerpiece of a quotidian cultural politics. Principal concepts she introduces (concerning subjectivity, critique and transformation, social categorization and interaction, the role of language, bodies, objects, and places) recruit address. Yet, by foregrounding address, the essay also brings into view unforeseen obstructions in the paths of address that Lugones champions, and an enlarged playing field that we can activate to realize desirable frames of address and derail objectionable structures. Avenues open up for further development of Lugones's insights and for inquiries into address.

Type
Cluster on Latina Feminism
Copyright
Copyright © 2016 by Hypatia, Inc.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anzaldúa, Gloria. 1987. Borderlands/La frontera: The new mestiza. San Francisco: Spinsters/Aunt Lute.Google Scholar
Johnson, Barbara. 1987. A world of difference. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Lugones, María. 2003. Pilgrimages/Peregrinajes: Theorizing coalition against multiple oppressions. Lanham, Md.: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Lugones, María. 2006. On complex communication. Hypatia 21 (3): 7585.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lugones, María. 2007. Heterosexualism and colonial/modern gender system. Hypatia 22 (1): 186209.Google Scholar
Lugones, María. 2010. Toward a decolonial feminism. Hypatia 25 (4): 742–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martinez, Jacqueline M. 2014. Culture, communication, and Latina feminist philosophy: Toward a critical phenomenology of culture. Hypatia 29 (1): 221–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roelofs, Monique. 2014. The cultural promise of the aesthetic. New York: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Roelofs, Monique. 2015. Kantian mouthliness: Enlightenment, address, aesthetics. Differences 26 (2): 2960.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spivak, Gayatri Chakravorti. 1993. On the politics of translation. In Outside in the teaching machine. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar