Abstract
In a series of recent papers, Crispin Wright has developed and defended an epistemic account of borderline cases which he calls ‘Liberalism’. If Verdict Exclusion is the claim that no polar verdict on borderline cases is knowledgeable, then Liberalism implies the view that Verdict Exclusion is itself nothing we are in a position to know. It is a matter of ongoing discussion what more Liberalism implies. In any case, Wright argues that Liberalism affords the means to account for the intuition that polar verdicts on borderline cases are equally permissible. Here I argue that Liberalism fails to deliver and that an account of borderline cases based on Verdict Exclusion fares much better when it comes to showing that our ordinary practice of reaching verdicts on borderline cases is fully legitimate: all it needs is a reassessment of the nature of the claims such verdicts express.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Rosenkranz S. (2003). Wright on vagueness and agnosticism. Mind 112: 449–463
Rosenkranz S. (2005a). Knowledge in borderline cases. Analysis 65: 49–55
Rosenkranz S. (2005b). Anti-Realism, borderline cases and knowledge by observation. In: Moruzzi, S. and Sereni, A. (eds) Issues on vagueness. Methodology and agnosticism, pp 117–130. Padua, Il Poligrafo
Rosenkranz S. (2007a). Agnosticism as a third stance. Mind 116: 55–104
Rosenkranz S. (2007b). The agnostic stance. Paderborn, Mentis Verlag
Schiffer S. (2003). The things we mean. Clarendon Press, Oxford
Shapiro S. (2003). Vagueness and conversation. In: Beall, J.C. (eds) Liars and heaps. New essays on paradox, pp 39–72. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Williamson T. (1994). Vagueness. Routledge, London
Williamson T. (2000). Knowledge and its limits. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Wright C. (1992). Truth and objectivity. Harvard University Press, Cambridge/MA
Wright C. (2003a). Rosenkranz on quandary, vagueness and intuitionism. Mind 112: 465–474
Wright C. (2003b). Vagueness: A fifth column approach. In: Beall, J.C. (eds) Liars and heaps. New essays on paradox, pp 84–105. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Wright, C. (forthcoming). On the characterisation of borderline cases. In G. Ostertag (Ed.), Meaning and other things: Essays on Stephen Schiffer, Cambridge/MA: MIT Press. Draft available online at http://www.philosophy.fas.nyu.edu/docs/IO/1187/borderline.pdf.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rosenkranz, S. Liberalism, entitlement, and verdict exclusion. Synthese 171, 481–497 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-008-9331-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-008-9331-9