Skip to main content
Log in

Challenging the transcendental position: the holism of experience

  • Published:
Continental Philosophy Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Taking the problem of perception and illusion as a leading clue, this article presents a new phenomenological approach to perception and the world: “holism of experience.” It challenges not only Husserl’s transcendentalism, but also what remains of it in Heidegger’s early thought, on the grounds that it is committed to the skeptical inference: “Since we can always doubt any perception, we can always doubt perception as a whole.” The rejection of such an implicit inference leads to a relational paradigm of Being-in-the-World that differs from Heidegger’s on many points.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Dilthey (2002, p. 249); id. (1992, p. 229).

  2. Dilthey (2002, p. 253); id. (1992, pp. 233–234).

  3. Heidegger (1999, p. 61) [Below Heidegger’s Gesamtausgabe is abbreviated GA #, p. #].

  4. Ibid., p. 5.

  5. Heidegger (1962, p. 225) [Below Heidegger’s Being and Time is abbreviated BT, p. #]; id., (1986, p. 180) [Below Heidegger’s Sein und Zeit is abbreviated SZ, p. #].

  6. Heidegger (1992, p. 157); GA 20, p. 211.

  7. Boehm (1959, p. 486).

  8. Ingarden (1975, p. 21). [“Streichen wir das reine Bewusstsein, so streichen wir die Welt.”].

  9. Husserl (1998, p. 3); id., Husserliana [abbreviated below as Hua] 1, p. 3. See also Husserl (1973, p. 1); id., Hua 1, p. 43.

  10. BT, pp. 246–247; SZ, p. 202.

  11. BT, p. 271 [trans. slightly modified—Tr.]; SZ, p. 229.

  12. GA 56/57, p. 92.

  13. Heidegger (1988 p. 170); GA 24, p. 241.

  14. BT, pp. 255–256; SZ, p. 212.

  15. BT, p. 251; SZ, p. 208.

  16. BT, p. 34; SZ 13.

  17. Heidegger (1988, p. 216); GA 24, p. 308.

  18. Heidegger (1988, p. 166); GA 24, p. 237.

  19. Heidegger (1984, p. 169); GA 26, p. 217.

  20. Husserl (1997, p. 12); Hua 16, p. 15.

  21. Husserl (1997, p. 13); Hua 16, p. 16.

  22. Husserl (1982, p. 332); Hua 3.1, p. 320.

  23. Husserl (1973, p. 17); Hua 1, p. 57.

  24. Qtd. by Merleau-Ponty (1962, p. 334).

  25. Ibid., p. 340 [trans. modified—Tr.].

  26. Hinton (1973). See also Austin (1962), Putnam (1999) and McDowell (1998).

  27. Merleau-Ponty (1962, pp. 344, 339, 342, respectively).

  28. Ibid., xvi.

  29. Ibid., p. 207. See also BT, p. 251: “But what distinguishes this assertion [“the external world is Really present-at hand”] is the fact that in realism there is a lack of ontological understanding. Indeed realism tries to explain Reality ontically by Real connections of interaction between things that are Real.”

  30. Merleau-Ponty (1962, pp. 49, 363–364, 369); “The return to perceptual experience… puts out of court all forms of realism,” Ibid., p. 47.

  31. Heidegger (1984, p. 192); GA 26, 248–249.

References

  • Austin, J.L. 1962. Sense and sensibilia. London: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boehm, R. 1959. Les ambiguïtés des concepts husserliens d’’immanence’ et de ‘transcendance’. Revue philosophique de la France et de l’étranger 84: 481–526.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dilthey, W. 1992. Gesammelte Schriften, Bd. 7, Der Aufbau der geschichtlichen Welt in den Geisteswissenschaften.Stuttgart: B.G. Teubner, Göttingen, Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht. 229.

  • Dilthey, W. 2002. In The formation of the historical world in the human sciences, ed. R.A. Makkreel, and F. Rodi. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heidegger, M. 1962. Being and time (trans: John Macquarrie, and Edward Robinson). New York: Harper & Row.

  • Heidegger, M. 1984. The metaphysical foundations of logic (trans: Michael Heim). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

  • Heidegger, M. 1986. Sein und Zeit. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heidegger, M. 1988. The basic problems of phenomenology (trans: Richard Rojcewicz, and André Schuwer). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

  • Heidegger, M. 1992. History of the concept of time: Prolegomena (trans: Theodore Kisiel). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

  • Heidegger, M. 1994. Gesamtausgabe, Bd. 20, Prolegomena zur Geschichte des Zeitbegriffs. Frankfurt a.M.: Vittorio Klostermann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heidegger, M. 1997. Gesamtausgabe, Bd. 24, Die Grundprobleme der Phänomenologie. Frankfurt a.M.: Vittorio Klostermann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heidegger, M. 1999. Gesamtausgabe, Bd. 56/57, Zur Bestimmung der Philosophie. Frankfurt a.M.: Vittorio Klostermann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heidegger, M. 2007. Gesamtausgabe, Bd. 26. Metaphysische Anfangsgründe der Logik im Ausgang von Leibniz. Frankfurt a.M.: Vittorio Klostermann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinton, J.M. 1973. Experiences. An inquiry into some ambiguities. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Husserl, E. 1973. Cartesian meditations. An introduction to phenomenology (trans: Dorion Cairns). The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.

  • Husserl, E. 1982. Ideas pertaining to a pure phenomenology and to a phenomenological philosophy (First Book, trans: Kersten, F.). Dordrecht: Kluwer.

  • Husserl, E. 1997. Thing and space: Lectures of 1907 (trans: Richard Rojcewicz). Dordrecht: Kluwer.

  • Husserl, E. 1998. The Paris lectures (trans: Peter Koestenbaum). Dordrecht: Kluwer.

  • Ingarden, R. 1975. On the motives which led Husserl to transcendental idealism (trans: Arnór Hannibalsson). The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.

  • McDowell, J. 1998. Criteria, defeasibility and knowledge. In meaning, knowledge and reality, 369–394. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merleau-Ponty, M. 1962. Phenomenology of perception (trans: Colin Smith). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

  • Putnam, H. 1999. The threefold cord: Mind, body and world. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Claude Romano.

Additional information

Translated by Michael B. Smith, Berry College (smithster@gmail.com).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Romano, C. Challenging the transcendental position: the holism of experience. Cont Philos Rev 44, 1–21 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11007-011-9165-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11007-011-9165-x

Keywords

Navigation