Abstract
“Confucianism⋯ is a universal ethic in which the rules and imperatives of behavior hold for all individuals.” (Peter F. Drucker, Forbes, 1981). Peter Drucker is credited as the founder of modern American management. In his distinguished career he has written widely and authoritatively on the subject and to a large extent his work possesses a distinctive ethical tone. This paper will argue that Confucian ethics underlie much of Drucker's writing. Both Drucker and Confucius view power as the central ethical issue in human relations. They emphasize authority, leadership, legitimacy, hierarchy, interdependence and individual ethical responsibility in their analysis of human affairs. Drucker views the development of large-scale formal organizations and the concomitant rise of the managerial class as the most significant developments of the 20th century, which makes the management of interdependent roles and relationships a central ethical challenge. Confucius, and the early Confucians, understood human relationships as based upon hierarchy, interdependence and personal ethics. The paper will analyze Drucker's work in light of the early Confucian Classics (The Analects, The Mencius, The Great Learning and The Doctrine of the Mean). Drucker, himself, considers The End of Economic Man (1939), The Future of Industrial Man (1942), Concept of the Corporation (1983), and The Essential Drucker (2001) as his most important and influential works. The paper will analyze these along with other works by Drucker as appropriate.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bahm, Archie J.: 1992, The Heart of Confucius (Jain Publishing, Fremont, CA).
Drucker, Peter F.: 1939, The End of Economic Man (The John Day Company, New York).
Drucker, Peter F.: 1942, The Future of Industrial Man (The John Day Company, New York).
Drucker, Peter F.: 1949, The New Society: The Anatomy of the Industrial Order (Harper & Brothers, New York).
Drucker, Peter F.: 1954, The Practice of Management (Harper & Row, New York; Brothers, New York).
Drucker, Peter F.: 1981, ‘Ethical Chic’, Forbes, 160–173.
Drucker, Peter F.: 1983, Concept of the Corporation (New American Library, New York).
Drucker, Peter F.: 1986, The Frontiers of Management (Truman Talley, New York).
Drucker, Peter F.: 1990, Managing the Non-Profit Organization (HarperBusiness, New York).
Drucker, Peter F.: 1993, Post-Capitalist Society (HarperBusiness, New York).
Drucker, Peter F.: 1996, Adventures of a Bystander (Transaction Publishers, New Brunswick, NJ).
Drucker, Peter F.: 1999a, The Frontiers of Management: Where Tomorrow's Decisions are Being Shaped Today (Truman Tally, New York).
Drucker, Peter F.: 1999b, Management Challenges for the 21st Century (HarperBusiness, New York).
Drucker, Peter F.: 1999c, ‘The Rise, Fall and Return of Pluralism’, The Wall Street Journal, (June 1), A 22.
Drucker, Peter F.: 2001, The Essential Drucker (HarperBusiness, New York).
Drucker, Peter F.: 2002, Managing in the Next Society (Truman Talley, New York).
Flaherty, John E.: 1999, Peter Drucker: The Making of the Managerial Mind (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco).
Fingarette, Herbert: 1972, Confucius: The Secular as Sacred (Waveland Press, Prospect Heights, Il).
Graham, A. C.: 1989, Disputers of the Tao (Open Court, Chicago, IL).
Legge, James: 1971, Confucius: Confucian Analects, Great Learning & The Doctrine of the Mean (Dover Publications, New York).
Lau, D. C. (trans.): 1970, Mencius (Penguin Books, New York).
Schiesel, Seth: 2002, ‘Trying to Catch WorldCom's Mirage’, The New York Times, Section 3, (June 30), p. 14.
Schwartz, Benjamin I.: 1985, The World of Thought in Ancient China (Belknap Press, Cambridge, MA).
Schwartz, Michael: 1998, ‘Peter Drucker and the Denial of Business Ethics’, Journal of Business Ethics, 1685–1692.
Yao, Xinzhong, 2000, An Introduction to Confucianism (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Romar, E.J. Managerial Harmony: The Confucian Ethics of Peter F. Drucker. Journal of Business Ethics 51, 199–210 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:BUSI.0000033613.11761.7b
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:BUSI.0000033613.11761.7b