Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-x4r87 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T16:54:39.763Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Are Homologies (Selected Effect or Causal Role) Function Free?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2022

Alex Rosenberg  and
Karen Neander
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article argues that at least very many judgments of homology rest on prior attributions of selected-effect (SE) function, and that many of the “parts” of biological systems that are rightly classified as homologous are constituted by (are so classified in virtue of) their consequence etiologies. We claim that SE functions are often used in the prior identification of the parts deemed to be homologous and are often used to differentiate more restricted homologous kinds within less restricted ones. In doing so, we discuss recent criticism of this view that has been offered (especially that offered by Paul Griffiths).

Type
Research Article
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 76 , Issue 3 , July 2009 , pp. 307 - 334
Copyright
Copyright © The Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

‡

For comments on previous drafts we are grateful to Robert Brandon, Daniel McShea, Paul Griffiths, Jason Clark, participants in the Triangle philosophy of biology seminar—and most of all, to Michael Dickson.

References

Amundson, Ron, and Lauder, G. V. (1994), “Function without Purpose: The Uses of Causal Role Function in Evolutionary Biology”, Function without Purpose: The Uses of Causal Role Function in Evolutionary Biology 9:443–469.Google Scholar
Gilbert, S. F., et al. (2006), Developmental Biology. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer.Google Scholar
Gould, Stephen Jay (1993), “An Earful of Jaw”, in his Eight Little Piggies. New York: Norton, 95–108.Google Scholar
Gould, Stephen Jay ([1994] 1997), “Hooking Leviathan by Its Past”, in his Dinosaur in a Haystack: Reflections in Natural History. New York: Three Rivers, 359–377.Google Scholar
Gould, Stephen Jay, and Lewontin, Richard C. (1979), “The Spandrels of San Marco and the Panglossian Paradigm: A Critiquie of the Adaptationist Programme”, The Spandrels of San Marco and the Panglossian Paradigm: A Critiquie of the Adaptationist Programme 205:581–598.Google Scholar
Griffiths, Paul E. (1994), “Cladistic Classification and Functional Explanation”, Cladistic Classification and Functional Explanation 61:206–227.Google Scholar
Griffiths, Paul E. (2006), “Function, Homology, and Character Individuation”, Function, Homology, and Character Individuation 73:1–25.Google Scholar
Griffiths, Paul E. (2007), “The Phenomenon of Homology”, The Phenomenon of Homology 22:643–658.Google Scholar
Griffiths, Paul E. (2009), “In What Sense Does ‘Nothing Make Sense Except in the Light of Evolution’?”, In What Sense Does ‘Nothing Make Sense Except in the Light of Evolution’? 57:11–32.Google ScholarPubMed
Griffiths, Paul, and Grey, Russell D. (1994), “Developmental Systems and Evolutionary Explanation”, Developmental Systems and Evolutionary Explanation 91:277–304.Google Scholar
Hall, B. (1994), Homology: The Hierarchical Basis of Comparative Biology. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Kardong, K. V., et al. (2002), Vertebrates: Comparative Anatomy, Function, Evolution. 3rd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Kermack, K. A., Mussett, F., and Rigney, H. W. (1981), “The Skull of Morganucodon”, The Skull of Morganucodon 71:1–158.Google Scholar
Mendeleev, N. ([1869–1905] 2005), Mendeleev on the Periodic Law: Selected Writings, 1869–1905. Selected and edited by William B. Jensen. New York: Dover.Google Scholar
Neander, Karen (1991), “Functions as Selected Effects: The Conceptual Analysts Defense”, Functions as Selected Effects: The Conceptual Analysts Defense 58:168–184.Google Scholar
Neander, Karen (2002), “Types of Traits: The Importance of Functional Homologues”, in Ariew, Andre, Cummins, Robert, and Perlman, Mark (eds.), Functions: New Essays in the Philosophy of Psychology and Biology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 390–415.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, Alex (2006), Darwinian Reductionism; or, How to Stop Worrying and Love Molecular Biology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, D’Arcy ([1917] 1992), On Growth and Form. Reprint. Edited by John Tyler Bonner. New York: Dover.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vaughan, T. A., et al. (2000), Mammalogy. 4th ed. Forth Worth, TX: Saunders.Google Scholar
Wright, Larry (1976), Teleological Explanations. Los Angeles: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar