Skip to main content
Log in

Permanent Group Membership

  • Long Article
  • Published:
Biological Theory Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article is divided into two main sections. The first discusses “Female Inheritance and the Male Retention Hypothesis.” Permanent groups (groups with no inherent limit on group longevity) exist in several species because over generations members share important interests. Considering the association between cooperation and degree of relatedness, it seems to follow that a collective interest is more likely to be achieved when members show a higher degree of relatedness. I argue that if membership is inherited by only one sex, and this is the female sex, this results in a higher degree of relatedness between group members than when membership is inherited by both sexes, or by males only. Indeed, this is found in the overwhelming majority of species of insects, fish, birds, and mammals living in permanent groups. The (few) exceptions to the rule are briefly discussed. Humans are of special interest because human preindustrial societies tend to show either male or female inheritance. The second section asks, “Do Moralizing Gods Raise Paternity Confidence?” Since males inherit valuable membership in patrilocal/lineal societies, they are expected to be more concerned about the probability of paternity than males in matrilocal/lineal societies. Moral rules, and specifically belief in moralizing gods, are expected to reflect this difference. An analysis of cross-cultural data of preindustrial societies does not refute the hypothesis that moralizing gods are more often found in patrilocal/lineal societies, nor is this hypothesis unambiguously supported.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Pierre van den Berghe (personal communication, 11 January 2012): “There is, of course, an enormous amount of noise in the HRAF data, so, while positive findings are persuasive, non-significant ones don't necessarily mean much. However, since most of your correlations were weak and non-significant, but all in the predicted direction, I consider your hypothesis fairly well supported.”

References

  • Alexander RD (1979) Darwinism and human affairs. Pitman, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Alexander RD (1987) The biology of moral systems. Aldine de Gruyter, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Archie EA, Morrison TA, Foley CAH et al (2006) Dominance rank relationships among wild female African elephants, Loxodonta Africana. Anim Behav 71:117–127

    Google Scholar 

  • Balshine S, Leach B, Neat F et al (2001) Correlates of group size in a cooperatively breeding cichlid fish (Neolamprologus pulcher). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 50:134–140

    Google Scholar 

  • Barry H III (2007) Customs associated with premarital sexual freedom in 143 societies. Cross-Cult Res 41:261–272

    Google Scholar 

  • Baunach DM (2001) Gender inequality in childhood: toward a life course perspective. Gender Issues 19(3):61–86

    Google Scholar 

  • Chagnon NA (1988) Life histories, blood revenge, and warfare in a tribal population. Science 239:985–992

    Google Scholar 

  • Clutton-Brock TH, Russell AF, Sharpe LL et al (2002) The evolution and development of sex differences in cooperative behaviour in meerkats. Science 297:253–256

    Google Scholar 

  • Cronk L (1994) Evolutionary theories of morality and the manipulative use of signals. Zygon 29:81–101

    Google Scholar 

  • Daly M, Wilson M (1983) Explaining inbreeding avoidance requires more complex models. Behav Brain Sci 6:105

    Google Scholar 

  • Daly M, Wilson M (1988) Homicide. Aldine de Gruyter, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Desjardins JK, Stiver KA, Fitzpatrick JL, Balshine S (2008) Differential responses to territory intrusions in cooperatively breeding fish. Anim Behav 75:595–604

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekvall K (1998) Effects of social organization, age and aggressive behaviour on allosuckling in wild fallow deer. Anim Behav 56:695–703

    Google Scholar 

  • Ember M, Ember CR (1971) The conditions favoring matrilocal residence versus patrilocal residence. Am Anthropol 73:571–594

    Google Scholar 

  • Emerson RM (1962) Power-dependence relations. Am Sociol Rev 27:31–40

    Google Scholar 

  • Engh AL, Funk SM, Van Horn RC et al (2002) Reproductive skew among males in a female dominated mammalian society. Behav Ecol 13:93–200

    Google Scholar 

  • Ewald PW (1993) The evolution of virulence. Sci Am 268:56–62

    Google Scholar 

  • Frayser SG (1985) Varieties of sexual experience: an anthropological perspective on human sexuality. HRAF Press, New Haven

    Google Scholar 

  • Grinnell J, McComb K (1996) Maternal grouping as a defence against potentially infanticidal males: evidence from field playback experiments on African lions. Behav Ecol 7:55–59

    Google Scholar 

  • Hale AM, Williams DA, Rabenold KN (2003) Territoriality and neighbor assessment in Brown Jays (Cyanocorax morio) in Costa Rica. Auk 120:446–456

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton WD (1964) The genetical evolution of social behaviour. J Theor Biol 7:1–52

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton WD (1980) Sex versus non-sex versus parasite. Oikos 35:282–290

    Google Scholar 

  • Hapke A, Zinner D, Zischler H (2001) Mitochondrial DNA variation in Eritrean hamadryas baboons (Papio hamadryas hamadryas): life history influences population genetic structure. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 50:483–492

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartung J (1985) Matrilineal inheritance: new theory and analysis. Behav Brain Sci 8:661–668

    Google Scholar 

  • Le Galliard J-F, Gundersen G, Andreassen HP et al (2006) Natal dispersal, interactions among siblings and intrasexual competition. Behav Ecol 17:733–740

    Google Scholar 

  • McKinnon L, Gilchrist HG, Scribner KT (2006) Genetic evidence for kin-based female social structure in common eiders (Somateria mollissima). Behav Ecol 17:614–621

    Google Scholar 

  • Murdock GP (1967) Ethnographic atlas. University of Pittsburgh Press, Pittsburgh

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson M (1965) The logic of collective action: public goods and the theory of groups. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Öst M, Ydenberg R, Kilpi M, Lindstrom K (2003) Condition and coalition formation by brood-rearing common eider females. Behav Ecol 14:311–317

    Google Scholar 

  • Öst M, Vitikainen E, Waldeck P et al (2005) Eider females form non-kin broodrearing coalitions. Mol Ecol 14:3903–3908

    Google Scholar 

  • Packer C, Lewis S, Pusey A (1992) A comparative analysis of non-offspring nursing. Anim Behav 43:265–281

    Google Scholar 

  • Popa-Lisseanu AG, Bontadina F, Mora O et al (2008) Highly structured fission-fusion societies in an aerial-hawking, carnivorous bat. Anim Behav 75:471–482

    Google Scholar 

  • Pope TR (2000) Reproductive success increases with degree of kinship in cooperative coalitions of female red howler monkeys (Alouatta seniculus). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 48:253–267

    Google Scholar 

  • Pusey AE (1987) Sex-biased dispersal and inbreeding avoidance in birds and mammals. Trends Ecol Evol 2:295–299

    Google Scholar 

  • Pusey AE, Packer C (1987) Dispersal and philopatry. In: Smuts BB, Cheney DL, Seyfarth RM et al (eds) Primate societies. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 250–266

    Google Scholar 

  • Randall DA, Pollinger JP, Wayne RK et al (2007) Inbreeding is reduced by female-biased dispersal and mating behavior in Ethiopian wolves. Behav Ecol 18:579–589

    Google Scholar 

  • Roes FL (2010) Haplodiploidy seems to facilitate queen re-absorption and dependent founding in eusocial insects. Entomol Ber 70:2–5

    Google Scholar 

  • Roes FL, Raymond M (2003) Belief in moralizing gods. Evol Hum Behav 24:126–135

    Google Scholar 

  • Rossiter SJ, Jones G, Ransome RD et al (2002) Relatedness structure and kin-biased foraging in the greater horseshoe bat (Rhinolophus ferrumequinum). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 51:510–518

    Google Scholar 

  • Roulin A (2002) Why do lactating females nurse alien offspring? A review of hypotheses and empirical evidence. Anim Behav 63:201–208

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiver KA, Fitzpatrick JL, Desjardins JK et al (2006) Sex differences in rates of territory joining and inheritance in a cooperatively breeding cichlid fish. Anim Behav 71:449–456

    Google Scholar 

  • Trivers RL (1985) Social evolution. Benjamin/Cummings, Menlo Park

    Google Scholar 

  • Van den Berghe PL (1979) Human family systems: an evolutionary view. Waveland Press, Prospect Heights

    Google Scholar 

  • van der Jeugd HP, van der Veen IT, Larsson K (2002) Kin clustering in barnacle geese: familiarity or phenotype matching? Behav Ecol 13:786–790

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitehead H (1996) Babysitting, dive synchrony, and indications of alloparental care in sperm whales. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 38:237–244

    Google Scholar 

  • Whyte M (1978) The status of women in preindustrial societies. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams GC (1975) Sex and evolution. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams DA, Hale AM (2006) Helper effects on offspring production in cooperatively breeding brown jays (Cyanocorax morio). Auk 123:847–857

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams JM, Pusey AE, Carlis JV et al (2002) Female competition and male territorial behaviour influence female chimpanzees’ ranging patterns. Anim Behav 63:347–360

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson EO (1975) Sociobiology: the new synthesis. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

I very much appreciate the contributions to this paper made by Katherine Cummings, Carol Ember, John Hartung, Hamilton McMillan, Pierre van den Berghe, and an anonymous reviewer.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Frans L. Roes.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (PDF 63 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Roes, F.L. Permanent Group Membership. Biol Theory 9, 318–324 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13752-014-0169-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13752-014-0169-8

Keywords

Navigation