Skip to main content
Log in

Principled Autonomy and Plagiarism

  • Published:
Journal of Academic Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Every semester, professors in every discipline are burdened with the task of checking for plagiarized papers. Since plagiarism has become rampant in the university, it can be argued that devoting time to checking for plagiarism is nothing more than a fool’s errand. Students will continue to plagiarize regardless of the consequences. In this paper, I will argue that professors do have a categorically binding obligation to confirm whether papers have been plagiarized. I will use Onora O'Neill’s account of “principled autonomy” as the foundation for my argument. Moral agents can only act on principles that can be adopted by all. Dishonesty cannot be adopted since honesty would cease to exist. Furthermore, failing to check for plagiarized papers is a failure to treat all students and professors and ends-in-themselves.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Plagiarism is but one example of academic dishonesty. However, in this paper, I will use the terms plagiarism and academic dishonesty interchangeably.

  2. For a detailed discussion of difference, see Jonathan Glover. “It Makes No Difference Whether or Not I Do It”, reprinted in Applied Ethics, ed. Peter Singer (Oxford: NY, 1986)

References

  • Glover, J. (1986). It makes no difference whether or not i do it. In: Peter Singer (ed.), reprinted in Applied ethics. Oxford: NY.

  • Kant, I. (1988). Fundamental principles of the metaphysics of morals, trans. T. K. Abbott. Prometheus Books: Buffalo, NY.

  • O’Neill, O. (1985). Between consenting adults. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 14(3), 252–277. Summer.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Neill, O. (1993a). Justice, gender, and international boundaries. In M. Nussbaum & A. Sen (Eds.), The quality of life. NY: Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Neill, O. (1993b). Kantian ethics. In P. Singer (Ed.), A companion to ethics (pp. 175–185). London: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Neill, O. (2004). Kant: Rationality as practical reason. In A. J. Mele & P. Rawling (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of rationality (pp. 93–109). NY: Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Neill, O. (2005). Autonomy and trust in bioethics. Cambridge: Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Neill, O. (2008). Kantian formula of the end in itself and world hunger. In: L Pojman (ed.), Reprinted in Ethical theory, 5th edn. Wadsworth: Belmont, CA.

  • O’Neill, O. Perverting trust. The clare hall ashby lecture of 2009, lecture delivered May 15, 2009 at Robinson College, Cambridge University.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Melinda Rosenberg.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rosenberg, M. Principled Autonomy and Plagiarism. J Acad Ethics 9, 61–69 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-011-9132-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-011-9132-5

Keywords

Navigation