Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The topic of power

  • Published:
Human Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Anderson, B., & Carlos, M. L. What is social network theory? In T. R. Burns & W. Buckley (Eds.),Power and control: social structures and their transformation. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications, Inc. 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumgartner, T., Buckley, W., Burns, T. R., & Schuster, P. Meta-power and the structuring of social hierarchies. In T. R. Burns & W. Buckley (Eds.),Power and control: Social structures and their transformation. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications, Inc. 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cicourel, A. V.Cognitive Sociology: Language and meaning in social interaction. Baltimore, MD: Penguin, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clegg, S.Power, rule, and domination: A critical and empirical understanding of power in sociological theory and organizational life. Boston, MA: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emerson, R. M. Power-dependence relations.American Sociological Review 1962,27 31–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hickson, D. J., Hinings, C. R., Lee, C. A., Schneck, R. E., & Pennings, J. M. A strategic contingencies' theory of intraorganizational power.Administrative Science Quarterly 1971,16 216–229.

    Google Scholar 

  • Husserl, E.Experience and judgment: Investigations in a geneology of logic (Rev. Ed.). L. Landgrebe and J. S. Churchill (Eds.), (E. Ameriks, trans.). Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macklin, R. Reasons vs. causes in explanation of action.Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 1972,33 78–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNall, S., & Johnson, J. C. M. The new conservatives: ethnomethodologists, phenomenologists, and symbolic interactionists.The Insurgent Sociologist 1975,V 49–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merleau-Ponty, M.Sense and non-sense. (H. L. Dreyfus, and P. A. Dreyfus, trans.). Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press, 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagel, J. H.The descriptive analysis of power. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1975

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, M. F. Instrumental and infra-resources: The bases of power.American Journal of Sociology 1974,79 1418–1433.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, M. F. Goffman on Power.American Sociologist 1977,12 88–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schutz, A.The phenomenology of the social world. (G. Walsh & F. Lehnert, trans.). Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schutz, A. In R. M. Zaner (Ed.),Reflections on the problem of relevance. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schutz, A. In M. Natanson (Ed.),Collected papers I: The problem of social reality. The Hague: Nijhoff, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schutz, A., & Thomas Luckmann.The structures of the life-world (R. M. Zaner & H. Tristram Engelhardt, Jr., trans.). Northwestern University Press, 1973.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Sociology, The University of West Florida, Pensacola, Florida

    Mary F. Rogers

Authors
  1. Mary F. Rogers
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rogers, M.F. The topic of power. Hum Stud 5, 183–194 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02127676

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02127676

Keywords

Search

Navigation