Abstract
Preposed negation yes/no (yn)-questions like Doesn't Johndrink? necessarily carry the implicature that the speaker thinks Johndrinks, whereas non-preposed negation yn-questions like DoesJohn not drink? do not necessarily trigger this implicature. Furthermore,preposed negation yn-questions have a reading “double-checking” pand a reading “double-checking” ≠ p, as in Isn't Jane comingtoo? and in Isn't Jane coming either? respectively. We present otheryn-questions that raise parallel implicatures and argue that, in allthe cases, the presence of an epistemic conversational operator VERUMderives the existence and content of the implicature as well as thep/≠ p-ambiguity.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alexiadou, Artemis. and Elena Anagnostopoulou: 1998, ‘Parametrizing Agr: Word Order, V-movement and EPP-checking’, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 16, 491–539.
Bartels, Christine: 1999, Intonation of English Statements and Questions, Garland Publishing, New York.
Bolinger, Dwight: 1978, ‘Yes-No Questions are not Alternative Questions’, in H. Hiz (ed.), Questions, Reidel, Dordrecht, pp. 87–105.
Büring, Daniel and Christine Gunlogson: 2000, ‘Aren't Positive and Negative Polar Questions the Same?’, ms. UCSC.
Choi, Hye-Won: 1999, Optimizing Structure in Context: Scrambling and Information Structure, CSLI, Stanford.
Creswell, Cassandre: 2000, ‘The Discourse Function of Verum Focus in Wh-Questions’, in: Proceedings of North Eastern Linguistics Society, Vol. 30, GLSA.
Ellegård, Alvar: 1953, The Auxiliary Do: the Establishment and Regulation of its Use in English, Vol. II of Gothenburg Studies in English, Göteborg, Stockholm, Almqvist, Wiksell.
Gärdenfors, Peter: 1988, Knowledge in Flux, The MIT Press, Cambridge, London.
Grice, Herbert Paul: 1975, ‘Logic and Conversation’, in P. Cole and J. L. Morgan (eds.), Speech Acts, Vol. III of Syntax and Semantics, Academic Press, NY, pp. 41–58.
Groenendijk, Jeroen and Martin Stokhof: 1984, ‘Studies in the Semantics of Questions and the Pragmatics of Answers’, Ph.D. thesis, University of Amsterdam.
Gunlogson, Christine: 2001, ‘True to Form: Rising and Falling Declaratives as Questions in English’, Ph.D. thesis, UC Santa Cruz.
Hamblin, C. L.: 1973, ‘Questions in Montague Grammar’, Foundations of Language 10, 41–53.
Han, Chung-hye: 1998, ‘Deriving the Interpretation of Rhetorical Questions’, in E. Curis, J. Lyle, and G. Webster (eds.), Proceedings of West Coast Conference in Formal Linguistics, Vol. 16. Stanford, pp. 237–253, CSLI.
Han, Chung-hye: 1999, ‘The Structure and Interpretation of Imperatives: Mood and Force in Universal Grammar’, Ph.D. thesis, University of Pennsylvania.
Heim, Irene: 1994, ‘Interrogative semantics and Karttunen's semantics for know’, in Proceedings of the Israeli Association for Theoretical Linguistics.
Höhle, T.: 1992, ‘Ueber Verum Fokus in Deutschen’, Linguistische Berichte Sonderheft 4, 112–141.
Karttunen, Lauri: 1977, ‘Syntax and Semantics of Questions’, Linguistics and Philosophy 1, 3–44.
É. Kiss, K.: 1981, ‘Structural Relations in Hungarian, a ‘Free’ Word Order Language’, Linguistic Inquiry 12, 185–213.
Ladd, Robert D.: 1981, ‘A First Look at the Semantics and Pragmatics of Negative Questions and Tag Questions’, In Papers from the Seventeenth Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, Chicago Linguistics Society, pp. 164–171.
Ladusaw, William: 1980, Polarity Sensitivity as Inherent Scope Relations, Outstanding Dissertations in Linguistics, Garland Publishing, New York.
Landman, Fred: 1986, Towards a theory of Information. The Status of Partial Objects in Semantics, Foris, Dordrecht.
Linebarger, M. C.: 1980, The Grammar of Negative Polarity, Ph.D. thesis, MIT.
Linebarger, Marcia C.: 1987, ‘Negative Polarity and Grammatical Representation’, Linguistics and Philosophy 10(3), 325–387.
Millar, Martin and Keith Brown: 1979, ‘Tag Questions in Edinburgh Speech’, Linguistische Berichte 60, 24–45.
Pierrehumbert, Janet and Julia Hirschberg: 1990, ‘The Meaning of Intonational Contours in the Interpretation of Discourse’, in J. M. Philip R. Cohen and M. E. Pollack (eds.), Intentions in Communications, MIT Press, pp. 271–311.
Prince, Ellen: 1998, ‘On the Limits of Syntax, with Reference to Topicalization and Left-Dislocation’, in P. Culicover and L. Mcnally (eds.), The Limits of Syntax, Academic Press, NY, pp. 281–302.
Prince, Ellen: 1999, ‘How Not to Mark Topics: ‘Topicalization’ in English and Yiddish’, in Spoken and Written Texts, Workshop Proceedings, Texas Linguistic Forum, Austin, Chapter 8.
Progovac, Ljiljana: 1994, Negative and Positive Polarity: A Binding Approach, Cambridge Studies in Linguistics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Rizzi, Luigi: 1997, ‘The Fine Structure of the Left Periphery’, in L. Haegeman (ed.), Elements of Grammar, Kluwer Academic Publishers, The Netherlands, pp. 281–337.
Roberts, Craige: 1996, ‘Information Structure in Discourse: Towards an Integrated Formal Theory of Pragmatics’, in J. Yoon and A. Kathol (eds.), OSU Working Papers in Linguistics 49: Papers in Semantics, Ohio State University, Dept. of Linguistics, pp. 91–136.
Romero, Maribel and Chung-hye Han: 2001, ‘On Certain Epistemic Implicatures in Yes/No Questions’, in Proceedings of the 13th Amsterdam Colloquium, ILLC/Dept. Philosophy, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam.
Romero, Maribel and Chung-hye Han: 2002, ‘Verum Focus in Negative Yes/No Questions and Ladd's p /¬p Ambiguity’, in Proceedings of Semantics and Linguistic Theory, Vol. 12, CLC Publications, Ithaca, NY.
Rooth, Mats: 1992, ‘A Theory of Focus Interpretation’, Natural Language Semantics 1, 75–116.
van Rooy, Robert and Marie Šafářová: 2003, ‘On Polar Questions’, in R. Young and Y. Zhou (eds.), Proceedings of Semantics and Linguistic Theory, Vol. 13, CLC Publications, Ithaca, NY.
Sadock, J. M.: 1971, ‘Queclaratives’, in Proceedings of the 7th Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, CLS, Chicago.
Stalnaker, Robert C.: 1978, ‘Assertion’, in P. Cole (ed.), Pragmatics, Vol. 9 of Syntax and Semantics, Academic Press, New York, pp. 315–322.
Stechov, Arnim von: 1981, ‘Topic, Focus and Local Relevance’, in W. Klein and W. Levelt (eds.), Crossing the Boundaries in Linguistics, Reidel, Dordrecht, pp. 95–130.
Suñer, Margarita: 1994, ‘V-movement and the Licensing of Argumental wh-phrase in Spanish’, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 12, 335–372.
Ward, Gregory: 1988, The Semantics and Pragmatics of Preposing, Garland Publishing, Inc., New York, London, 1985 University of Pennsylvania Ph.D. Dissertation.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Romero, M., Han, CH. On Negative Yes/No Questions. Linguistics and Philosophy 27, 609–658 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:LING.0000033850.15705.94
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:LING.0000033850.15705.94